Abstract:296 Background: Proximal gastrectomy (PG) has become an increasingly preferred procedure for treating early cancer in the upper third of the stomach when oncological safety is ensured, with expectation for improvement of nutritional status and quality of life (QOL) attributable to the remnant stomach. Although few studies compare postoperative outcomes of patients who undergo total gastrectomy (TG) and PG based on questionnaires, their significant limitations include the retrospective design, use of a questionnaire not specific to a postgastrectomy setting, and observation at a fixed time or after a short postoperative period. Methods: A multi-institutional prospective study (CCOG1602) of patients who undergo PG or TG for cStage I gastric cancer was conducted. We used the Post-Gastrectomy Syndrome Assessment Scale (PGSAS)-37 and The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer quality of life questionnaire (EORTC-QLQ-C30) to evaluate the changes in body weight and QOL over a 3-year postoperative period. The primary endpoint was the weight loss rate 3 years after surgery. Results: We enrolled 109 patients from 18 institutions and selected 65 and 19 patients for inclusion in the TG and PG groups, respectively. There were no differences in age, sex, or preoperative body mass index between the TG and PG groups. Mean postoperative weight loss rates were 16.0% and 11.7% for the TG and PG groups, respectively (Cohen's D 0.656) during postoperative year 1 and 15.0% and 10.8% for TG and PG (Cohen's D 0.543), respectively, during postoperative year 3, indicating that the PG group achieved a better trend with a moderate effect size. According to the PGSAS-37, the PG group experienced a better trend in the indigestion subscale (Cohen's D –1.085) and total symptom score (Cohen's D –0.59) during postoperative year 3 compared with the TG group. In contrast, the EORTC-QLQ-C30 identified no difference between the groups at any time point during the 3-year postoperative period. Conclusions: The CCOG1602 demonstrates that PG tended to be more favorable compared with TG with respect to postoperative weight loss and QOL, particularly regarding indigestion. Clinical trial information: UMIN000020070 .

Trans-pacific multicenter collaborative study of minimally invasive proximal versus total gastrectomy for proximal gastric and gastroesophageal junction cancers

Comparison of Laparoscopic Proximal Gastrectomy with Double-Tract Reconstruction and Laparoscopic Total Gastrectomy for Proximal Gastric Cancer with Stage Ct1-2.

A multi-institutional prospective study to compare postoperative quality of life of patients who undergo proximal or total gastrectomy for early gastric cancer (CCOG1602).

Evaluation Of Early Surgical Outcomes, Acute Inflammatory Response And Oncological Outcomes In Patients Undergo Totally Laparoscopic Distal Gastrectomy: A Prospective Comparision With Open Distal Gastrectomy

A multi‐institutional prospective observational study to compare postoperative quality of life of patients who undergo total or proximal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer (CCOG1602)

A 3-Arm case-matched analysis of anti-reflux reconstruction methods after laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy - Single tract jejunal interposition vs double tract reconstruction vs tube-like stomach reconstruction

Total Versus Proximal Gastrectomy for Proximal Gastric Cancer after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: a Multicenter Retrospective Propensity Score-Matched Cohort Study.

Proximal Gastrectomy with Jejunal Interposition and TGRY Anastomosis for Proximal Gastric Cancer

Reconstruction Techniques and Associated Morbidity in Minimally Invasive Gastrectomy for Cancer: Insights From the GastroBenchmark and GASTRODATA databases

Possibly more favorable short‐term outcomes with minimally invasive surgery than with open surgery in total gastrectomy for locally advanced gastric cancer: A single high‐volume center study

Total Vs. Proximal Gastrectomy for Proximal Gastric Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

The comparison of long-term oncological outcomes and complications after proximal gastrectomy with double tract reconstruction versus total gastrectomy for proximal gastric cancer

Feasibility and long-term survival of proximal gastrectomy after neoadjuvant therapy for locally advanced proximal gastric cancer: A propensity-score-matched analysis

Impact of Different Gastrectomy and Reconstruction Methods on Prognosis and Quality of Life in Proximal Gastric Cancer

Long‐term quality of life after open and laparoscopic total gastrectomy for stage I gastric cancer: A prospective multi‐institutional study (CCOG1504)

Different Methods of Minimally Invasive Esophagojejunostomy After Total Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer: Outcomes from Two Experienced Centers

Clinical Comparison of Proximal Gastrectomy with Double-Tract Reconstruction Versus Total Gastrectomy with Roux-en-Y Anastomosis for Siewert Type II/III Adenocarcinoma of the Esophagogastric Junction

Postoperative nutritional outcomes and quality of life-related complications of proximal versus total gastrectomy for upper-third early gastric cancer: a meta-analysis

Introduction of minimally invasive surgery for distal and total gastrectomy: a population-based study

Long-Term Outcome of Proximal Gastrectomy for Upper-Third Advanced Gastric and Siewert Type II Esophagogastric Junction Cancer Compared With Total Gastrectomy: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis