The impact of extreme precipitation events and their variability on climate change beliefs in the American public

Sarah Alexander,Mikhaila N. Calice,Dietram Scheufele,Dominique Brossard,Nicole Krause,Daniel B. Wright,Paul Block

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1175/wcas-d-23-0014.1

2023-08-24

Abstract:Although scientists agree that climate change is anthropogenic, differing interpretations of evidence in a highly polarized sociopolitical environment impact how individuals perceive climate change. While prior work suggests that individuals experience climate change through local conditions, there is a lack of consensus on how personal experience with extreme precipitation may alter public opinion on climate change. We combine high resolution precipitation data at the ZIP code level with nationally representative public opinion survey results (n = 4,008) that examine beliefs in climate change and the perceived cause. Our findings support relationships between well-established value systems (i.e., partisanship, religion) and socioeconomic status with individual opinions of climate change, showing that these values are influential in opinion formation on climate issues. We also show that experiencing characteristics of atypical precipitation (e.g., more variability than normal, increasing or decreasing trends, or highly recurring extreme events) in a local area are associated with increased belief in anthropogenic climate change. This suggests that individuals in communities that experience greater atypical precipitation may be more accepting of messaging and policy strategies directly aimed at addressing climate change challenges. Thus, communication strategies that leverage individual perception of atypical precipitation at the local level may help tap into certain "experiential" processing methods, making climate change feel less distant. These strategies may help reduce polarization and motivate mitigation and adaptation actions.

environmental studies,meteorology & atmospheric sciences