Abstract:Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) have been extensively used in the field of tissue engineering and regenerative medicine. The effect of surface properties on the differentiation of MSCs is a very important issue for the design and fabrication of scaffolds or biomaterials. This review is mainly focused on the morphological or topographic characteristics of cell adhesion substrate, i.e. cell area and shape for individual cell, cell density and cell–cell contact for multiple cells, substrate roughness, ridge width, micropillar height, nanoparticle diameter and aspect ratio of nanowire. The results from different studies were quantitatively analyzed using comparable or unified parameters and definitions under the specific experimental conditions such as cell source, culture time, induction medium, matrix material and differentiation marker. Some interesting phenomena and properties were discovered by this integrated and systematic analysis, which might give insights into the regulatory mechanism of surface morphology or topography on MSCs differentiation.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem this paper attempts to address is the exploration of how substrate surface topography (including cell adhesion areas, shape, density, cell-cell contact, substrate roughness, ridge-groove width, micropillar height, nanoparticle diameter, and nanowire aspect ratio, etc.) affects the differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs). Specifically, the authors aim to quantitatively analyze the relationship between these topographical parameters and MSC differentiation by comprehensively reviewing studies from the past 20 years, in order to gain a deeper understanding of how surface topography or topology regulates MSC differentiation.
### Main Content
1. **Adhesion Morphology of Individual MSCs**:
- **Cell Shape**: Studies have found that the spreading area and shape of cells significantly influence their differentiation direction. For example, a larger spreading area promotes osteogenic differentiation while inhibiting adipogenic differentiation.
- **Aspect Ratio**: The aspect ratio of cells has different effects on osteogenic and adipogenic differentiation. A higher aspect ratio may inhibit osteogenic differentiation but promote adipogenic differentiation.
- **Roundness**: Higher roundness promotes adipogenic differentiation, while lower roundness promotes osteogenic differentiation.
2. **Cell-Cell Connections**:
- **Cell Density**: Increasing cell density reduces osteogenic differentiation but enhances adipogenic differentiation. This may be because higher density increases cell-cell contact, leading to a reduction in cell spreading area.
- **Cell-Cell Contact**: Increasing cell-cell contact can promote both osteogenic and adipogenic differentiation, possibly by forming more gap junctions that allow direct transmission of signaling molecules and metabolites.
3. **Effect of Substrate Surface Topography on MSC Differentiation**:
- **Roughness**: The roughness of the substrate surface within a certain range (e.g., 120 to 1000 nanometers) can promote osteogenic differentiation, but when it exceeds 1 micron, it inhibits osteogenic differentiation.
- **Ridge-Groove Structure**: The width of the ridge-groove structure has a significant impact on MSC differentiation. Smaller ridge-groove widths (e.g., 0.2 microns) are more suitable for osteogenic differentiation.
- **Micropillars**: Higher micropillar heights (e.g., 4.6 or 6.4 microns) promote osteogenic differentiation, while lower heights (e.g., 0.8 microns) promote adipogenic differentiation.
- **Nanoparticles**: The size of nanoparticles significantly affects MSC differentiation. Smaller nanoparticles (e.g., 40 nanometers) promote osteogenic differentiation, while larger nanoparticles (e.g., 400 nanometers) inhibit osteogenic differentiation.
- **Nanowires**: Smaller aspect ratios (e.g., 54) or smaller diameters of nanowires (e.g., 15 nanometers) can guide MSCs towards osteogenic differentiation.
### Conclusion
Through a comprehensive analysis of numerous studies, this paper reveals the significant regulatory role of substrate surface topography on MSC differentiation and provides a theoretical basis for the design and preparation of scaffold materials for tissue engineering and regenerative medicine. These findings help to deepen the understanding of the mechanisms of cell-substrate surface interactions, thereby optimizing cell culture conditions and improving the application outcomes in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine.