Abstract:Aedes aegypti are indoor-dwelling vectors of many arboviruses, including Zika (ZIKV) and chikungunya (CHIKV). The dynamics of these viruses within the mosquito are known to be temperature-dependent, and models that address risk and predictions of the transmission efficiency and patterns typically use meteorological temperature data. These data do not differentiate the temperatures experienced by mosquitoes in different microclimates, such as indoor vs. outdoor. Using temperature data collected from Neiva Colombia, we investigated the impact of two microclimate temperature profiles on ZIKV and CHIKV infection dynamics in Ae. aegypti. We found that the vector mortality was not significantly impacted by the difference in temperature profiles. Further, we found that the infection and dissemination rates were largely unaffected, with only ZIKV experiencing a significant increase in infection at outdoor temperatures at 21 days post-infection (dpi). Further, there was a significant increase in viral titers in the abdomens of ZIKV-infected mosquitoes at 21 dpi. With CHIKV, there was a significant titer difference in the abdomens of mosquitoes at both 7 and 14 dpi. While there were differences in vector infection kinetics that were not statistically significant, we developed a simple stochastic SEIR-SEI model to determine if the observed differences might translate to notable differences in simulated outbreaks. With ZIKV, while the probability of secondary transmission was high (>90%) under both microenvironmental scenarios, there was often only one secondary case. However, CHIKV differences between microenvironments were more prominent. With over 90% probability of secondary transmission, at indoor conditions, the peak of transmission was higher (over 850 cases) compared to the outdoor conditions (<350 cases). Further, the time-to-peak for indoor was 130 days compared to 217 days for outdoor scenarios. Further investigations into microenvironmental conditions, including temperature, may be key to increasing our understanding of the nuances of CHIKV and ZIKV vectorial capacity, epidemiology, and risk assessment, especially as it affects other aspects of transmission, such as biting rate. Overall, it is critical to understand the variability of how extrinsic factors affect transmission systems, and these data add to the growing catalog of knowledge of how temperature affects arboviral systems.

Investigating the Effects of Microclimate on Arboviral Kinetics in Aedes aegypti