Nasal airway obstruction in patients with cleft lip nasal deformity: a systematic review

Harry Chiang,Reanna Shah,Claire Washabaugh,Dennis O Frank-Ito,Dennis O. Frank-Ito

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2024.02.061

2024-02-01

Abstract:BACKGROUND: Cleft lip nasal deformity (CLND)-associated nasal airway obstruction (CL-NAO) may be inadequately characterized, with its functional implications subsequently underappreciated and neglected. The purpose of this systematic review is to (1) summarize the available assessment results in CL-NAO, (2) evaluate the reliability of current assessment tools, and (3) identify ongoing gaps and inconsistencies for future study.METHODS: A systematic search of the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Scopus databases was performed for articles studying CL-NAO. Articles focusing on noncleft populations or surgical techniques were excluded. Extracted data included information about study design, patient demographics, medical history, and assessment scores.RESULTS: Twenty-six articles met criteria for inclusion. Assessments included patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), anatomic characterizations of CLND, and nasal airflow and resistance studies. Objective assessments were generally more reliable than subjective assessments in CLND. Unilateral CLND was better represented in the literature than bilateral CLND. For unilateral CLND, the cleft side was more obstructed than the noncleft side, with stereotyped patterns of anterior nasal deformity but varied middle and posterior deformity patterns. Overall, there was considerable heterogeneity in study design regarding stratification of CLND cohorts by age, cleft phenotype and laterality, and surgical history.CONCLUSIONS: A wide range of subjective and objective assessment tools were used to characterize CL-NAO, including PROMs, anatomic measurements, and airflow and resistance metrics. Overall, objective assessments of CL-NAO were more reliable than subjective surveys, which may have resulted from variable expectations regarding nasal patency in the CLND population combined with large heterogeneity in study design.

surgery