Co‐chaperone BAG3 enters autophagic pathway via its interaction with microtubule associated protein 1 light chain 3 beta

Hagen Körschgen,Marius Baeken,Daniel Schmitt,Heike Nagel,Christian Behl
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/tra.12916
2023-09-03
Traffic
Abstract:The co‐chaperone BAG3 ensures proper sequestration of aggregated ubiquitinated proteins to autophagic‐lysosomal degradation. As the amino acid sequence of BAG3 comprises conserved putative LC3 interacting regions, we closely analyzed the interaction with LC3 proteins. Here, we provide evidence of a direct interaction between BAG3 with LC3B by various measures including pull‐down experiments, peptide arrays, proximity ligation assays, colocalization and native autophagic vesicles analyses. Our findings suggest that BAG3 may act as a cargo receptor for client proteins in autophagy. The co‐chaperone BAG3 is a hub for a variety of cellular pathways via its multiple domains and its interaction with chaperones of the HSP70 family or small HSPs. During aging and under cellular stress conditions in particular, BAG3, together with molecular chaperones, ensures the sequestration of aggregated or aggregation‐prone ubiquitinated proteins to the autophagic‐lysosomal system via ubiquitin receptors. Accumulating evidence for BAG3‐mediated selective autophagy independent of cargo ubiquitination led to analyses predicting a direct interaction of BAG3 with LC3 proteins. Phylogenetically, BAG3 comprises several highly conserved potential LIRs, LC3‐interacting regions, which might allow for the direct targeting of BAG3 including its cargo to autophagosomes and drive their autophagic degradation. Based on pull‐down experiments, peptide arrays and proximity ligation assays, our results provide evidence of an interaction of BAG3 with LC3B. In addition, we could demonstrate that disabling all predicted LIRs abolished the inducibility of a colocalization of BAG3 with LC3B‐positive structures and resulted in a substantial decrease of BAG3 levels within purified native autophagic vesicles compared with wild‐type BAG3. These results suggest an autophagic targeting of BAG3 via interaction with LC3B. Therefore, we conclude that, in addition to being a key co‐chaperone to HSP70, BAG3 may also act as a cargo receptor for client proteins, which would significantly extend the role of BAG3 in selective macroautophagy and protein quality control.
cell biology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?