Abstract:Summary Background The optimum curative approach to adenocarcinoma of the oesophagus and oesophagogastric junction is unknown. We aimed to compare trimodality therapy (preoperative radiotherapy with carboplatin plus paclitaxel [CROSS regimen]) with optimum contemporaneous perioperative chemotherapy regimens (epirubicin plus cisplatin or oxaliplatin plus fluorouracil or capecitabine [a modified MAGIC regimen] before 2018 and fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin, and docetaxel [FLOT] subsequently). Methods Neo-AEGIS (CTRIAL-IE 10-14) was an open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial done at 24 centres in Europe. Patients aged 18 years or older with clinical tumour stage T2–3, nodal stage N0–3, and M0 adenocarcinoma of the oesophagus and oesophagogastric junction were randomly assigned to perioperative chemotherapy (three preoperative and three postoperative 3-week cycles of intravenous 50 mg/m 2 epirubicin on day 1 plus intravenous 60 mg/m 2 cisplatin or intravenous 130 mg/m 2 oxaliplatin on day 1 plus continuous infusion of 200 mg/m 2 fluorouracil daily or oral 625 mg/m 2 capecitabine twice daily up to 2018, with four preoperative and four postoperative 2-week cycles of 2600 mg/m 2 fluorouracil, 85 mg/m 2 oxaliplatin, 200 mg/m 2 leucovorin, and 50 mg/m 2 docetaxel intravenously on day 1 as an option from 2018) or trimodality therapy (41·4 Gy in 23 fractions on days 1−5, 8−12, 15–19, 22–26, and 29–31 with intravenous area under the curve 2 mg/mL per min carboplatin plus intravenous 50 mg/m 2 paclitaxel on days 1, 8, 15, 22, and 29). The primary endpoint was overall survival, assessed in all randomly assigned patients who received at least one dose of study drug, regardless of which study drug they received, by intention to treat. Secondary endpoints were disease-free survival, site of treatment failure, operative complications, toxicity, pathological response (complete [ypT0N0] and major [tumour regression grade 1 and 2]), margin-free resection (R0), and health-related quality of life. Toxicity and safety data were analysed in the safety population, defined as patients who took at least one dose of study drug, according to treatment actually received. The initial power calculation was based on superiority of trimodality therapy (n=366 patients); it was adjusted after FLOT became an option to a non-inferiority design with a margin of 5% for perioperative chemotherapy (n=540). This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov , NCT01726452 . Findings Between Jan 24, 2013, and Dec 23, 2020, 377 patients were randomly assigned, of whom 362 were included in the intention-to treat population (327 [90%] male and 360 [99%] White): 184 in the perioperative chemotherapy group and 178 in the trimodality therapy group. The trial closed prematurely in December, 2020, after the second interim futility analysis (143 deaths), on the basis of similar survival metrics and the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. At a median follow-up of 38·8 months (IQR 16·3–55·1), median overall survival was 48·0 months (95% CI 33·6–64·8) in the perioperative chemotherapy group and 49·2 months (34·8–74·4) in the trimodality therapy group (3-year overall survival 55% [95% CI 47–62] vs 57% [49–64]; hazard ratio 1·03 [95% CI 0·77–1·38]; log-rank p=0·82). Median disease-free survival was 32·4 months (95% CI 22·8–64·8) in the perioperative chemotherapy group and 24·0 months (18·0–40·8) in the trimodality therapy group [hazard ratio 0·89 [95% CI 0·68–1·17]; log-rank p=0·41). The pattern of recurrence, locoregional or systemic, was not significantly different (odds ratio 1·35 [95% CI 0·63–2·91], p=0·44). Pathological complete response (odds ratio 0·33 [95% CI 0·14–0·81], p=0·012), major pathological response (0·21 [0·12–0·38], p<0·0001), and R0 rates (0·21 [0·08–0·53], p=0·0003) favoured trimodality therapy. The most common grade 3−4 adverse event was neutropenia (49 [27%] of 183 patients in the perioperative chemotherapy group vs 11 [6%] of 178 patients in the trimodality therapy group), followed by diarrhoea (20 [11%] vs none), and pulmonary embolism (ten [5%] vs nine [5%]). One (1%) patient in the perioperative chemotherapy group and three (2%) patients in the trimodality therapy group died from serious adverse events, two (one in each group) of which were possibly related to treatment. No differences were seen in operative mortality (five [3%] deaths in the perioperative chemotherapy group vs four [2%] in the trimodality therapy group), major morbidity, -Abstract Truncated-

Perioperative outcomes in patients who undergo neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy versus chemotherapy versus up‐front surgery in patients with oesophageal cancer

Comparison of Two Different Neoadjuvant Chemoradiatiotherapy Regimens for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: Results of a Phase II, Multicenter, Randomized Trial.

Phase III Randomized Study of Preoperative Versus Postoperative Chemoradiotherapy in Resectable Locally Advanced Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Versus Surgery Alone For Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer: A Retrospective Comparative Study

Comparison of Surgeries Plus Perioperative and Postoperative Chemotherapies in Chinese Pn2 Patients with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Real-World Observational Study.

The comparisons of neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy versus chemoradiotherapy for oesophageal squamous cancer

Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy versus Chemoradiation Prior to Esophagectomy: Impact on Rate of Complete Pathologic Response and Survival in Esophageal Cancer Patients

Comparison of esophageal cancer survival after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy plus surgery versus definitive chemoradiotherapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Patients with Non-response to Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation for Esophageal Cancer Have No Survival Advantage over Patients Undergoing Primary Esophagectomy

Impact of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on perioperative morbidity after major surgery for head and neck cancer

Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy for Resectable Gastric Cancer

Comparing survival between neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by open or thoracoscopic oesophagectomy in patients with oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma

Concurrent neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy could improve survival outcomes for patients with esophageal cancer: a meta-analysis based on random clinical trials

Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy vs Chemotherapy for Esophageal Adenocarcinoma

Trimodality therapy versus perioperative chemotherapy in the management of locally advanced adenocarcinoma of the oesophagus and oesophagogastric junction (Neo-AEGIS): an open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial

Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy Versus Postoperative Chemoradiotherapy for Local Advanced Gastric or Siewert II/III GEJ Cancer: A Retrospective Analysis.

Effects of neoadjuvant chemotherapy vs chemoradiotherapy in the treatment of esophageal adenocarcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Impact of anaemia in oesophago-gastric cancer patients undergoing curative treatment by means of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and surgery

[A Multi-Centered Randomized Controlled Study of Neo-Adjuvant Chemoradiotherapy Followed by Surgery Versus Surgery Alone for Locally Advanced Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Esophagus: an Interim Analysis].

Comparison of neoadjuvant chemotherapy versus upfront surgery with or without chemotherapy for patients with clinical stage III esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy plus surgery versus surgery alone for clinical node‐negative esophageal carcinoma