New insights into the relationship between Anti-Mullerian Hormone and Polycystic ovary syndrome and its diagnostic accuracy: An updated and extended meta-analysis using marginal beta-binomial model

Mostafa Barghi,Zahra Heidari,Fahimeh Haghighatdoost,Awat Feizi,Mahin Hashemipour
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2024.10.004
IF: 9.8
2024-10-11
American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Abstract:OBJECTIVE To investigate the diagnostic role of Anti-Mullerian Hormone (AMH) in Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) using advanced marginal beta-binomial statistical model and present the optimal cut-off by different age groups, geographical locations, body mass index (BMI) and other relevant factors. DATA SOURCES A comprehensive and systematic literature search was conducted in ISI Web of Science, PubMed/Medline, Scopus, Cochrane Library, Embase and ProQuest until August 2024. STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA Epidemiological studies whose diagnostic criterion for PCOS was Androgen Excess Society (AES) or National Institute of Health (NIH) or Rotterdam were included in the current meta-analysis. If studies had information about the sensitivity and specificity of AMH or related data thorough which we could calculate these parameters and/or data on odds ratio and mean were eligible to be included. METHODS The diagnostic role of AMH was assessed using the marginal beta-binomial statistical model and summary receiver operating characteristics (SROC) method in terms of pooled sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) with 95% confidence interval (CI). Pooled weighted mean difference (WMD) and pooled odds ratios (ORs) with 95% CI were estimated using random effects model. RESULTS A total of 202 observational studies were included in the pooled analysis, of which 106 studies (including 19465 cases and 29318 controls) were used for meta-analysis of sensitivity/specificity and 186 studies (including 30656 cases and 34360 controls) for meta-analysis of mean difference. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, and DOR for AMH were 0.79 (95% CI: 0.52 to 0.97), 0.82 (95% CI: 0.64 to 0.99) and 17.12 (95% CI: 14.37 to 20.32), respectively. The area under curve (AUC) based on the SROC model was 0.90 (95% CI: 0.87 to 0.93). AMH levels were significantly higher in women with PCOS than control women (WMD= 4.91; 95% CI: 4.57–5.27). In addition, individuals with a higher level of AMH were more likely to be affected by PCOS (OR=23.17; 95% CI: 18.74-28.66; I 2 = 94%; P 5.39 ng/mL was associated with PCOS (sensitivity= 88.6%; specificity= 92.75%; likelihood ratio for a positive test result (LR+)= 12.21; and likelihood ratio for a negative test result (LR-)= 0.12). CONCLUSION According to the results of this meta-analysis, serum AMH concentration is a valuable biomarker for the diagnosis of PCOS. The cut-off points suggested by the current meta-analysis need to be evaluated and validated by future studies and before their implementation in clinical practice.
obstetrics & gynecology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?