Abstract:Transferring scientific knowledge to non-academic audiences is an essential aspect of the open science agenda, which calls for scholars to pursue a popularization of their research. Accordingly, purposefully introducing scientific insights to the public at large is almost univocally deemed commendable. Indeed, in today's models of research evaluation, the objects and activities considered are being extended beyond peer-reviewed journal articles to include non-scholarly popular communication. Although altmetrics offer one instrumental way to count some interactions with lay audiences, their reliance on social media makes them susceptible to manipulation, and mostly reflect circulation among niche audiences. In comparison, attention from non-scholarly media like newspapers and magazines seems a more relevant pathway to effectuate societal impact, due to its recognition in qualitative assessment tools and its broad, societal reach. Based on a case study of social scientists' attention by newspapers and magazines in Flanders (northern Dutch-speaking region of Belgium) in 2019, this paper highlights that frequent participation in the public debate is reserved for high-status researchers only. Results show highly skewed media appearance patterns in both career position and gender, as eight male professors accounted for almost half of all 2019 media attention for social scientists. Because media attention is highly subject-dependent moreover, certain disciplines and fields offer easier pathways to popularization in media than others. Both the open science agenda and research assessment models value presence of researchers in popular media, adding written press attention to existing evaluation assessments however would disproportionately disadvantage early career researchers and exacerbate existing inequalities in academia. Supplementary information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11192-022-04374-x.

Taking a Popular Science Approach to the Field of Attention

Societal impact of university research in the written press: media attention in the context of SIUR and the open science agenda among social scientists in Flanders, Belgium

We need better and more PopSci by scientists

Addressing Challenges to Public Understanding of Science: Epistemic Cognition, Motivated Reasoning, and Conceptual Change

Popular astronomy and other science articles in glossy magazines -- outreaching to those who do not care to be reached

Scientific Outreach: Toward Effective Public Engagement with Biological Science

A case study exploring associations between popular media attention of scientific research and scientific citations

A triangulated approach for understanding scientists' perceptions of public engagement with science

Telling the Stories of Neuroscientific Discovery to Schoolchildren and the Public Can Make an Impact

On Expansion of the Concept of "the Popularization of Science"

What does the public think about language science?

Science as a Public Good: Public Use and Funding of Science

Why should we promote public engagement with science?

Public scientists contributing to local literary fiction. An exploratory analysis

Capably Communicating Science

Visual Attention in Crisis

Rhetoric and the Neurosciences: Engagement and Exploration

A Study on the Role Change and Evaluation of Scientist in Popularization of Science

Keeping the Torch Burning for ‘Good Science’ in Popular Culture: Video Games, Space, and Education

Science docent is better than science chair to science popularization development：A review on the popular science docent competitions

The influence of science popularizers on the public’s view of religion and science: An experimental assessment