Abstract:Background: Understanding the complex relationships among multiple strategies for gathering users' perspectives in the evaluation of the performance of services is crucial for the interpretation of user-reported measures. Objective: The main objectives were to (1) evaluate the psychometric performance of an 11-item web-based questionnaire of ratings of general practitioners (GPs) currently used in Norway (Legelisten.no) and (2) assess the association between web-based and survey-based patient experience indicators. Methods: We included all published ratings on GPs and practices on Legelisten.no in the period of May 5, 2012, to December 15, 2021 (N=76,521). The questionnaire consists of 1 mandatory item and 10 voluntary items with 5 response categories (1 to 5 stars), alongside an open-ended review question and background variables. Questionnaire dimensionality and internal consistency were assessed with Cronbach α, exploratory factor, and item response theory analyses, and a priori hypotheses were developed for assessing construct validity (chi-square analysis). We calculated Spearman correlations between web-based ratings and reference patient experience indicators based on survey data using the patient experiences with the GP questionnaire (n=5623 respondents for a random sample of 50 GPs). Results: Web-based raters were predominantly women (n=32,074, 64.0%), in the age range of 20-50 years (n=35,113, 74.6%), and reporting 5 or fewer consultations with the GP each year (n=28,798, 64.5%). Ratings were missing for 18.9% (n=14,500) to 27.4% (n=20,960) of nonmandatory items. A total of 4 of 11 rating items showed a U-shaped distribution, with >60% reporting 5 stars. Factor analysis and internal consistency testing identified 2 rating scales: "GP" (5 items; α=.98) and "practice" (6 items; α=.85). Some associations were not consistent with a priori hypotheses and allowed only partial confirmation of the construct validity of ratings. Item response theory analysis results were adequate for the "practice" scale but not for the "GP" scale, with items with inflated discrimination (>5) distributed over a narrow interval of the scale. The correlations between the web-based ratings GP scale and GP reference indicators ranged from 0.34 (P=.021) to 0.44 (P=.002), while the correlation between the web-based ratings practice scale and reference indicators ranged from 0.17 (not significant) to 0.49 (P<.001). The strongest correlations between web-based and survey scores were found for items measuring practice-related experiences: phone availability (ρ=0.51), waiting time in the office (ρ=0.62), other staff (ρ=0.54-0.58; P<.001). Conclusions: The practice scale of the web-based ratings has adequate psychometric performance, while the GP suffers from important limitations. The associations with survey-based patient experience indicators were accordingly mostly weak to modest. Our study underlines the importance of interpreting web-based ratings with caution and the need to further develop rating sites.

Factors associated with patients' experience of accessibility to general practice: results from a national survey in Norway

Multimorbidity and patient experience with general practice: A national cross-sectional survey in Norway

Web-Based Public Ratings of General Practitioners in Norway: Validation Study

Older patients' experiences of access to and use of e-consultations with the general practitioner in Norway: an interview study

Patients' Experiences of Accessing Their Electronic Health Records: National Patient Survey in Sweden

Patient enablement after a consultation with a general practitioner-Explaining variation between countries, practices and patients

Food insecurity in Norway: A cross-sectional study among patients visiting their general practitioner

International survey of people living with chronic conditions (PaRIS survey): effects of general practitioner non-participation on the representativeness of the Norwegian patient data

Car travel time and accessibility by bus to general practitioner services: a study using patient registers and GIS

Factors associated with patients' experience of access to their multidisciplinary primary health care clinic: A multilevel analysis

Examining health literacy in the Danish general population: a cross-sectional study on the associations between individual factors and healthcare-seeking behaviour

Experiences and opinions of general practitioners with patient online record access: an online survey in England

General Practitioners’ Experiences of Clinical Consultations With Refugees Suffering From Mental Health Problems

Individual Patient Factors Associated with the Use of Physical or Digital Primary Care in Sweden

The impact of clinical experience on working tasks and job-related stress: a survey among 1032 Norwegian GPs

Associations between health literacy proficiencies and health-related quality of life and GP visits among young people in Norway: a population-based cross-sectional study

Knowledge, attitudes, behavior, and self-efficacy related to evidence-based practice among healthcare professionals working in the municipal healthcare service in Norway: a cross-sectional survey

Does shortage of GPs matter? A cross-sectional study of practice population life expectancy

General practitioners’ perceptions towards the use of digital health services for citizens in primary care: a qualitative interview study

Continuity of care in general practice in Norway

Widening access to medicine may improve general practitioner recruitment in deprived and rural communities: survey of GP origins and current place of work