Abstract:BackgroundPart 1 of CheckMate 227 (NCT02477826), a phase III study in 1L NSCLC, has dual primary endpoints. The primary endpoint of progression-free survival (PFS) with NIVO + IPI vs chemo in patients (pts) with tumor mutational burden ≥ 10 mut/Mb was met, as reported previously. Here we present the primary endpoint of overall survival (OS) for NIVO + IPI vs chemo in pts with tumor PD-L1 expression ≥ 1%.MethodsPts were chemo-naive, with stage IV or recurrent NSCLC without EGFR or known ALK alterations, ECOG PS 0–1. Pts with PD-L1 ≥1% (n = 1189) were randomized 1:1:1 to NIVO 3 mg/kg Q2W + IPI 1 mg/kg Q6W, NIVO 240 mg Q2W, or histology-based chemo; pts with PD-L1 < 1% (n = 550) were randomized 1:1:1 to NIVO 3 mg/kg Q2W + IPI 1 mg/kg Q6W, NIVO 360 mg Q3W + chemo, or chemo. Pts were stratified by histology in both populations. Pts were treated until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or for 2 y of immunotherapy.ResultsBaseline characteristics were balanced across tx arms. Minimum follow-up for the primary endpoint was 29.3 mo. For pts with PD-L1 ≥ 1%, OS was significantly longer with NIVO + IPI vs chemo (HR 0.79, 97.72% CI: 0.65–0.96; P = 0.007); PFS, objective response rates, and duration of response favored NIVO + IPI vs chemo. OS benefit was also observed in pts with PD-L1 < 1% and all randomized pts (Table). Prespecified analyses showed enhanced efficacy with NIVO + IPI relative to NIVO in PD-L1 ≥ 1% and relative to NIVO + chemo in PD-L1 < 1%. Grade 3–4 tx-related adverse event rates in all randomized pts were 33% with NIVO + low-dose IPI, 19% with NIVO, and 36% with chemo. Table: LBA4_PREfficacy outcomes with NIVO + IPI, NIVO, NIVO + chemo, and chemo in 1L advanced NSCLC with PD-L1 ≥ 1%, PD-L1 < 1%, and in all randomized pts in CheckMate 227 part 1PD-L1 ≥ 1%NIVO + IPI n = 396Chemo n = 397NIVOa n = 396Median OS, mo (95% CI) HR vs chemo (97.72% CI) P value 1-year OS rate, % 2-year OS rate, %17.1 (15.0–20.1) 0.79 (0.65–0.96) P = 0.007 63 4014.9 (12.7–16.7) - - 56 3315.7 (13.3–18.1) 0.88 (0.75–1.04)b - 57 36Median PFS, mo (95% CI) HR vs chemo (95% CI)5.1 (4.1–6.3) 0.82 (0.69–0.97)5.6 (4.6–5.8) -4.2 (3.0–5.3) 0.99 (0.84–1.17)Objective response rate, n (%) Median duration of response, mo (95% CI)142 (35.9) 23.2 (15.2–32.2)119 (30.0) 6.2 (5.6–7.4)109 (27.5) 15.5 (12.7–23.5)PD-L1 < 1%NIVO + IPI n = 187Chemo n = 186NIVO + chemoc n = 177Median OS, mo (95% CI) HR vs chemo (95% CI) 1-year OS rate, % 2-year OS rate, %17.2 (12.8–22.0) 0.62 (0.48–0.78) 60 4012.2 (9.2–14.3) - 51 2315.2 (12.3–19.8) 0.78 (0.62–0.98) 59 35All randomized ptsNIVO + IPI n = 583Chemo n = 583Median OS, mo (95% CI) HR vs chemo (95% CI) 1-year OS rate, % 2-year OS rate, %17.1 (15.2–19.9) 0.73 (0.64–0.84) 62 4013.9 (12.2–15.1) - 54 30aStudy treatment only in PD-L1 ≥ 1% population;b95% CI for NIVO vs chemo;cstudy treatment only in PD-L1 < 1% population. Minimum follow-up for OS and PFS was 29.3 mo and for objective response rate, 28.3 mo.ConclusionsCheckMate 227 met its primary endpoint of significantly improved OS with NIVO + IPI vs chemo in 1L advanced NSCLC with PD-L1 ≥ 1%. OS was also improved with NIVO + IPI in PD-L1 < 1% and in all randomized pts. Safety profile was consistent with previous reports in NSCLC. NIVO + IPI represents a new chemo-free tx option for pts in 1L advanced NSCLC.Clinical trial identificationNCT02477826; Release date: June 23, 2015.Editorial acknowledgementWriting and editorial assistance was provided by Namiko Abe, PhD, of Caudex, funded by Bristol-Myers Squibb.Legal entity responsible for the studyBristol-Myers Squibb.FundingBristol-Myers Squibb.DisclosureS. Peters: Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): AbbVie, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Biocartis, Bioinvent, Blueprint Medicines, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Clovis, Daiichi Sankyo, Debiopharm, Eli Lilly, F. Hoffmann-La Roche, Foundation Medicine, Illumina, Janssen, Merck Sharp and Dohme, M. S.S. Ramalingam: Research grant / Funding (institution): Bristol-Myers Squibb; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution), Personal fees, advisory board: Amgen; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy, Personal fees, advisory board: AbbVie; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy, Personal fees, advisory board: Lilly; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy, Personal fees, advisory board: Genentech; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution), Personal fees, advisory board: Takeda; Honoraria (self), Personal fees: Loxo; Research grant / Funding (institution): Advaxis; Honoraria (self), Research grant / Funding (institution), Personal fees: Tesaro; Honoraria (self), Research grant / Funding (institution), Personal fees: Merck; Honoraria (self), Research grant / Funding (self), Personal fees: AstraZeneca. L. Paz-Ares: Advisory /-Abstract Truncated-

First‐line nivolumab, paclitaxel, carboplatin, and bevacizumab for advanced non‐squamous non‐small cell lung cancer: Updated survival analysis of the ONO‐4538‐52/TASUKI‐52 randomized controlled trial

Nivolumab Versus Docetaxel in a Predominantly Chinese Patient Population with Previously Treated Advanced NSCLC: CheckMate 078 Randomized Phase III Clinical Trial

OA11 First-Line Nivolumab + Ipilimumab in Asian Patients with Advanced NSCLC and High TMB (≥10 Mut/mb): Results from CheckMate 227

Abstract CT114: Nivolumab Versus Docetaxel in a Predominantly Chinese Patient Population with Previously Treated Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC): Results of the Phase 3 CheckMate 078 Study

First-line Nivolumab Plus Ipilimumab Combined with Two Cycles of Chemotherapy in Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: a Subanalysis of Asian Patients in CheckMate 9LA

Nivolumab Versus Chemotherapy in Patients with Advanced Oesophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Refractory or Intolerant to Previous Chemotherapy (ATTRACTION-3): a Multicentre, Randomised, Open-Label, Phase 3 Trial

First-line nivolumab plus ipilimumab combined with two cycles of chemotherapy in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (CheckMate 9LA): an international, randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial

First-line nivolumab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for advanced gastric, gastro-oesophageal junction, and oesophageal adenocarcinoma (CheckMate 649): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial

First-line Nivolumab Plus Ipilimumab with Two Cycles of Chemotherapy Versus Chemotherapy Alone (four Cycles) in Advanced Non-Small-cell Lung Cancer: CheckMate 9LA 2-Year Update

First-Line Nivolumab Plus Ipilimumab With Chemotherapy Versus Chemotherapy Alone for Metastatic NSCLC in CheckMate 9LA: 3-Year Clinical Update and Outcomes in Patients With Brain Metastases or Select Somatic Mutations

First-line Nivolumab (NIVO) Plus Ipilimumab (IPI) Plus Two Cycles of Chemotherapy (chemo) Versus Chemo Alone (4 Cycles) in Patients with Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC): Two-year Update from CheckMate 9LA.

First-Line Nivolumab in Stage IV or Recurrent Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer

Five-Year Survival Outcomes With Nivolumab Plus Ipilimumab Versus Chemotherapy as First-Line Treatment for Metastatic Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer in CheckMate 227

Nivolumab (NIVO) + low-dose ipilimumab (IPI) vs platinum-doublet chemotherapy (chemo) as first-line (1L) treatment (tx) for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): CheckMate 227 part 1 final analysis

Four-year clinical update and treatment switching-adjusted outcomes with first-line nivolumab plus ipilimumab with chemotherapy for metastatic non-small cell lung cancer in the CheckMate 9LA randomized trial

First-line Nivolumab Plus Ipilimumab with Two Cycles of Chemotherapy Versus Chemotherapy Alone (four Cycles) in Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: CheckMate 9LA 2-Year Patient-Reported Outcomes

Five-Year Outcomes From the Randomized, Phase III Trials CheckMate 017 and 057: Nivolumab Versus Docetaxel in Previously Treated Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer

Long-Term Survival Outcomes With First-Line Nivolumab Plus Ipilimumab-Based Treatment in Patients With Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer and Tumor PD-L1 <1%: a Pooled Analysis

First-Line Nivolumab Plus Chemotherapy for Advanced Gastric, Gastroesophageal Junction, and Esophageal Adenocarcinoma: 3-Year Follow-Up of the Phase III CheckMate 649 Trial

First-line (1L) Nivolumab (NIVO) + Ipilimumab (IPI) + 2 Cycles of Chemotherapy (chemo) Versus Chemo Alone (4 Cycles) in Patients (pts) with Metastatic Non–small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC): 3-Year Update from CheckMate 9LA.

Nivolumab versus docetaxel in previously treated advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (CheckMate 017 and CheckMate 057): 3-year update and outcomes in patients with liver metastases