Abstract:Inertial Measurement Units (IMUs) have gained popularity in gait analysis and human motion tracking, and they provide certain advantages over stationary line-of-sight-dependent Optical Motion Capture (OMC) systems. IMUs appear as an appropriate alternative solution to reduce dependency on bulky, room-based hardware and facilitate the analysis of walking patterns in clinical settings and daily life activities. However, most inertial gait analysis methods are unpractical in clinical settings due to the necessity of precise sensor placement, the need for well-performed calibration movements and poses, and due to distorted magnetometer data in indoor environments as well as nearby ferromagnetic material and electronic devices. To address these limitations, recent literature has proposed methods for self-calibrating magnetometer-free inertial motion tracking, and acceptable performance has been achieved in mechanical joints and in individuals without neurological disorders. However, the performance of such methods has not been validated in clinical settings for individuals with neurological disorders, specifically individuals with incomplete Spinal Cord Injury (iSCI). In the present study, we used recently proposed inertial motion-tracking methods, which avoid magnetometer data and leverage kinematic constraints for anatomical calibration. We used these methods to determine the range of motion of the Flexion/Extension (F/E) hip and Abduction/Adduction (A/A) angles, the F/E knee angles, and the Dorsi/Plantar (D/P) flexion ankle joint angles during walking. Data (IMU and OMC) of five individuals with no neurological disorders (control group) and five participants with iSCI walking for two minutes on a treadmill in a self-paced mode were analyzed. For validation purposes, the OMC system was considered as a reference. The mean absolute difference (MAD) between calculated range of motion of joint angles was 5.00°, 5.02°, 5.26°, and 3.72° for hip F/E, hip A/A, knee F/E, and ankle D/P flexion angles, respectively. In addition, relative stance, swing, double support phases, and cadence were calculated and validated. The MAD for the relative gait phases (stance, swing, and double support) was 1.7%, and the average cadence error was 0.09 steps/min. The MAD values for RoM and relative gait phases can be considered as clinically acceptable. Therefore, we conclude that the proposed methodology is promising, enabling non-restrictive inertial gait analysis in clinical settings.

Validity of the estimated angular information obtained using an inertial motion capture system during standing trunk forward and backward bending

Reliability and validity of estimated angles information assessed using inertial measurement unit-based motion sensors

Investigating Concurrent Validity Of Inertial Sensors To Evaluate Multiplanar Spine Movement

Validity of Inertial Measurement Unit (IMU Sensor) for Measurement of Cervical Spine Motion, Compared with Eight Optoelectronic 3D Cameras Under Spinal Immobilization Devices

Errors in Estimating Lower-Limb Joint Angles and Moments during Walking Based on Pelvic Accelerations: Influence of Virtual Inertial Measurement Unit's Frontal Plane Misalignment

Validation of algorithms for calculating spatiotemporal gait parameters during continuous turning using lumbar and foot mounted inertial measurement units

Validity of an inertial measurement system to measure lower-limb kinematics in patients with hip and knee pathology

Assessing the Reliability and Validity of Inertial Measurement Units to Measure Three-Dimensional Spine and Hip Kinematics during Clinical Movement Tasks

Determining Inertial Measurement Unit Placement for Estimating Human Trunk Sway While Standing, Walking and Running.

Validation of Non-Restrictive Inertial Gait Analysis of Individuals with Incomplete Spinal Cord Injury in Clinical Settings

Inertial Measurement Units for Clinical Movement Analysis: Reliability and Concurrent Validity

Strengths and Weaknesses of 3D Pose Estimation and Inertial Motion Capture System for Movement Therapy

Validity and Reliability of Inertial Measurement Unit (IMU)-Derived 3D Joint Kinematics in Persons Wearing Transtibial Prosthesis

Reliability and Validity of an Inertial Measurement System to Quantify Lower Extremity Joint Angle in Functional Movements

Concurrent validation of Xsens MVN measurement of lower limb joint angular kinematics.

Validation of Inertial Measurement Units for Upper Body Kinematics

Validity and Sensitivity of an Inertial Measurement Unit-Driven Biomechanical Model of Motor Variability for Gait

The Forward and Lateral Tilt Angle of the Neck and Trunk Measured by Three-Dimensional Gait and Motion Analysis as a Candidate for a Severity Index in Patients with Parkinson’s Disease

A Procedure to Validate Three-Dimensional Motion Assessment Systems

Reliability and validity of a method to measure trunk rotation angle from images using a camera and posture mirror

Predicted Threshold for Seated Stability: Estimation of Margin of Stability Using Wearable Inertial Sensors