Abstract:This study focuses on incidents of non-refund of Chunsei deposits occurring in multi-family and row houses valued at less than 300 million won. It empirically analyzes the economic variables affecting the number of refunds of Chunsei deposit insurance claims for tenants of small-scale housing using the Vector Error Correction Model. The dependent variable is the number of refunds of Chunsei deposit insurance claims, and the independent variables include corporate bond interest rates, the Chunsei price index, construction permit performance, and index of industrial product. The analysis results indicate that corporate bond interest rates have a significantly positive impact on the number of return cases of Chunsei deposit insurance claims, while construction permit performance, the Chunsei price index, and the industrial production index have a negative impact on these return cases. Among the independent variables, corporate bond interest rates have the largest positive impact on the dependent variable, which is the number of return cases of Chunsei deposit insurance claims. The Chunsei price index shows a sharp decline up to the third period, followed by repeated rises and falls. Both the Chunsei price index and construction permit performance are related to the real estate, while the industrial production index is closely related to the national economy. Therefore, the boom and bust cycles of the economy have a significant impact, with the number of Chunsei accidents decreasing during economic booms and increasing during recessions, resulting in a negative directional trend. The implications of this study suggest that to ensure housing stability for low-income households, there is a need for a stable supply of small-scale multi-family housing and the activation of a financially robust private rental market. The government's role in this is to maintain continuous and thorough monitoring to ensure the housing stability of small-scale housing for low-income residents.

The relationship between housing finance and inequality

Difference in Housing Finance Usage and Its Impact on Housing Wealth Inequality in Urban China

Housing Price, Consumption, and Financial Market: Evidence from Urban Household Data in China

Balancing the scales: How housing supply regulation shapes household wealth inequality in China

Envy and Pride: How Economic Inequality Deepens Happiness Inequality in South Korea

Impacts of demand and supply-side interventions on South Korea's housing markets: a dynamic housing-CGE analysis

Financial Sector Policies and Income Inequality

Predicting the longitudinal patterns of housing affordability stress: Evidence from the Korea Welfare Panel Study

The Time-Varying Effect of Interest Rates on Housing Prices

Boost, Control, or Both of Korean Housing Market: 831 Countermeasures

An Empirical Analysis of the Determinants of Household Debt in Korea

The effects of spatially targeted housing policy: Evidence from land transaction permit system in South Korea

A Theory of Financial Inclusion and Income Inequality

Finance And Inequality: Evidence From China

Analyzing the Factors Affecting Chunsei Deposit Issues in Small House

The Mathematical Simulation of South Korea's Financial and Economic Impacts from Real Estate Bubbles: Lessons from the China Evergrande Collapse

The Housing Supply Approach Based on the Concept of Financing and Saving：A Study on the Operation Mechanism of “Chonsei” Housing Rental System in South Korea

Spatial Disparity and Residential Assessment of Housing Cost-Burdened Renters

Household loan portfolios and financial characteristics of Korean banks

What Drove Housing Wealth Inequality in China?

The Effect of Real Estate Regulation Policy on Stabilizing Prices