The Danish Atrial Fibrillation Registry: A Multidisciplinary National Pragmatic Initiative for Monitoring and Supporting Quality of Care Based on Data Retrieved from Administrative Registries
Lars Frost,Albert Joensen,Ulla Dam-Schmidt,Ina Qvist,Margit Brinck,Axel Brandes,Ulla Davidsen,Ole Pedersen,Dorte Damgaard,Inge Mølgaard,Robert Bedsted,Anders Damgaard Møller Schlünsen,Miriam Grijota Chousa,Julie Andersen,Asger Pedersen,Søren Paaske Johnsen,Nicklas Vinter
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/clep.s443473
2023-12-23
Clinical Epidemiology
Abstract:Lars Frost, 1, 2 Albert Marni Joensen, 3 Ulla Dam-Schmidt, 4 Ina Qvist, 5 Margit Brinck, 6 Axel Brandes, 7, 8 Ulla Davidsen, 4 Ole Dyg Pedersen, 9 Dorte Damgaard, 10 Inge Mølgaard, 11 Robert Bedsted, 11 Anders Damgaard Møller Schlünsen, 12 Miriam Grijota Chousa, 12 Julie Andersen, 12 Asger Roer Pedersen, 1 Søren Paaske Johnsen, 13 Nicklas Vinter 1, 13 1 Diagnostic Centre, Silkeborg Regional Hospital, Silkeborg, Denmark; 2 Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark; 3 Department of Cardiology, North Denmark Regional Hospital, Hjørring, Denmark; 4 Department of Cardiology, Bispebjerg Hospital, Copenhagen University Hospitals, Copenhagen, Denmark; 5 Department of Cardiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark; 6 Department of Cardiology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark; 7 Department of Cardiology, Esbjerg Hospital – University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Esbjerg, Denmark; 8 Department of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark; 9 Department of Cardiology, Zealand University Hospital, Roskilde, Denmark; 10 Department of Neurology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark; 11 Patient Representative, Aalborg and Roskilde, Denmark; 12 The Danish Clinical Quality Program – National Clinical Registries (RKKP), Aarhus, Denmark; 13 Danish Center for Health Services Research, Department of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark Correspondence: Lars Frost, Diagnostic Centre, University Clinic for Development of Innovative Patient Pathways, Silkeborg Regional Hospital; Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Falkevej 3, Silkeborg, 8600, Denmark, Tel +45 23988590, Email Aim: The Danish Atrial Fibrillation (AF) Registry monitors and supports improvement of quality of care for all AF patients in Denmark. This report describes the registry's administrative and organizational structure, data sources, data flow, data analyses, annual reporting, and feedback between the registry, clinicians, and the administrative system. We also report the selection process of the quality indicators and the temporal trends in results from 2017– 2021. Methods and Results: The Danish AF Registry aims for complete registration and monitoring of care for all patients diagnosed with AF in Denmark. Administrative registries provide data on contacts to general practice, contacts to private cardiology practice, hospital contacts, medication prescriptions, updated vital status information, and biochemical test results. The Danish Stroke Registry provides information on stroke events. From 2017 to 2021, the proportion with a reported echocardiography among incident AF patients increased from 39.9% (95% CI: 39.3– 40.6) to 82.6% (95% CI: 82.1– 83.1). The initiation of oral anticoagulant therapy among patients with incident AF and a CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc score of ≥ 1 in men and ≥ 2 in women increased from 85.3% (95% CI: 84.6– 85.9) to 90.4% (95% CI: 89.9– 91.0). The 1-year and 2-year persistence increased from 85.2% (95% CI: 84.5– 85.9) to 88.7% (95% CI: 88.0– 89.3), and from 85.4% (95% CI: 84.7– 86.2) to 88.2% (95% CI: 87.5– 88.8), respectively. The 1-year risk of ischemic stroke among prevalent patients with AF decreased from 0.88% (95% CI: 0.83– 0.93) to 0.71% (95% CI: 0.66– 0.75). Variation in clinical performance between the five administrative Danish regions was reduced. Conclusion: Continuous nationwide monitoring of quality indicators for AF originating from administrative registries is feasible and supportive of improvements of quality of care. Keywords: atrial fibrillation, quality indicators, quality of care Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a natural candidate condition for quality-of-care monitoring and improvement because of the increasing prevalence, the associated poor prognosis, and the high health care and societal costs. 1–4 The 2020 European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of AF recommends, as a class IIa recommendation, that practitioners and institutions consider tools to measure quality of care and to identify opportunities for improvement of treatment quality and patient outcomes. 5,6 The ESC guidelines for AF suggest surveillance in six domains: patient assessment, anticoagulation, rate control, rhythm control, risk factor management, and outcomes. 5,6 The American College of Cardiology and the American Heart Association have jointly developed clinical pe -Abstract Truncated-
public, environmental & occupational health