Disruptive behaviors in the classroom, a question of gender or of inadequate forms of coping?

Guil, Rocío,Holgado-Herrero, Magdalena,Gil-Olarte, Paloma,González-Fernández, Silvia,Gómez-Molinero, Rocío
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-024-06190-3
IF: 2.8
2024-06-08
Current Psychology
Abstract:Disruptive behaviors in the classroom are a cause of concern for schools and educational researchers because of their impact on the rhythm of the class, harming students and teachers. The literature links the use of different coping strategies with disruptive behavior, with controversy regarding the frequency in which boys and girls engage in them, as well as a differential use of problem-focused versus emotion-focused strategies within the sexes. This study aimed to explore the relationships between gender, coping strategies, and adolescent disruptive behaviors and to identify possible idiosyncratic profiles of students regarding gender and the typology of disruptive behaviors. A sample of 382 high school students from the city of Algeciras (Cádiz, Spain) completed the Hormigo et al. (2003) Questionnaire of Perception of Conflict Behaviors and the Spanish adaptation of the Cano et al. (2007) Coping Strategies Inventory. The results showed that problem-focused coping strategies predicted a lower frequency of disruptive behaviors, whereas emotion-focused coping strategies increased the frequency of disruptive behaviors regardless of gender. Three differentiated profiles of students have also been identified: two groups of boys (adolescents who frequently committed all types of disruptive behaviors and boys who engage less frequently in disruptive behaviors) and a group of girls, more homogeneous, who resemble the group of disruptive boys showing more aggression towards teachers and school material and slightly disobedient, and differing from both boys groups regarding aggression among students.
psychology, multidisciplinary
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
This paper discusses the issue of disruptive behaviors (DB) in schools, particularly in relation to gender and coping strategies (CS). Research has indicated that many teenagers worldwide have experienced violent incidents in schools, which have negatively impacted their learning and mental well-being. In Spain, there have been reports of an increase in bullying incidents among students and the time teachers spend maintaining classroom order. The objective of this paper is to explore the relationship between gender, coping strategies, and disruptive behaviors among adolescents, and to identify potential individual profiles, especially based on gender and different types of disruptive behaviors. The study used data from 382 Spanish high school students and found that problem-focused coping strategies predict lower frequency of disruptive behaviors, while emotion-focused strategies increase the occurrence of such behaviors, regardless of gender. The study also identified three different groups of students: a group of boys who frequently engage in various disruptive behaviors, a group of boys who engage in fewer disruptive behaviors, and a group of girls whose behavior pattern is more similar to the former group of boys, although girls exhibit more aggression towards teachers and materials and mild disobedience. The results of the study suggest that gender and coping strategies directly or indirectly explain and predict adolescent disruptive behaviors, but no significant mediating effects were found. Furthermore, the study identified three distinct patterns of student behavior, highlighting the importance of analyzing within-gender behavioral differences to avoid misunderstandings. Overall, this paper aims to provide scientific evidence for reducing school violence and improving educational quality, emphasizing the importance of coping strategy education to promote students' adaptability and positive social interaction.