Neoadjuvant immunotherapy and chemotherapy regimens for the treatment of high-risk, early-stage triple-negative breast cancer: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

Javier Cortes,Amin Haiderali,Min Huang,Wilbur Pan,Peter Schmid,Katherine G. Akers,Julie E. Park,Andrew M. Frederickson,Peter A. Fasching,Joyce O’Shaughnessy
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-023-11293-4
IF: 4.638
2023-08-24
BMC Cancer
Abstract:Patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) are generally younger and more likely to experience disease recurrence and have the shortest survival among all breast cancer patients. Recently, neoadjuvant delivery of the programmed cell death protein-1 inhibitor pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy followed by adjuvant pembrolizumab was approved for patients with high-risk, early-stage TNBC, but this treatment regimen has not been evaluated in head-to-head trials with other neoadjuvant treatment regimens. Therefore, the objective of this study was to estimate the relative efficacy of neoadjuvant pembrolizumab + chemotherapy followed by adjuvant pembrolizumab versus other neoadjuvant treatments for early-stage TNBC through a systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA).
oncology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?