Abstract:PurposeSegmentation of contrast‐enhanced CT and measurement of SPECT point spread function (PSF) are usually required for conventional partial volume correction (PVC). This study was to develop a segmentation‐free method with blind deconvolution (BD) and anatomical‐based filtering for SPECT PVC.MethodsThe proposed method was implemented using an iterative BD algorithm to estimate the restored image and the PSF simultaneously. An anatomical‐based filtering was implemented at each iteration to reduce Gibbs artifact and suppress noise amplification in the deconvolution process. The proposed method was validated with 123I‐metaiodobenzylguanidine (123I‐mIBG) SPECT/CT imaging of NCAT phantoms with and without myocardial perfusion defect and a physical cardiac phantom. Fifteen heart‐to‐mediastinum ratios (HMRs) were configured in the NCAT and physical phantoms. Correlations between SPECT‐quantified and true HMRs were calculated from images without PVC as well as from BD restored images. The proposed method was also performed on a human 123I‐mIBG study.ResultsRelative bias and standard deviation images of NCAT phantoms showed that the proposed method reduced both bias and noise. Mean relative bias in the simulated normal myocardium was markedly improved (−16.8% ± 0.4% versus −0.8% ± 0.6% for low noise level; −16.7% ± 0.7% versus −2.3% ± 0.9% for high noise level). Mean relative bias in the simulated myocardial defect was also noticeably improved (−12.7% ± 1.2% versus 1.2% ± 1.6% for low noise level; −13.5% ± 2.4% versus −0.9% ± 2.8% for high noise level). The signal to noise ratio (SNR) of the defect was improved from 2.95 ± 0.09 to 4.07 ± 0.16 for low noise level (38% increase of mean), and from 2.56 ± 0.15 to 3.62 ± 0.22 for high noise level (41% increase of mean). For both NCAT and physical phantoms, HMRs calculated from images without PVC were underestimated (correlations between SPECT‐quantified and true HMRs: y = 0.81x + 0.1 for NCAT phantom; y = 0.82x + 0.14 for physical phantom). HMRs from BD restored images were markedly improved (correlations between SPECT‐quantified and true HMRs: y = x + 0.05 for NCAT phantom; y = 0.97x − 0.12 for physical phantom). After applying the proposed PVC method, the estimation error between the SPECT‐quantified and true HMRs was significantly reduced from −0.75 ± 0.57 to 0.04 ± 0.17 for NCAT phantom (P = 8e‐05), and from −0.68 ± 0.67 to −0.26 ± 0.42 for physical phantom (P = 0.005). The human study demonstrated that the HMR increased by 8% with PVC.ConclusionsThe proposed segmentation‐free PVC method has the potential of improving SPECT quantification accuracy and reducing noise without the need for premeasuring the image PSF.

Partial volume correction for Lu-177-PSMA SPECT

A Deep-Learning–Based Partial-Volume Correction Method for Quantitative 177 Lu SPECT/CT Imaging

Anatomy-based correction of kidney PVE on [Formula: see text] SPECT images

Anatomical-based Partial Volume Correction for Low-Dose Dedicated Cardiac SPECT/CT

Simultaneous Partial Volume Correction and Noise Regularization for Cardiac SPECT/CT

Noise suppressed partial volume correction for cardiac SPECT/CT.

Partial volume correction of PET image data using geometric transfer matrices based on uniform B-splines

Correction of partial volume effect in 99mTc-TRODAT-1 brain SPECT images using an edge-preserving weighted regularization

An investigation into the impact of partial volume correction on detection rate of epilepsy using 18F-FDG PET

PETPVC: a toolbox for performing partial volume correction techniques in positron emission tomography

Partial Volume Effect Corrected Metabolically Active Tumor Volume From Pet For Early-Stage Lung Cancer

The significance of partial volume effect on the estimation of hypoxic tumour volume with [18F]FMISO PET/CT

Correction of partial volume effect in the projections in PET studies

Implementation of a Spatially-Variant and Tissue-Dependent Positron Range Correction for PET/CT Imaging

A Blind Deconvolution Method Incorporated with Anatomical‐based Filtering for Partial Volume Correction: Validations with 123i‐mibg Cardiac SPECT/CT

Solving Outside-Axial-Field-Of-View Scatter Correction Problem in Pet Via Digital Experimentation

Deep Learning-Based Partial Volume Correction in Standard and Low-Dose PET-CT Imaging

Improved Quantification of Arterial Spin Labelling Images using Partial Volume Correction Techniques

Partial volume correction analysis for 11C-UCB-J PET studies of Alzheimer's disease

177Lu SPECT imaging in the presence of90Y: does90Y degrade image quantification? a simulation study

Performance evaluation of iterative PET reconstruction with resolution recovery incorporating Gallium‐68 positron range correction