Abstract:Which messages are more effective at inducing a change of opinion in the listener? We approach this question within the frame of Habermas' theory of communicative action, which posits that the illocutionary intent of the message (its pragmatic meaning) is the key. Thanks to recent advances in natural language processing, we are able to operationalize this theory by extracting the latent social dimensions of a message, namely archetypes of social intent of language, that come from social exchange theory. We identify key ingredients to opinion change by looking at more than 46k posts and more than 3.5M comments on Reddit's r/ChangeMyView, a debate forum where people try to change each other's opinion and explicitly mark opinion-changing comments with a special flag called "delta". Comments that express no intent are about 77% less likely to change the mind of the recipient, compared to comments that convey at least one social dimension. Among the various social dimensions, the ones that are most likely to produce an opinion change are knowledge, similarity, and trust, which resonates with Habermas' theory of communicative action. We also find other new important dimensions, such as appeals to power or empathetic expressions of support. Finally, in line with theories of constructive conflict, yet contrary to the popular characterization of conflict as the bane of modern social media, our findings show that voicing conflict in the context of a structured public debate can promote integration, especially when it is used to counter another conflictive stance. By leveraging recent advances in natural language processing, our work provides an empirical framework for Habermas' theory, finds concrete examples of its effects in the wild, and suggests its possible extension with a more faceted understanding of intent interpreted as social dimensions of language.

Using Linguistic Cues for Analyzing Social Movements

What Truly Matters? Using Linguistic Cues for Analyzing the #BlackLivesMatter Movement and its Counter Protests: 2013 to 2020

Framing Social Movements on Social Media: Unpacking Diagnostic, Prognostic, and Motivational Strategies

An analysis of emotions and the prominence of positivity in #BlackLivesMatter tweets

Sentiment cascades in the 15M movement

What Can Software Tell Us about Media Coverage and Public Opinion? an Analysis of Political News Posts and Audience Comments on Facebook by Computerised Method.

Characterizing Social Movement Narratives in Online Communities: The 2021 Cuban Protests on Reddit

Social media as a living laboratory for researchers: the relationship between linguistics and online user responses

Quantifying the power and consequences of social media protest

Attention and counter-framing in the Black Lives Matter movement on Twitter

The Development of Connective Action during Social Movements on Social Media

Social Movements As a Dialogic Process: Framing, Background Expectancies, and the Dynamics of the Anti-CNN Movement

Protest Movements, Social Media, and the Role of Law Enforcement

Dynamic Emotions of Supporters and Opponents of Anti-racism Movement from George Floyd Protests

From an election to an insurrection: Investigating differential engagement and sentiment in the #defundthepolice and #defendthepolice network on Twitter

MOTIV: Visual Exploration of Moral Framing in Social Media

Mapping Moral Valence of Tweets Following the Killing of George Floyd

Time Series Analysis of Key Societal Events as Reflected in Complex Social Media Data Streams

The Geospatial Characteristics of a Social Movement Communication Network

The Role of Social Media in Mobilizing Social Movements: a Case Study of the "save the Arctic" Campaign

The language of opinion change on social media under the lens of communicative action