Abstract:Computing protein structure from amino acid sequence information has been a long‐standing grand challenge. Critical assessment of structure prediction (CASP) conducts community experiments aimed at advancing solutions to this and related problems. Experiments are conducted every 2 years. The 2020 experiment (CASP14) saw major progress, with the second generation of deep learning methods delivering accuracy comparable with experiment for many single proteins. There is an expectation that these methods will have much wider application in computational structural biology. Here we summarize results from the most recent experiment, CASP15, in 2022, with an emphasis on new deep learning‐driven progress. Other papers in this special issue of proteins provide more detailed analysis. For single protein structures, the AlphaFold2 deep learning method is still superior to other approaches, but there are two points of note. First, although AlphaFold2 was the core of all the most successful methods, there was a wide variety of implementation and combination with other methods. Second, using the standard AlphaFold2 protocol and default parameters only produces the highest quality result for about two thirds of the targets, and more extensive sampling is required for the others. The major advance in this CASP is the enormous increase in the accuracy of computed protein complexes, achieved by the use of deep learning methods, although overall these do not fully match the performance for single proteins. Here too, AlphaFold2 based method perform best, and again more extensive sampling than the defaults is often required. Also of note are the encouraging early results on the use of deep learning to compute ensembles of macromolecular structures. Critically for the usability of computed structures, for both single proteins and protein complexes, deep learning derived estimates of both local and global accuracy are of high quality, however the estimates in interface regions are slightly less reliable. CASP15 also included computation of RNA structures for the first time. Here, the classical approaches produced better agreement with experiment than the new deep learning ones, and accuracy is limited. Also, for the first time, CASP included the computation of protein–ligand complexes, an area of special interest for drug design. Here too, classical methods were still superior to deep learning ones. Many new approaches were discussed at the CASP conference, and it is clear methods will continue to advance.

Advancing RNA 3D structure prediction: Exploring hierarchical and hybrid approaches in CASP15

RNA tertiary structure prediction in CASP15 by the GeneSilico group: Folding simulations based on statistical potentials and spatial restraints

Accurate RNA 3D Structure Prediction Using a Language Model-Based Deep Learning Approach

RNA 3D structure prediction guided by independent folding of homologous sequences

Improvements of the Hierarchical Approach for Predicting Rna Tertiary Structure

E2Efold-3D: End-to-End Deep Learning Method for accurate de novo RNA 3D Structure Prediction

Advances in RNA 3D Structure Prediction

RNA 3D structure prediction using multiple sequence alignment information

RNA Tertiary Structure Modeling with BRiQ Potential in CASP15

Systematic benchmarking of deep-learning methods for tertiary RNA structure prediction

Optimization Of Rna 3d Structure Prediction Using Evolutionary Restraints Of Nucleotide-Nucleotide Interactions From Direct Coupling Analysis

Integrating end-to-end learning with deep geometrical potentials for ab initio RNA structure prediction

Advances in RNA-protein structure prediction

Machine learning in RNA structure prediction: Advances and challenges

RNA-Puzzles Round II: assessment of RNA structure prediction programs applied to three large RNA structures

RNAJP: enhanced RNA 3D structure predictions with non-canonical interactions and global topology sampling

Has AlphaFold 3 reached its success for RNAs?

Critical assessment of methods of protein structure prediction (CASP)—Round XV

A New Method of RNA Secondary Structure Prediction Based on Convolutional Neural Network and Dynamic Programming

Towards de novo RNA 3D structure prediction

Prediction of the RNA Tertiary Structure Based on a Random Sampling Strategy and Parallel Mechanism