Pathogenesis and treatment of ascites
J. Rodés
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2796.1996.17842000.x
1996-09-01
Journal of Internal Medicine
Abstract:Before the 1960s the formation of ascites was related to the ‘underfilling theory’. According to this theory, the first event to induce renal sodium and water retention is the alteration of the Starling equilibrium in the sinusoids and splanchnic capillaries as a consequence of increased resistance to portal blood flow leading to increased filtration in the interstitium. This produces an increase in lymphatic flow, which returns the fluid to the systemic circulation through the thoracic duct. However, as the portal hypertension increases the lymphatic system is not able to reabsorb the excess production of fluid ; therefore, this fluid accumulates in the abdominal cavity, forming ascites, producing a loss of fluid from the intravascular space and, consequently, leading to hypovolaemia. This produces a compensatory increase of renal sodium and water retention. However, the retained fluid cannot adequately fill the intravascular compartment because the fluid is continuously leaking in to the abdominal cavity, thus creating a vicious circle. In those cases with marked hypovolaemia, functional renal failure (hepatorenal syndrome) develops as a result of an intense active renal vasoconstriction. Nevertheless, there are some data that do not support this hypothesis. First of all, cirrhotics with ascites exhibit high cardiac output, hypervolaemia and reduced peripheral vascular resistance; second, plasma volume does not change during formation or loss of ascitic fluid ; and third, studies performed in cirrhotic rats clearly indicate that renal sodium retention precedes ascites formation, suggesting that sodium retention is the cause, and not the consequence, of the formation of ascites [1]. In the 1970s the ‘overflow theory’ was proposed in order to explain the relationship between portal hypertension and hypervolaemia in ascites formation. This theory was based on the following observations. First, as already indicated, plasma volume is increased and does not decrease during ascites formation; second, cirrhotics without ascites do not escape from the sodium-retaining effects of mineralcorticoids and form ascites ; and finally, reaccumulation of ascites does not occur immediately after paracentesis. These findings suggested that, in advanced cirrhosis, there is a sodium-retaining signal in the kidneys. The increased renal sodium and water retention produces hypervolaemia and a secondary reduction in systemic vascular resistance as a haemodynamic response to accommodate the excess of intravascular fluid. To explain this primary renal sodium retention it was suggested that there is a ‘hepatorenal reflex’ producing this effect. Although the presence of this reflex has been demonstrated in experimental animals, its importance in the mechanism of sodium retention in human cirrhosis remains unknown. The most important argument against the overflow theory is that these patients have an arterial vascular compartment that is underfilled, rather than overfilled, because there is arterial hypotension despite the increased plasma volume and cardiac output. This peripheral arteriolar vasodilation and concomitant arterial hypotension occurs despite a marked hyperactivity of the endogenous vasoconstrictor systems, mainly the renin– angiotensin–aldosterone (RAAS) and sympathetic