Abstract:With the rapid development of artificial intelligence (AI) technology, AI educators have become a reality. The advancement and increasing applications of AI technology in higher education not only provide more efficient tools for teachers in long-term and focused teaching, but also provide new active and independent spaces for sustainable self-motivated learning for college students. It is of great importance that the effects of AI educator design are understood to ensure the sustainable development and deployment of AI-driven courses at universities. This paper investigates the influences of AI educators' autonomy design on students' usage intentions by delving into how the artificial autonomy of AI educators satisfies students' needs. Drawing on the uses and gratification (U&G) framework, we theoretically elaborate on how AI educator autonomy (i.e., sensing autonomy, thought autonomy, and action autonomy) influences students' intentions to use an AI educator through the mediating effects of U&G benefits (i.e., information-seeking gratification, social interaction gratification, and entertainment gratification). By conducting an online survey (N = 673) on college students, we found that the sensing autonomy of AI educators is positively associated with usage intention due to the mediating effects of social interaction and entertainment gratifications; the thought autonomy of AI educators is positively related to usage intention, mediated by information-seeking and social interaction gratifications, and the action autonomy of AI educators is positively linked with usage intention through the paths of information-seeking and entertainment gratifications. Our findings provide both theoretical contributions and practical implications.
environmental sciences,environmental studies,green & sustainable science & technology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem that this paper attempts to solve is: **How does the autonomous design of artificial intelligence educators (AI educators) affect students' willingness to use AI educators by meeting their internal needs, thereby promoting the sustainable development of higher education?**
Specifically, the article focuses on how the autonomous characteristics of AI educators in college teaching (perceptual autonomy, thinking autonomy, and action autonomy) affect students' intention to use AI educators through different dimensions (information - seeking gratification, social interaction gratification, and entertainment gratification) under the Uses and Gratification (U&G) theoretical framework. The research aims to answer the following key questions:
1. **Perceptual Autonomy**: Can AI educators enhance students' social interaction and entertainment gratification by perceiving environmental changes (such as recognizing students' emotions, learning states, etc.), and then increase their willingness to use?
2. **Thinking Autonomy**: Can AI educators independently formulate learning plans according to students' learning progress, habits, and current states, thereby enhancing information - seeking and social interaction gratification, and then increasing their willingness to use?
3. **Action Autonomy**: Can AI educators enhance information - seeking and entertainment gratification by independently performing teaching tasks (such as playing videos, reminding to complete practice questions, etc.), thereby increasing their willingness to use?
### Research Background
With the rapid development of artificial intelligence technology, AI educators not only provide teachers with more efficient tools, but also provide college students with more active and independent learning spaces. However, at present, there is still a lack of in - depth research on how the design characteristics of AI educators affect students' willingness to use them, especially in terms of meeting students' internal needs.
### Research Methods
To explore this problem, based on the U&G theory, the authors proposed a theoretical framework and collected data from college students through an online survey (N = 673) for empirical analysis. The research results show that:
- Perceptual autonomy positively affects students' usage intention through social interaction and entertainment gratification.
- Thinking autonomy positively affects students' usage intention through information - seeking and social interaction gratification.
- Action autonomy positively affects students' usage intention through information - seeking and entertainment gratification.
### Conclusions and Contributions
This research not only provides a theoretical basis for the design of AI educators, but also provides practical guidance for the sustainable application of AI technology in higher education and college students' autonomous learning. By understanding how the autonomy of AI educators meets students' different needs, AI education tools can be better designed and promoted, thereby promoting the improvement of educational equity and efficiency.
### Formula Display
The specific formulas involved in the article are as follows:
Hypothesis 1 (H1):
\[ \text{Sensing Autonomy} \rightarrow \text{Social Interaction Gratification} \rightarrow \text{Usage Intention} \]
Hypothesis 2 (H2):
\[ \text{Sensing Autonomy} \rightarrow \text{Entertainment Gratification} \rightarrow \text{Usage Intention} \]
Hypothesis 3 (H3):
\[ \text{Thought Autonomy} \rightarrow \text{Information - Seeking Gratification} \rightarrow \text{Usage Intention} \]
Hypothesis 4 (H4):
\[ \text{Thought Autonomy} \rightarrow \text{Social Interaction Gratification} \rightarrow \text{Usage Intention} \]
Hypothesis 5 (H5):
\[ \text{Action Autonomy}