Abstract:Background This paper investigates initial exuberance and emotions surrounding ChatGPT’s first three months of launch (1 December 2022–1 March 2023). The impetus for studying active discussions surrounding its implications, fears, and opinions is motivated by its nascent popularity and potential to disrupt existing professions; compounded by its significance as a crucial inflexion point in history. Capturing the public zeitgeist on new innovations—much like the advent of the printing press, radio, newspapers, or the internet—provides a retrospective overview of public sentiments, common themes, and issues. Objectives Since launch, few big data studies delved into initial public discourse surrounding the chatbot. This report firstly identifies highest-engagement issues and themes that generated the most interaction; secondly, identifies the highest-engaged keywords on both sides of the sentiment valence scale (positive and negative) associated with ChatGPT. Methods We interrogate a large twitter corpus (n = 4,251,662) of all publicly available English-language tweets containing the ChatGPT keyword. Our first research aim utilizes a prominent peaks model (upper-quartile significance threshold of prominence>20,000). Our second research aim utilized sentiment analysis to identify, week-on-week, highest-frequency negative, and positive keywords and emojis. Results Six prominent peaks were identified with the following themes: ‘hype and hesitance’, ‘utility and misuse in professional and academic settings’, ‘demographic bias’, ‘philosophical thought experiments on morality’ and ‘artificial intelligence as a mirror of human knowledge’. Of high-frequency valence, negativity included credibility concerns, implicit bias, environmental ethics, employment rights of data annotators and programmers, the ethicality of neural network datasets. Positivity included excitement over application, especially in coding, as a creative tool, education, and personal productivity. Conclusions Overall, sentiments and themes were double-edged, expressing excitement over this powerful new tool and wariness toward its potential for misuse.

ChatGPT and marketing: Analyzing public discourse in early Twitter posts

Marketing with ChatGPT: Navigating the Ethical Terrain of GPT-Based Chatbot Technology

Public Attitudes Toward ChatGPT on Twitter: Sentiments, Topics, and Occupations

On ChatGPT and Beyond: How Generative Artificial Intelligence May Affect Research, Teaching, and Practice

ChatGPT For Marketing Communications: Friend or Foe?

ChatGPT Adoption in Marketing: Exploring Drivers and Barriers through Behavioral Reasoning Theory

Early ChatGPT User Portrait through the Lens of Data

ChatGPT in education: A discourse analysis of worries and concerns on social media

"The ChatGPT bot is causing panic now – but it'll soon be as mundane a tool as Excel": analysing topics, sentiment and emotions relating to ChatGPT on Twitter

Generative AI and Marketing Education: What the Future Holds

Generative AI Generating Buzz: Volume, Engagement, and Content of Initial Reactions to ChatGPT in Discussions Across Education-Related Subreddits

Powerful tool or too powerful? Early public discourse about ChatGPT across 4 million tweets

Generative AI Impact on Marketing Agency

Public Opinions on ChatGPT: An Analysis of Reddit Discussions by Using Sentiment Analysis, Topic Modeling, and SWOT Analysis

Artificial intelligence and ChatGPT: Exploring Current and potential future roles in marketing education

From Optimism to Concern: Unveiling Sentiments and Perceptions Surrounding ChatGPT on Twitter

The public attitude towards ChatGPT on reddit: A study based on unsupervised learning from sentiment analysis and topic modeling

Last Week with ChatGPT: A Weibo Study on Social Perspective Regarding ChatGPT for Education and Beyond

Exploring Public Response to ChatGPT With Sentiment Analysis and Knowledge Mapping

Chatting about ChatGPT: how may AI and GPT impact academia and libraries?