Feasibility and efficacy of endoscopic purse-string suture-assisted closure for mucosal defects induced by endoscopic manipulations
Ming-Ming Li,Yi Zhang,Fang Sun,Man-Xiu Huai,Fei-Yu Zhang,Chun-Ying Qu,Feng Shen,Zheng-Hong Li,Lei-Ming Xu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v29.i4.731
IF: 5.374
2023-01-28
World Journal of Gastroenterology
Abstract:BACKGROUND: Large or transmural defects induced by gastrointestinal endoscopic manipulations are difficult to close, although complete closure is recommended for better recovery. Endoscopic purse-string assisted suturing (EPSS) has been used in clinical practice and has proven to be an effective and safe technique for the closure of large mucosal defects. However, details regarding the efficacy of endoscopic pre-purse-string suture (P-EPSS) are unknown, especially that it offers several advantages over conventional EPSS (C-EPSS).AIM: To elucidate the outcomes of EPSS-assisted closure in different clinical situations, and evaluate the efficacy of P-EPSS.METHODS: This retrospective observational study included a total of 180 patients who underwent closure assisted by P-EPSS (<i>n</i> = 63) or C-EPSS (<i>n</i> = 117) between July 2014 and June 2020. The P-EPSS and C-EPSS groups were compared and the intergroup differences in aspects such as the lesion size, location, and mor-phology, incidence of complete closure, intraoperative perforation, and delayed adverse events were evaluated. Data on the features and clinical course of cases with adverse events were collected for further analysis.RESULTS: Patients with lesion size larger than 3 cm, lesions located at the fundus of stomach, or submucosal tumors originating from the deep mucosa were more likely to undergo P-EPSS-assisted closure. The P-EPSS group showed a sign-ificantly higher proportion of intraoperative perforation (56% <i>vs</i> 17%) and a much shorter procedure time (9.06 ± 6.14 min <i>vs</i> 14.84 ± 7.25 min). Among adverse events, the incidence of delayed perforation (5% <i>vs</i> 4%; <i>P</i> = 0.82) and delayed bleeding (3% <i>vs</i> 4%; <i>P</i> = 0.96) did not differ significantly between the groups. Multivariate analysis revealed that lesions with incomplete closure [odds ratio (OR) = 21.33; 95% confidence interval (CI): 5.45-83.45; <i>P</i> < 0.01] or size greater than 3 cm (OR = 3.14; 95%CI: 1.08-9.18; <i>P</i> = 0.039) showed a statistical tendency to result in an increase in delayed adverse events.CONCLUSION: The present study revealed that EPSS could achieve secure complete closure of mucosal defect. P-EPSS could shorten the procedure and yield complete closure of mucosal defects. Rather than closure-type selection, incomplete closure or lesion size larger than 3 cm were associated with worse outcomes.
gastroenterology & hepatology