Abstract:Since the 1990s, situations in which culturally significant heritage sites serve as symbolic targets for intentional attacks, leading to the 'destruction of enemy communities,' have frequently occurred. The International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY), established to prosecute serious violations of international humanitarian law within the former Yugoslav territories, addresses prominent cases of intentional attacks and destruction of cultural property during the armed conflict, specifically targeting the annihilation of ethnic identity. This article examines the implications and limitations of international legal norms regarding the protection of cultural heritage during armed conflicts, focusing on the Dubrovnik Old Town shelling incident, a representative case of cultural property destruction prosecuted by the ICTY. Firstly, the intentional destruction of cultural heritage is undeniably a significant violation of values that the international community must protect. The pursuit of individual criminal responsibility for the destruction of cultural heritage within the international criminal tribunal signifies a substantial advancement in international efforts to protect cultural heritage during armed conflicts. The negative impact of the intentional destruction of cultural property on human dignity and universal human values is undeniable. However, ensuring effective protection of cultural property in the current normative context, where attacks on cultural property for military purposes may be justified, remains challenging. Secondly, military necessity, rooted in customary international law, limits attacks on enemy forces to military objectives, focusing on the centralization of enemy forces, balancing the military necessity of concentrated attacks on enemy forces with humanitarian considerations to protect civilian objects. However, determining what qualifies as a military objective can be challenging, as it depends on the circumstances of combat and operations. Regardless of whether the principle of proportionality is applicable, evaluating the military necessity from the perspective of cultural heritage protection is crucial. ICTY recognizes that even when military necessity justifies attacks on civilian objects, the intentional destruction of cultural heritage can have a significant impact on the psychological well-being of civilians and may upset the balance with military superiority. Thus, careful consideration is necessary when assessing the military necessity in cases where the protection of cultural property, with a higher need for protection than general civilian objects, is involved. Moreover, even if a target has dual-use, being considered a military objective, evaluating proportionality in the attack is essential to prevent harm to civilians, in accordance with the principle of proportionality. In conclusion, the intentional destruction of cultural heritage should be treated as a threat to the common values of the international community, necessitating appropriate legal and policy responses in line with the actual circumstances of the armed coflict. Military commanders should not only view attacks on cultural heritage as inevitable collateral damage but also recognize the gravity of such acts as war crimes and consider them strategically within military operations.

Endangered cultural heritage in the Russia–Ukraine war: comparing and critiquing interventions by international cultural heritage organizations

Protection of cultural heritage during wartime in Ukraine: legislation and practical aspects of implementation

Protection of Cultural Heritage in the Conditions of a Full-Scale Russian-Ukrainian War: Lessons and Perspectives

SAVING UKRAINIAN CULTURAL HERITAGE DURING THE WAR: PRACTICES OF INTERNATIONAL INTERACTIONS

Protection of cultural heritage: modern realities and experience of international cooperation

Organization of museums of western Ukraine after the full-scale invasion of the Russian Federation

Protection of immovable objects of cultural heritage under aggressive war conditions: theoretical and practical aspects

THE SPECIFICITY OF CULTURAL IDENTITY IN THE PROBLEMS OF MODERN MEDIA

Project approach in the preservation of the cultural heritage of Ukraine

MUSEUM AND WAR. NOTES ON THE DESTINY OF CULTURAL HERITAGE

Cultural preservation and digital heritage: challenges and opportunities

Regarding the investigation of damage to objects of cultural heritage in the conditions of war

Cultural Heritage and Creative Industries in Ensuring Sustainable Development: Ukrainian Experience

Preparing for the post-war reconstruction of historical monuments in Ukraine: Considerations in regard of the ongoing Polish post-WWII experience and international law on the protection and conservation of historical monuments

The return of historical monuments removed from the territory of Ukraine after 2014. Problems of archaeological research in times of war

Issues of preservation and restoration of historical monuments in the occupied territories

Digital Transformation of Preservation and Restoration of Ukraine's Cultural Heritage

Heritage for all (more inclusive) policies for the management of Cultural Assets

PRESERVATION OF NATIONAL AND CULTURAL IDENTITY OF REPRESENTATIVES OF THE UKRAINIAN DIASPORA IN THE CONDITIONS OF SOCIAL CHANGE AND CONFLICTIZATION PROCESSES

The Implications of Cultural Property Destruction in Armed Conflict: A Critical Analysis of International Criminal Responsibility

Destructive trends in contemporary armed conflicts and the overlooked aspect of intangible cultural heritage: A critical comparison of the protection of cultural heritage under IHL and the Islamic law of armed conflict