Abstract P478: One-Year Outcome After Endovascular Treatment for Acute Basilar Artery Occlusion

Fengli Li,Hongfei Sang,Jiaxing Song,Zhangbao Guo,Shuai Liu,Weidong Luo,Junjie Yuan,Zhongming Qiu,Linyu Li,Wenjie Zi,Qingwu Yang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1161/str.52.suppl_1.p478
IF: 10.17
2021-03-01
Stroke
Abstract:Background and Objective: To report the results of clinical follow-up at 1 year among patients in the BASILAR registry. Design, Setting, and Participants: The BASILAR study was an investigator-initiated prospective registry, which consecutively enrolled stroke patients with acute basilar artery occlusion from 47 comprehensive stroke centers in China between January, 2014, and May, 2019. Patients were divided into conventional treatment or endovascular treatment groups according to the treatment their received. We assessed clinical outcomes 1 year after patients were enrolled in the BASILAR registry. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was the score on the modified Rankin scale (range, 0 to 6 points, with higher scores indicating more severe disability) at 1 year assessed as a common odds ratio using ordinal logistic regression shift analysis, adjusted for prespecified prognostic factors. Secondary outcomes included categories scores of the modified Rankin scale at 1 year (0 to 1 [excellent outcome], 0 to 2 [good outcome], and 0 to 3 [favorable outcome]), and death from any cause during the 1-year period after enrollment. Results: Of the 829 patients who were enrolled in the original study, 1-year data for this extended follow-up study were available for 785 patients (94.7%). The distribution of outcomes on the modified Rankin scale favored endovascular treatment over conventional treatment (adjusted common odds ratio, 4.50; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.81 to 7.29; P < 0.001). There were significant differences between the treatment groups in the percentage of patients who had excellent outcome, good outcome and favorable outcome. The cumulative 1-year mortality rate was 54.6% in the endovascular treatment group and 83.5% in the conventional treatment group (adjusted hazard ratio, 4.36; 95% CI, 2.69 to 7.29; P < 0.001). Conclusions and Relevance: In this extended follow-up study, the beneficial effect of endovascular treatment on functional outcome at 1 year in patients with acute basilar artery occlusion was similar to that reported at 90 days in the original study.
peripheral vascular disease,clinical neurology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?