Abstract:Abstract Background The ongoing COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted the vast differences in approaches to the control and containment of coronavirus across the world and has demonstrated the varied success of such approaches in minimizing the transmission of coronavirus. While previous studies have demonstrated high predictive power of incorporating air travel data and governmental policy responses in global disease transmission modelling, factors influencing the decision to implement travel and border restriction policies have attracted relatively less attention. This paper examines the role of globalization on the pace of adoption of international travel-related non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) during the coronavirus pandemic. This study aims to offer advice on how to improve the global planning, preparation, and coordination of actions and policy responses during future infectious disease outbreaks with empirical evidence. Methods and data We analyzed data on international travel restrictions in response to COVID-19 of 185 countries from January to October 2020. We applied time-to-event analysis to examine the relationship between globalization and the timing of travel restrictions implementation. Results The results of our survival analysis suggest that, in general, more globalized countries, accounting for the country-specific timing of the virus outbreak and other factors, are more likely to adopt international travel restrictions policies. However, countries with high government effectiveness and globalization were more cautious in implementing travel restrictions, particularly if through formal political and trade policy integration. This finding is supported by a placebo analysis of domestic NPIs, where such a relationship is absent. Additionally, we find that globalized countries with high state capacity are more likely to have higher numbers of confirmed cases by the time a first restriction policy measure was taken. Conclusions The findings highlight the dynamic relationship between globalization and protectionism when governments respond to significant global events such as a public health crisis. We suggest that the observed caution of policy implementation by countries with high government efficiency and globalization is a by-product of commitment to existing trade agreements, a greater desire to ‘learn from others’ and also perhaps of ‘confidence’ in a government’s ability to deal with a pandemic through its health system and state capacity. Our results suggest further research is warranted to explore whether global infectious disease forecasting could be improved by including the globalization index and in particular, the de jure economic and political, and de facto social dimensions of globalization, while accounting for the mediating role of government effectiveness. By acting as proxies for a countries’ likelihood and speed of implementation for international travel restriction policies, such measures may predict the likely time delays in disease emergence and transmission across national borders.

Neoliberalism and governmental and individual responses to the COVID‐19 pandemic: A cross‐national analysis

Culture and political regimes: How have they influenced the effectiveness of COVID-19 response policy?

Governmental responses and firm resilience during the COVID-19 pandemic: The role of culture and politics

Is Neoliberalism Killing Us? A Cross Sectional Study of the Impact of Neoliberal Beliefs on Health and Social Wellbeing in the Midst of the COVID-19 Pandemic

Do National Cultures Matter in the Containment of COVID-19?

THE CORONAVIRUS PANDEMIC AND AMERICAN NEOLIBERALISM

Global Consciousness Predicts Behavioral Responses to the COVID-19 Pandemic: Empirical Evidence From 35 Cultures

“The Tragedy of the Commons”: How Individualism and Collectivism Affected the Spread of the COVID-19 Pandemic

Government capacity, societal trust or party preferences: what accounts for the variety of national policy responses to the COVID-19 pandemic in Europe?

Policy Stringency, Political Conditions, and Public Performances of Pandemic Control: an International Comparison

The Effect of Governmental Health Measures on Public Behaviour During the COVID-19 Pandemic Outbreak

Comparative Study of Government Response Measures and Epidemic Trends for COVID-19 Global Pandemic

Government Response Measures and Public Trust during the COVID‐19 Pandemic: Evidence from Around the World

How does globalization affect COVID-19 responses?

The COVID-19 pandemic as experienced by the individual

When Covid-19 first struck: Analysis of the influence of structural characteristics of countries - technocracy is strengthened by open democracy

Culture and contagion: Individualism and compliance with COVID-19 policy

The Consequences of Neoliberalism in the Current Pandemic

Community responses to COVID-19 pandemic first wave containment measures: a multinational study

Impact of Policy Response on Health Protection and Economic Recovery in OECD and BRIICS Countries During the Early Stages of the COVID-19 Pandemic

Epidemic outcomes following government responses to COVID-19: Insights from nearly 100,000 models