Abstract:ID 93958 Poster Board 481 A 3 adenosine receptor (AR) agonists are being developed for the treatment of autoimmune inflammatory diseases, chronic pain and cancer. A 3 AR agonists are not limited by cardiovascular side effects observed with other adenosine (A 1 and A 2A ) agonists that were in clinical trials. 2-Arylethynyl (North)-methanocarba adenosines have been explored as highly selective A 3 AR agonists, which is largely a function of the pseudoribose (bicyclic fused cyclopropane and cyclopentane) ring that pre-establishes a preferred (N) conformation for receptor recognition. Here, we compare analogues in the 5¢methylamide series having bulky C2-substitution, which either contain or lack an ethynyl spacer between adenine and a cyclic group. 2-Aryl compounds 11 , 13 , 14 , 19 , 22 , 23 , 27 , 29 , 31 and 34 , lacking an ethynyl spacer, displayed potent K i values of 2–30 nM at the human (h) A 3 AR, while other derivatives had greatly reduced affinity. The mouse (m) A 3 AR affinity was highly variable, with 2-arylethynyl groups greatly favoring high affinity ( 7 , 8 > 3c , 3d > 3b ) compared to 2-aryl analogues. However, 4¢truncated derivatives lacking a 2-ethynyl spacer had greatly reduced hA 3 AR affinity, even for those analogues containing affinity-enhancing N 6 -dopamine-derived substituents. This suggests that the 5¢methylamide group is especially important for anchoring these analogues in a deep hydrophilic subpocket in the receptor. hA 3 AR homology modeling indicated that 2-aryl and 2-arylethynyl groups have different conformations and receptor environments. The directly connected 2-aryl groups interact with ECL2 of the hA 3 AR, as opposed to the 2-arylethynyl groups, which interact with TM2. Functional assays of selected compounds in G protein-dependent and independent signaling were performed using engineered HEK293T cell lines. In a hA 3 AR miniG α i recruitment assay, 31 (MRS8062) was (slightly) more potent compared to a β-arrestin2 recruitment assay, and its maximal efficacy (E max ) was much higher (165%) than reference nonselective agonist NECA. Thus, in the 2-aryl series, A 3 AR affinity and selectivity were variable and generally reduced compared to the 2-arylethynyl series, with a greater dependence on the specific aryl group present. Selected compounds were protective in an vivo ischemic model of peripheral artery disease (PAD), in which other A 3 AR agonists demonstrated efficacy. Compounds 3a – 3c in the rigidified 2-arylethynyl series significantly decreased the % cell death in this model of skeletal muscle ischemia reperfusion injury/claudication, as previously shown only for moderately A 3 AR-selective ribosides or (N)-methanocarba derivatives (all lacking the 2-arylethynyl group). Thus, we have expanded A 3 AR agonist SAR for (N)-methanocarba adenosines and their application to skeletal muscle ischemia. NIDDK Intramural Res. ZIADK031117

2-Aryladenine Derivatives as a Potent Scaffold for Adenosine Receptor Antagonists: The 6-Morpholino Derivatives

Novel Quinazoline Derivatives as Highly Effective A2A Adenosine Receptor Antagonists

Synthesis of Alkyne Derivatives of a Novel Triazolopyrazine As A2A Adenosine Receptor Antagonists.

2-Substituted (N)-Methanocarba A3 Adenosine Receptor Agonists: In Silico, In Vitro, and In Vivo Characterization

Novel selective antagonist radioligands for the pharmacological study of A2B adenosine receptors

Design, synthesis and biological evaluation of novel scaffold benzo[4,5]imidazo [1,2-a]pyrazin-1-amine: Towards adenosine A2A receptor (A2A AR) antagonist

2-Substituted -Methanocarba A3 Adenosine Receptor Agonists: In silico, in vitro and in vivo Characterization

Structure−Activity Relationships of New 1<i>H</i>-Imidazo[4,5-<i>c</i>]quinolin-4-amine Derivatives as Allosteric Enhancers of the A<sub>3</sub>Adenosine Receptor

Structure-activity relationships of new 1H-imidazo[4,5-c]quinolin-4-amine derivatives as allosteric enhancers of the A3 adenosine receptor.

Hit-to-Lead Optimization of Heterocyclic Carbonyloxycarboximidamides as Selective Antagonists at Human Adenosine A3 Receptor

Structural Modification and Biological Evaluation of 2,8-Disubstituted Adenine and Its Nucleosides as A 2A Adenosine Receptor Antagonists: Exploring the Roles of Ribose at Adenosine Receptors

Progress in the pursuit of therapeutic adenosine receptor antagonists

Comparison of the Selectivity of Human Adenosine Receptor Antagonists Based on Structure and Pharmacophore Features

Medicinal chemistry of adenosine A3 receptor ligands

Species differences in brain adenosine A1 receptor pharmacology revealed by use of xanthine and pyrazolopyridine based antagonists

Structure activity relationships of 5-HT2B and 5-HT2C serotonin receptor antagonists: N6, C2 and 5′-Modified (N)-methanocarba-adenosine derivatives

Comparative Pharmacophore Modeling of Human Adenosine Receptor A1 and A3 Antagonists

Design, Synthesis, and Bioevaluation of 2-Aminopteridin-7(8h)-one Derivatives As Novel Potent Adenosine A2A Receptor Antagonists for Cancer Immunotherapy

Structure-Activity Studies of 1 H -Imidazo[4,5- c ]quinolin-4-amine Derivatives as A 3 Adenosine Receptor Positive Allosteric Modulators

Allosteric enhancement of adenosine A1 receptor binding and function by 2-amino-3-benzoylthiophenes

A2A adenosine receptor agonists, antagonists, inverse agonists and partial agonists