Abstract:An energy transition programme based on the principles of energy justice is an important way to mitigate climate change; however, empirical studies on energy justice remain scarce. This study explores key aspects of energy transition policy implementation in China, using three dimensions of energy justice – distributional, recognition and procedural justice – to establish an analytical framework and help develop quantification methodologies. We focused on Luquan District, Shijiazhuang City (Hebei Province, China), to assess energy justice levels following the implementation of China's 'coal-to-gas' energy transition policy in rural regions. The findings indicate that China's rural energy policy has not delivered energy justice. Analysis revealed a markedly low procedural justice index, registering a mere 0.37 on a scale of 0–1, attributable to factors such as the lack of involvement of rural households and a lack of transparency in the design and formulation of policy, as well as a lack of access of rural households to policy-related information. Furthermore, insufficient acknowledgment of the needs of specific groups during the energy transition has negatively impacted recognition justice, resulting in a mid-level index value of 0.69. By comparison, this study shows reveals a reasonably high energy distributional justice index value of 0.89. These findings suggest the need for the government to enhance energy policy communication and responsiveness to its stakeholders, to acknowledge and fairly address the energy transition needs of rural consumers, and to implement targeted energy subsidies to augment distributional justice and preclude the waste of limited financial resources. The analytical framework and calculation methods presented here could contribute to quantifying energy justice levels and to informing energy transition policy both in China and more broadly elsewhere in the world.

Does energy transition help narrow the urban-rural income gap? Evidence from China

Urban–rural income gap and economic sustainability: how does energy transition matters?

Energy Transition, Intensity Growth, and Policy Evolution: Evidence from Rural China

Does the urban–rural income gap matter for rural energy poverty?

Rural household nonagricultural income and energy transition: Evidence from central China

Examining energy inequality under the rapid residential energy transition in China through household surveys

Can the household clean energy transition ameliorate health inequality? Evidence from China

Does the disparity between rural and urban incomes affect rural energy poverty?

Energy transition based on effective energy use in household sector of rural China

Factors Underlying Rural Household Energy Transition: A Case Study of China

Can the Low-Carbon Transition Impact the Urban–Rural Income Gap? Empirical Evidence from the Low-Carbon City Pilot Policy

Assessing energy justice in climate change policies: an empirical examination of China's energy transition

Energy inequality under the toughest-ever clean air policy in China

Rural Residential Energy Transition and Energy Consumption Intensity in China

Assessing the effect of income inequality on household energy poverty—empirical evidence from China

Towards balanced low-carbon development: Driver and complex network of urban-rural energy-carbon performance gap in China

Spatiotemporal characteristics and driving mechanisms of household energy transition in rural China: Micro-evidence from 2005 to 2017

Can Urban Green Transformation Reduce the Urban–Rural Income Gap? Empirical Evidence Based on Spatial Durbin Model and Mediation Effect Model

Spatiotemporal analysis of rural energy transition and upgrading in developing countries: The case of China

Accelerating urbanization serves to reduce income inequality without sacrificing energy efficiency – Evidence from the 78 countries

Assessing the influence of energy transition on economic-social growth: the case of China