Preliminary findings on long‐term effects of fMRI neurofeedback training on functional networks involved in sustained attention

Gustavo Santo Pedro Pamplona,Jennifer Heldner,Robert Langner,Yury Koush,Lars Michels,Silvio Ionta,Carlos Ernesto Garrido Salmon,Frank Scharnowski
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/brb3.3217
IF: 3.1
2023-08-20
Brain and Behavior
Abstract:We present what we believe to be the first study showing that individuals are able to maintain learned self‐regulation of large‐scale brain networks months after the end of a neurofeedback training based on functional magnetic resonance imaging. We also observed that the functional connectivity of the trained regions changed immediately after training and months later, both during active self‐regulation and during resting‐state. Despite the lasting self‐regulation ability and brain changes due to neurofeedback, we observed that the behavioral changes did not persist months after the end of training. Introduction Neurofeedback based on functional magnetic resonance imaging allows for learning voluntary control over one's own brain activity, aiming to enhance cognition and clinical symptoms. We previously reported improved sustained attention temporarily by training healthy participants to up‐regulate the differential activity of the sustained attention network minus the default mode network (DMN). However, the long‐term brain and behavioral effects of this training have not yet been studied. In general, despite their relevance, long‐term learning effects of neurofeedback training remain under‐explored. Methods Here, we complement our previously reported results by evaluating the neurofeedback training effects on functional networks involved in sustained attention and by assessing behavioral and brain measures before, after, and 2 months after training. The behavioral measures include task as well as questionnaire scores, and the brain measures include activity and connectivity during self‐regulation runs without feedback (i.e., transfer runs) and during resting‐state runs from 15 healthy individuals. Results Neurally, we found that participants maintained their ability to control the differential activity during follow‐up sessions. Further, exploratory analyses showed that the training increased the functional connectivity between the DMN and the occipital gyrus, which was maintained during follow‐up transfer runs but not during follow‐up resting‐state runs. Behaviorally, we found that enhanced sustained attention right after training returned to baseline level during follow‐up. Conclusion The discrepancy between lasting regulation‐related brain changes but transient behavioral and resting‐state effects raises the question of how neural changes induced by neurofeedback training translate to potential behavioral improvements. Since neurofeedback directly targets brain measures to indirectly improve behavior in the long term, a better understanding of the brain–behavior associations during and after neurofeedback training is needed to develop its full potential as a promising scientific and clinical tool.
behavioral sciences,neurosciences
What problem does this paper attempt to address?