Abstract:Purpose Objectively evaluating the fairness of the algorithm, exploring in specific scenarios combined with scenario characteristics and constructing the algorithm fairness evaluation index system in specific scenarios. Design/methodology/approach This paper selects marketing scenarios, and in accordance with the idea of “theory construction-scene feature extraction-enterprise practice,” summarizes the definition and standard of fairness, combs the application link process of marketing algorithms and establishes the fairness evaluation index system of marketing equity allocation algorithms. Taking simulated marketing data as an example, the fairness performance of marketing algorithms in some feature areas is measured, and the effectiveness of the evaluation system proposed in this paper is verified. Findings The study reached the following conclusions: (1) Different fairness evaluation criteria have different emphases, and may produce different results. Therefore, different fairness definitions and standards should be selected in different fields according to the characteristics of the scene. (2) The fairness of the marketing equity distribution algorithm can be measured from three aspects: marketing coverage, marketing intensity and marketing frequency. Specifically, for the fairness of coverage, two standards of equal opportunity and different misjudgment rates are selected, and the standard of group fairness is selected for intensity and frequency. (3) For different characteristic fields, different degrees of fairness restrictions should be imposed, and the interpretation of their calculation results and the means of subsequent intervention should also be different according to the marketing objectives and industry characteristics. Research limitations/implications First of all, the fairness sensitivity of different feature fields is different, but this paper does not classify the importance of feature fields. In the future, we can build a classification table of sensitive attributes according to the importance of sensitive attributes to give different evaluation and protection priorities. Second, in this paper, only one set of marketing data simulation data is selected to measure the overall algorithm fairness, after which multiple sets of marketing campaigns can be measured and compared to reflect the long-term performance of marketing algorithm fairness. Third, this paper does not continue to explore interventions and measures to improve algorithmic fairness. Different feature fields should be subject to different degrees of fairness constraints, and therefore their subsequent interventions should be different, which needs to be continued to be explored in future research. Practical implications This paper combines the specific features of marketing scenarios and selects appropriate fairness evaluation criteria to build an index system for fairness evaluation of marketing algorithms, which provides a reference for assessing and managing the fairness of marketing algorithms. Social implications Algorithm governance and algorithmic fairness are very important issues in the era of artificial intelligence, and the construction of the algorithmic fairness evaluation index system in marketing scenarios in this paper lays a safe foundation for the application of AI algorithms and technologies in marketing scenarios, provides tools and means of algorithm governance and empowers the promotion of safe, efficient and orderly development of algorithms. Originality/value In this paper, firstly, the standards of fairness are comprehensively sorted out, and the difference between different standards and evaluation focuses is clarified, and secondly, focusing on the marketing scenario, combined with its characteristics, key fairness evaluation links are put forward, and different standards are innovatively selected to evaluate the fairness in the process of applying marketing algorithms and to build the corresponding index system, which forms the systematic fairness evaluation tool of marketing algorithms.

Advancing algorithmic bias management capabilities in AI-driven marketing analytics research

Algorithmic bias in data-driven innovation in the age of AI

Algorithmic bias: review, synthesis, and future research directions

Addressing Algorithmic Bias and the Perpetuation of Health Inequities: An AI Bias Aware Framework

Bias, Fairness, and Accountability with AI and ML Algorithms

Fairness evaluation of marketing algorithms: a framework for equity distribution

Practical, epistemic and normative implications of algorithmic bias in healthcare artificial intelligence: a qualitative study of multidisciplinary expert perspectives

AI bias: exploring discriminatory algorithmic decision-making models and the application of possible machine-centric solutions adapted from the pharmaceutical industry

Algorithmic fairness in business analytics: Directions for research and practice

Bias, Fairness and Accountability with Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning Algorithms

Bias in data‐driven artificial intelligence systems—An introductory survey

Bias in artificial intelligence algorithms and recommendations for mitigation

Whither Bias Goes, I Will Go: An Integrative, Systematic Review of Algorithmic Bias Mitigation

Algorithmic bias: Looking beyond data bias to ensure algorithmic accountability and equity

Managing bias and unfairness in data for decision support: a survey of machine learning and data engineering approaches to identify and mitigate bias and unfairness within data management and analytics systems

Algorithmic discrimination: examining its types and regulatory measures with emphasis on US legal practices

Automating Automaticity: How the Context of Human Choice Affects the Extent of Algorithmic Bias

Ethics and discrimination in artificial intelligence-enabled recruitment practices

Attenuation of Human Bias in Artificial Intelligence: An Exploratory Approach

Fairness and Bias in Algorithmic Hiring: a Multidisciplinary Survey

An AI-Guided Data Centric Strategy to Detect and Mitigate Biases in Healthcare Datasets