Abstract:Study objective: There is great consensus that the implementation of the enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) approach is beneficial for surgical patients, but there is a paucity of data concerning its application in women with deep endometriosis (DE) who are candidates for bowel surgery. The survey described herein was aimed at gathering detailed information on perioperative management of DE patients who were undergoing sigmoid/rectal (discoid or segmental) resection within the Italian Society of Gynecologic Endoscopy (SEGI) group. Design: Baseline survey. Setting: National survey conducted within the main Italian cooperative group in minimally invasive gynecologic surgery (SEGI). Patients: The study did not involve patients. Interventions: A 63-item questionnaire covering ERAS items for gynecologic/elective colorectal surgery was sent to SEGI centers. Only questionnaires from centers that reported performing ≥10 sigmoid/rectal resections per year were considered for this analysis. Measurements and main results: Thirty-three of 38 (86.8%) of the questionnaires were analyzed. The rates of concordance with the ERAS guidelines were 40.4%, 64.4%, and 62.6% for preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative items, respectively. The proportion of overall agreement was 56.6%. Preoperative diet, fasting and bowel preparation, correction of anemia, avoidance of peritoneal drains, postoperative feeding, and early mobilization were the most controversial items. Comparative analysis revealed that the referred rates of complete disease removal and conversion to open surgery were significantly different depending on case volume (p = .044 and p = .003, respectively) and gynecologist's/surgeon's experience (p = .042 and p = .022, respectively), with higher chances of obtaining a complete laparoscopic/robotic excision of endometriosis in centers that reported ≥30 DE surgeries performed per year and/or ≥90% of bowel resections performed by a gynecologist/general surgeon specifically dedicated to DE management. In contrast, the rates of concordance with the ERAS guidelines were not significantly different according to case volume (p = .081) or gynecologist's/surgeon's experience (p = .294). Conclusion: This is the first study on DE conducted on a national scale. The current survey results revealed suboptimal compliance with the ERAS recommendations and underline the need to improve the quality of perioperative care in DE patients undergoing sigmoid/rectal resection. This study is a first step toward building a consistent, structured reporting platform for the SEGI units and facilitating wide implementation and standardization of the ERAS protocol for DE patients in Italy.

Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) for deep infiltrating endometriosis surgery: experience of a French center.

Impact of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) program in gynecologic oncology and patient satisfaction.

Not All Bad Comes to Harm: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery for Rectosigmoid Endometriosis

Perioperative outcomes in gynecologic pelvic exenteration before and after implementation of an enhanced recovery after surgery program

The impact of Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) pathways with regard to perioperative outcome in patients with ovarian cancer

Prehabilitation in an ERAS program for endometrial cancer patients: impact on post-operative recovery

Implementation of enhanced recovery after surgery in gynecological operations: a randomized controlled trial

Patient outcomes and adherence to an enhanced recovery pathway for open gynecologic surgery: a 6-year single-center experience

Prospective evaluation of an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathway in a Norwegian cohort of patients with suspected or advanced ovarian cancer

Evaluation of Peri-Operative Management in Women with Deep Endometriosis Who are Candidates for Bowel Surgery: A Survey from the Italian Society of Gynecologic Endoscopy

Thirty-day outcomes after gynecologic oncology surgery: A single-center experience of enhanced recovery after surgery pathways

Implementation of an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol in a gynaecology department - the follow-up at 1 year

Outcomes of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) in gynecologic oncology - A systematic review and meta-analysis

Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Practices in Minimally Invasive Gynaecologic Surgery: A National Survey

Enhanced Recovery after Surgery is Feasible and Beneficial and Should Be the Standard in Major Gynecological Surgeries

Effect of Patient-Controlled Epidural Analgesia (PCEA) Based on ERAS on Postoperative Recovery of Patients Undergoing Gynecological Laparoscopic Surgery

Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Protocols in Obese Gynecological Oncology Patients: A Single-Center Experience

EVAN-G score in patients undergoing minimally invasive gynecology oncologic surgery in an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) program

Cohort study of impact on length of stay of individual enhanced recovery after surgery protocol components

Validation of an ERAS protocol in gynecological surgery: interim analysis of an italian randomized controlled trial

Implementation of a Multidisciplinary Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Program for Cytoreductive Surgery (CRS) With Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (HIPEC)