Stochastic models of the binding kinetics of VEGF-A to VEGFR1 and VEGFR2 in endothelial cells

Martin Lopez-Garcia,Maria Nowicka,Claus Bendtsen,Grant Lythe,Sreenivasan Ponnambalam,Carmen Molina-Paris
DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1606.07269
IF: 6.064
2016-06-23
Biomolecules
Abstract:Vascular endothelial growth factor receptors (VEGFRs) are receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs) that regulate proliferation, migration, angiogenesis and vascular permeability of endothelial cells. VEGFR1 and VEGFR2 bind vascular endothelial growth factors (VEGFs), inducing receptor dimerisation and activation, characterised by phosphorylation of tyrosine residues in their cytoplasmic domain. Although experimental evidence suggests that RTK signalling occurs both on the plasma membrane and intra-cellularly, and reveals the role of endocytosis in RTK signal transduction, we still lack knowledge of VEGFR phosphorylation-site use and of the spatiotemporal regulation of VEGFR signalling. In this paper, we introduce four stochastic mathematical models to study the binding kinetics of vascular endothelial growth factor VEGF-A to VEGFR1 and VEGFR2, and phosphorylation. The formation of phosphorylated dimers on the cell surface is a two-step process: diffusive transport and binding. The first two of our models only consider VEGFR2, which allows us to introduce new stochastic descriptors making use of a matrix-analytic approach. The two remaining models describe the competition of VEGFR1 and VEGFR2 for ligand availability, and are analysed making use of Gillespie simulations and the van Kampen approximation. Under the hypothesis that bound phosphorylated receptor dimers are the signalling units, we study the time to reach a threshold number of such complexes. Our results indicate that the presence of VEGFR1 does not only affect the timescale to reach a given signalling threshold, but it also affects the maximum attainable threshold. This result is consistent with the conjectured role of VEGFR1 as a decoy receptor, that prevents VEGF-A binding to VEGFR2, and thus, VEGFR2 attaining suitable phosphorylation levels. We identify an optimum range of ligand concentration for sustained dimer phosphorylation.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?