Sociodemographic and psychosocial risk factors of railway suicide a mixed-methods study combining data of all suicide decedents in the Netherlands with data from a psychosocial autopsy study

Elias Balt,Saskia Mérelle,Arne Popma,Daan Creemers,Karlijn Heesen,Nikki van Eijk,Isa van den Brand,Renske Gilissen

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-024-18120-w

IF: 4.5

2024-02-26

BMC Public Health

Abstract:Abstract Background Railway suicide has profound implications for the victims and their family, and affects train drivers, railway personnel, emergency services and witnesses. To inform a multilevel prevention strategy, more knowledge is required about psychosocial and precipitating risk factors of railway suicide. Methods Data from Statistics Netherlands of all suicides between 2017 and 2021 ( n = 9.241) of whom 986 died by railway suicide and interview data from a psychosocial autopsy of railway suicide decedents ( n = 39) were integrated. We performed logistic regression analyses to identify sociodemographic predictors of railway suicide compared to other methods of suicide. The Constant Comparative Method was subsequently employed on interview data from the psychosocial autopsy to identify patterns in psychosocial risk factors for railway suicide. Results The strongest predictors of railway suicide compared to other suicide methods were young age ( 150.000 euros. Several subgroups emerged in the psychosocial autopsy interviews, which specifically reflect populations at risk of railway suicide. These subgroups were [1] young adult males with autism spectrum disorder who strived for more autonomy and an independent life, [2] young adult females with persistent suicidal thoughts and behaviours, [3] middle-aged males with a persistent mood disorder who lived with family and who faced stressors proximal to the suicide in personal and professional settings, [4] male out-of-the-blue suicides and [5] persons with psychotic symptoms and a rapid deterioration. Conclusions based on our findings we propose and discuss several recommendations to prevent railway suicide. We must continue to invest in a safe railway environment by training personnel and installing barriers. Additionally, we should adopt prevention strategies that align the needs of subgroups at increased risk, including young females who have attempted other methods of suicide and young males with autism spectrum disorder. Future research should determine the cost-effectiveness and feasibility of low-maintenance, automated interventions near crossings and psychiatric facilities.

public, environmental & occupational health

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The problem that this paper attempts to solve is the prevention of railway suicide. Specifically, the research aims to provide a basis for formulating multi - level prevention strategies by identifying the sociodemographic and psychosocial risk factors of railway suicide. The study emphasizes the importance of targeted prevention for the needs of specific high - risk groups such as young people, multi - member families or institutional residents.

### Research Background and Problems
Railway suicide not only has a profound impact on the victims and their families, but also affects train drivers, railway workers, emergency service personnel and witnesses. In order to develop effective multi - level prevention strategies, more knowledge about the psychosocial and precipitating risk factors of railway suicide is required. The current research attempts to fill this knowledge gap by combining Dutch national suicide data and psychosocial autopsy data to identify the risk factors of railway suicide and make prevention recommendations.

### Main Research Questions
1. **Identify the sociodemographic risk factors of railway suicide**: Analyze the data of all suicides in the Netherlands between 2017 and 2021 to determine which sociodemographic characteristics are related to railway suicide.
2. **Identify the psychosocial risk factors of railway suicide**: Analyze the psychosocial autopsy data of 39 railway suicides to understand the mental state and social environment of these suicides before suicide.

### Methods
- **Data Sources**: Combine the data of the Dutch Central Bureau of Statistics (9,241 all suicides from 2017 - 2021) and the psychosocial autopsy data of 39 railway suicides.
- **Statistical Analysis**: Use logistic regression analysis to identify sociodemographic predictors, and use the Constant Comparative Method to analyze psychosocial autopsy data to identify psychosocial risk patterns.

### Results
- **Sociodemographic Risk Factors**:
- Young age (<30 years old)
- Native Dutch
- High education level
- Multi - member family (especially living with parents or in an institution)
- Rural area residence
- Annual household income over 150,000 euros

- **Psychosocial Risk Patterns**:
- **Young adult male with autism spectrum disorder**: The desire to pursue more autonomy and independent living.
- **Young adult female**: Persistent suicidal thoughts and behaviors.
- **Middle - aged male**: Persistent mood disorders, living with family, facing stress in personal and professional environments.
- **Sudden suicide**: Men suddenly decide to commit suicide without obvious warning signs.
- **Patients with mental symptoms**: Rapid deterioration of mental symptoms.

### Conclusions
Based on the research results, the author proposes a number of suggestions for preventing railway suicide, including continuing to invest in a safe railway environment (such as training personnel and installing guardrails), and formulating prevention strategies for the needs of specific high - risk groups. Future research should evaluate the cost - effectiveness and feasibility of low - maintenance automated interventions, especially in railway intersections and near psychiatric hospitals.

### Formula Example
In logistic regression analysis, the model can be expressed as:

\[ \text{logit}(P(Y = 1))=\beta_0+\beta_1 X_1+\beta_2 X_2+\cdots+\beta_p X_p \]

where \( P(Y = 1) \) represents the probability of railway suicide, \( X_1, X_2, \ldots, X_p \) are various predictor variables, and \( \beta_0, \beta_1, \ldots, \beta_p \) are the corresponding regression coefficients.