TP53 and KMT2D mutations associated with worse prognosis in peripheral T‐cell lymphomas

Lingling Wang,Lei Yang,Fangshu Guan,Jing Chen,Yuexin Cheng,Yuqing Miao,Jingsong He,Zhen Cai,He Huang,Yi Zhao
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.70027
IF: 4.711
2024-07-24
Cancer Medicine
Abstract:PTCL is a rare and highly heterogeneous group of hematologic malignancies that are aggressive and characterized by a poor prognosis. Our research provides critical evidence that patients with KMT2D and TP53 mutations indicate poor outcomes. According to our observations in southern Chinese cities, mutation profiling and GEP may help differentiate distinct types of PTCL and serve as a useful tool for determining treatment options and prognoses. There are limited studies on mutation profiling for Peripheral T‐cell lymphomas (PTCL) in the Chinese population. We retrospectively analyzed the clinical and genetic landscape of 66 newly diagnosed Chinese patients. Targeted next‐generation sequencing (NGS) was performed for tissues from these patients. At least one mutation was detected in 60 (90.9%) patients, with a median number of 3 (0–7) mutations, and 32 (48.5%) cases detected with more than 4 mutations. The genes with higher mutation frequencies were TET2, RHOA, DNMT3A, IDH2, TP53, STAT3, and KMT2D respectively. When mutant genes are classified by functional group, the most prevalent mutations are related to epigenetics and signal transduction. IPI ≥2, PIT ≥2, and failure to achieve partial remission (PR) were factors for inferior progression‐free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Multivariate analysis showed TP53 was an adverse factor for PFS (HR, 3.523; 95% CI, 1.262–9.835; p = 0.016), and KMT2D was an adverse factor for OS (HR, 10.097; 95% CI, 1.000–101.953; p = 0.048). Mutation profiling could help differentiate distinct types of PTCL and serve as a useful tool for determining treatment options and prognoses.
oncology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?