Active Site Architecture of Polymorphic Forms of Human GlutathioneS-Transferase P1-1 Accounts for Their Enantioselectivity and Disparate Activity in the Glutathione Conjugation of 7β,8α-Dihydroxy-9α, 10α-oxy-7,8,9,10-tetrahydrobenzo(a)pyrene
Xun Hu,Rosemary O'donnell,Sanjay K. Srivastava,Hong Xia,Piotr Zimniak,Bindu Nanduri,Richard J. Bleicher,Sanjay Awasthi,Yogesh C. Awasthi,Xinhua Ji,Shivendra V. Singh
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1006/bbrc.1997.6777
IF: 3.1
1997-01-01
Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications
Abstract:In this study, we demonstrate that the active site architecture of the human glutathione (GSH) S-transferase Pi (GSTP1-1) accounts for its enantioselectivity in the GSH conjugation of 7 beta,8 alpha-dihydroxy-9 alpha,10 alpha-oxy-7,8,9,10-tetrahydrobenzo(a) pyrene (anti-BPDE), the ultimate carcinogen of benzo(a)pyrene. Furthermore, we report that the two polymorphic forms of human GSTP1-1, differing in their primary structure by a single amino acid in position 104, have disparate activity toward (+)-anti-BPDE, which can also be rationalized in terms of their active site structures. When concentration of (+)-anti-BPDE, which among four BPDE isomers is the most potent carcinogen, was varied and GSH concentration was kept constant at 2 mM (saturating concentration), both forms of hGSTP1-1 [hGSTP1-1(V104) and hGSTP1-1(I104)] obeyed Michaelis-Menten kinetics. The V-max of GSH conjugation of (+)-anti-BPDE was approximately 3.4 fold higher for hGSTP1-1(V104) than for hGSTP1-1(I104). Adherence to Michaelis-Menten kinetics was also observed for both isoforms when (-)-anti-BPDE, which is a weak carcinogen, was used as the variable substrate. However, (-)-anti-BPDE was a relatively poor substrate for both isoforms as compared with (+)-anti-BPDE. Moreover, there were no significant differences between hGSTP1-1(V104) and hGSTP1-1(I104) in either V-max or K-m for (-)-anti-BPDE. The mechanism of differences in kinetic properties and enantioselectivity of hGSTP1-1 variants toward anti-BPDE was investigated by modeling of the two proteins with conjugation product molecules in their active sites. Molecular modeling studies revealed that the differences in catalytic properties of hGSTP1-1 variants as well as the enantioselectivity of hGSTP1-1 in the GSH conjugation of anti-BPDE can be rationalized in terms of the architecture of their active sites. Our results suggest that the population polymorphism of hGSTP1-1 variants with disparate enzyme activities may, at least in part, account for the differential susceptibility of individuals to carcinogens such as anti-BPDE and possibly other similar carcinogens. (C) 1997 Academic Press.