Abstract:Current theories of attention differentiate exogenous from endogenous orienting of visuospatial attention. While both forms of attention orienting engage different functional systems, endogenous and exogenous attention are thought to share resources, as shown by empirical evidence of their functional interactions. The present study aims to uncover the neurobiological basis of how salient events that drive exogenous attention disrupts endogenous attention processes. We hypothesize that interference from exogenous attention over endogenous attention involves alpha-band activity, a neural marker of visuospatial attention. To test this hypothesis, we contrast the effects of endogenous attention across two experimental tasks while we recorded electroencephalography (n = 32, both sexes): a single cueing task where endogenous attention is engaged in isolation, and a double cueing task where endogenous attention is concurrently engaged with exogenous attention. Our results confirm that the concurrent engagement of exogenous attention interferes with endogenous attention processes. We also found that changes in alpha-band activity mediate the relationship between endogenous attention and its effect on task performance, and that the interference of exogenous attention on endogenous attention occurs via the moderation of this indirect effect. Altogether, our results substantiate a model of attention, whereby endogenous and exogenous attentional processes involve the same neurophysiological resources. Significance statement: Scientists differentiate top-down from bottom-up visuospatial attention processes. While bottom-up attention is rapidly engaged by emerging demands from the environment, top-down attention in contrast reflects slow voluntary shifts of spatial attention. Several lines of research substantiate the idea that top-down and bottom-up attentional processes involve distinct functional systems. An increasing number of studies, however, argue that both attention systems share brain processing resources. The current study examines how salient visual events that engage bottom-up processes interfere with top-down attentional processes. Using neurophysiological recordings and multivariate pattern classification techniques, the authors show that these patterns of interference occur within the alpha-band of neural activity (8-12 Hz), which implies that bottom-up and top-down attention processes share this narrow-band frequency brain resource. The results further demonstrate that patterns of alpha-band activity explains, in part, the interference between top-down and bottom-up attention at the behavioral level.

How does exogenous alerting impact endogenous preparation on a temporal cueing task

Interactions between endogenous and exogenous attention during vigilance

Working-Memory-Guided Attention Competes with Exogenous Attention but Not with Endogenous Attention.

Endogenous Attention Affects Decision-related Neural Activity but Not Afferent Visual Responses

Enhancement of perceptual representations by endogenous attention biases competition in response selection

A lateralized alpha-band marker of the interference of exogenous attention over endogenous attention

Orienting attention in time: behavioural and neuroanatomical distinction between exogenous and endogenous shifts

Dissociable Effects of Endogenous and Exogenous Attention on Crowding: Evidence from Event-Related Potentials

High visual salience of alert signals can lead to a counterintuitive increase of reaction times

Differential impact of exogenous and endogenous attention on the contrast sensitivity function across eccentricity

Attentional adjustment in priming tasks: control strategies depend on context

Dynamic alpha power modulations and slow negative potentials track natural shifts of spatio-temporal attention

When temporal attention interacts with expectation

Deployment of spatial attention to a structural framework: exogenous (alerting) and endogenous (goal-directed) factors

Attentional Modulation of Speed-Change Perception in the Perifoveal and Near-Peripheral Visual Field

Effects of involuntary and voluntary attention on critical spacing of visual crowding

Role of endogenous and exogenous attention in task-relevant visual perceptual learning

Effects of alerting signals on the spatial Stroop effect: evidence for modality differences

Cueing spatial attention through timing and probability

Modulation of Neuronal Responses by Exogenous Attention in Macaque Primary Visual Cortex

When does “inhibition of return” occur in spatial cueing tasks? Temporally disentangling multiple cue-triggered effects using response history and conditional accuracy analyses