Advantages of Using 3D Spheroid Culture Systems in Toxicological and Pharmacological Assessment for Osteogenesis Research

Chawon Yun,Sou Hyun Kim,Kyung Mok Kim,Min Hye Yang,Mi Ran Byun,Joung-Hee Kim,Doyoung Kwon,Huyen T. M. Pham,Hyo-Sop Kim,Jae-Ho Kim,Young-Suk Jung
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25052512
IF: 5.6
2024-02-22
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
Abstract:Bone differentiation is crucial for skeletal development and maintenance. Its dysfunction can cause various pathological conditions such as rickets, osteoporosis, osteogenesis imperfecta, or Paget's disease. Although traditional two-dimensional cell culture systems have contributed significantly to our understanding of bone biology, they fail to replicate the intricate biotic environment of bone tissue. Three-dimensional (3D) spheroid cell cultures have gained widespread popularity for addressing bone defects. This review highlights the advantages of employing 3D culture systems to investigate bone differentiation. It highlights their capacity to mimic the complex in vivo environment and crucial cellular interactions pivotal to bone homeostasis. The exploration of 3D culture models in bone research offers enhanced physiological relevance, improved predictive capabilities, and reduced reliance on animal models, which have contributed to the advancement of safer and more effective strategies for drug development. Studies have highlighted the transformative potential of 3D culture systems for expanding our understanding of bone biology and developing targeted therapeutic interventions for bone-related disorders. This review explores how 3D culture systems have demonstrated promise in unraveling the intricate mechanisms governing bone homeostasis and responses to pharmacological agents.
biochemistry & molecular biology,chemistry, multidisciplinary
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
This paper aims to explore the advantages of using three - dimensional (3D) spheroid culture systems in osteogenesis research in toxicology and pharmacology assessment. Specifically, the paper attempts to address the following key issues: 1. **Limitations of traditional two - dimensional cell culture systems**: Although traditional two - dimensional cell culture systems have made important contributions to the understanding of bone biology, they are unable to accurately replicate the complex biological environment of bone tissue. These limitations include the inability to fully simulate complex cell - cell interactions, the composition of the extracellular matrix (ECM), and the influence of mechanical forces. 2. **Advantages of 3D spheroid culture systems**: The paper details how 3D spheroid culture systems can overcome the deficiencies of traditional 2D culture systems. 3D spheroid culture systems can more realistically simulate the in - vivo environment, enhance physiological relevance, improve predictive ability, and reduce the dependence on animal models. These advantages contribute to the development of safer and more effective drugs. 3. **Applications in osteogenesis research**: The paper emphasizes the potential applications of 3D spheroid culture systems in osteogenesis research. These systems can better simulate the complex structure and function of bone tissue, promote the proliferation and differentiation of bone cells, thereby providing strong support for bone regenerative medicine and disease modeling. 4. **Toxicology and pharmacology assessment**: The application of 3D spheroid culture systems in toxicology and pharmacology assessment has also been a key focus. These systems can more accurately predict drug behavior and toxicity, reduce the risk of failure in the later stages of drug development, and improve the efficiency of drug screening and treatment effect assessment. In summary, by comparing the advantages and disadvantages of 2D and 3D cell culture systems, this paper emphasizes the importance and application prospects of 3D spheroid culture systems in osteogenesis research.