Effect of Eu–Er substitution on structural, optical, dielectric, and electrical properties of Ba0.5Sr0.5Eu Er Fe12–2O19 hexaferrite

Jayashri Mahapatro,Sher Singh Meena,Sadhana Agrawal
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jre.2024.01.010
IF: 4.632
2024-01-01
Journal of Rare Earths
Abstract:The present work reports the structural, optical, dielectric, and electrical properties of Eu–Er substituted M-type Ba0.5Sr0.5Eu x Er x Fe12–2x O19 (x = 0, 0.05, 0.1, 0.15, and 0.2) hexaferrites synthesized by sol–gel combustion method. The hexagonal structure of the Ba0.5Sr0.5Eu x Er x Fe12–2x O19 samples was confirmed from X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis. The values of lattice parameters of the Ba0.5Sr0.5Eu x Er x Fe12–2x O19 samples are increased as compared to Ba0.5Sr0.5Fe12O19 sample. This increase in the value of lattice parameters is attributed to the substitution of larger cations (Eu3+ and Er3+) in place of smaller cations (Fe3+ ions). The crystallite sizes of the Ba0.5Sr0.5Eu x Er x Fe12–2x O19 samples also increase due to the substitution of larger cations. The force constants (K o and K t) increases with increasing Eu–Er concentration. The octahedral cluster shifts towards the higher wavenumber side whereas the tetrahedral cluster shifts towards the lower wavenumber side due to Eu–Er substitution in the Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectra. The photoluminescence (PL) emission spectra for the Ba0.5Sr0.5Eu x Er x Fe12–2x O19 samples are observed at 365 nm. The dielectric dispersion in the Ba0.5Sr0.5Eu x Er x Fe12–2x O19 samples can be understood by Koop's theory and Maxwell–Wagner type of interfacial polarization. Using Jonscher's power law and the correlated barrier hopping (CBH) model, the frequency and temperature-dependent behaviour of ac conductivity of Ba0.5Sr0.5Eu x Er x Fe12–2x O19 samples are described. The temperature-dependent behaviour of the dc conductivity of the Ba0.5Sr0.5Eu x Er x Fe12–2x O19 samples is explained by the variable range hopping (VRH) model. The Motto temperature of the sample varies from 4.55 × 109 to 2.31 × 108 K. The estimated maximum barrier height (W M) of the compound varies from 0.6603 to 0.1199 eV. The temperature coefficient and activation energy of the samples were also calculated as a function of Eu–Er concentration.
chemistry, applied
What problem does this paper attempt to address?