Abstract:With the growth in the use of health economic evaluation to inform healthcare resource allocation decisions, the challenges in applying standard methods to child health have become apparent. A unique limitation is the paucity of child-specific preference-based measures. A single, valid, preference-based measure of utility that can be used in children of all ages does not exist. Thus, the ability to derive a QALY for use in cost-utility analysis (CUA) is compromised. This paper presents and discusses existing and novel options for deriving utilities for paediatric health states for use in CUAs. While a direct elicitation may be preferred, a child's ability to complete a standard gamble or time trade-off task is hampered by cognitive and age limitations. The abstract notions contained in indirect instruments such as the EQ-5D and Health Utilities Index may also pose challenges for young children. Novel approaches to overcome these challenges include the development of age-appropriate instruments such as the EQ-5D-Y, the development of new child-specific utility instruments such as the Child Health Utility-9D and the re-calibration of existing adult instruments to derive preference weights for health states from children themselves. For children aged <6 years, researchers have little choice but to use a proxy reporter such as parents. While parents may be reliable reporters for physical activity limitations and externally manifest symptoms, their ability to accurately report on subjective outcomes such as emotion is questionable. Catalogues of utility weights for a range of conditions are increasingly becoming available but retain many of the same limitations as valuing health states from children or from proxies. Given the dynamic relationship in quality of life (QOL) between family members when a child is ill, it seems appropriate to consider a 'family perspective' rather than an individual perspective in child health state valuation. In a collective approach, health state utilities derived from multiple family members may be combined mathematically. Alternatively, in a unitary approach, a single utility estimate may be determined to represent the family's perspective. This may include deriving utilities through parent-child dyad estimation or by using a household model that combines the utility weights of the patient and family members, incorporating reciprocal QOL effects. While these various approaches to child health state valuation represent novel research developments, the measurement challenges and threats to validity persist. Given the importance of non-health benefits to child health, especially in the domains of education and public policy, it may be worthwhile to consider an approach that allows incorporation of externalities to produce a cost-benefit analysis. The use of discrete-choice methods to assess willingness to pay for novel child health interventions holds promise as a means to produce meaningful economic evidence. Regardless of the approach taken, the highest degree of methodological rigour is essential. The increasing attention being paid by health economic researchers to the measurement challenges of paediatric health state valuation can only increase the value of child health economic evidence for decision making.

Comparing heuristic valuation processes between health state valuation from child and adult perspectives

Incorporating public and wider stakeholder views in the design of health state valuation studies in adults and young people: an undervalued resource?

A happiness approach to valuing health states for children

A novel approach for health state valuation: Multiple bounded dichotomous choice compared to the traditional standard gamble

Challenges in health state valuation in paediatric economic evaluation: are QALYs contraindicated?

Probabilistic choice models in health-state valuation research: background, theories, assumptions and applications

Child health valuation protocol for a discrete choice experiment comparing paired comparison and kaizen tasks and estimating US EQ-5D-Y-3L values on an experience scale

Valuation of preference-based measures: can existing preference data be used to generate better estimates?

Comparison of four approaches in eliciting health state utilities with SF-6Dv2

One Method, Many Methodological Choices: A Structured Review of Discrete-Choice Experiments for Health State Valuation

The Corrective Approach: Policy Implications of Recent Developments in QALY Measurement Based on Prospect Theory

An Investigation of Age Dependency in Dutch and Chinese Values for EQ-5D-Y

A comparison of self-reported and proxy-reported health utilities in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Valuation of EQ-5D-5L Health States: a Comparison of Seven Asian Populations.

Capturing Valuation Study Sampling Uncertainty in the Estimation of Health State Utility Values Using the EQ-5D-3L

Threats to the estimation of benefit: are preference elicitation methods accurate?

An elicitation of utility for quality of life under prospect theory

Valuation of EQ-5D-5L Health States: A Comparison of Three Asian Countries

Health state utility estimates for value assessments of novel treatments in Huntington's disease: a systematic literature review

Exploring health state utility values of parents of children with a serious illness

Head-to-Head Comparison of EQ-5D-3L and EQ-5D-5L Health Values