Abstract:Background: Medical coding is the process that converts clinical documentation into standard medical codes. Codes are used for several key purposes in a hospital (eg, insurance reimbursement and performance analysis); therefore, their optimization is crucial. With the rapid growth of natural language processing technologies, several solutions based on artificial intelligence have been proposed to aid in medical coding by automatically suggesting relevant codes for clinical documents. However, their effectiveness is still limited to simple cases, and it is not yet clear how much value they can bring in improving coding efficiency and accuracy. Objective: This study aimed to bring more efficiency to the coding process to improve the selection of codes by medical coders. To achieve this, we developed an innovative multimodal machine learning–based solution that, instead of predicting codes, detects the degree of coding complexity before coding is performed. The notion of coding complexity was used to better dispatch work among medical coders to eventually minimize errors and improve throughput. Methods: To train and evaluate our approach, we collected 2060 cases rated by coders in terms of coding complexity from 1 (simplest) to 4 (most complex). We asked 2 expert coders to rate 3.01% (62/2060) of the cases as the gold standard. The agreements between experts were used as benchmarks for model evaluation. A case contains both clinical text and patient metadata from the hospital electronic health record. We extracted both text features and metadata features, then concatenated and fed them into several machine learning models. Finally, we selected 2 models. The first used cross-validated training on 1751 cases and testing on 309 cases aiming to assess the predictive power of the proposed approach and its generalizability. The second model was trained on 1998 cases and tested on the gold standard to validate the best model performance against human benchmarks. Results: Our first model achieved a macro– F 1 -score of 0.51 and an accuracy of 0.59 on classifying the 4-scale complexity. The model distinguished well between the simple (combined complexity 1-2) and complex (combined complexity 3-4) cases with a macro– F 1 -score of 0.65 and an accuracy of 0.71. Our second model achieved 61% agreement with experts' ratings and a macro– F 1 -score of 0.62 on the gold standard, whereas the 2 experts had a 66% (41/62) agreement ratio with a macro– F 1 -score of 0.67. Conclusions: We propose a multimodal machine learning approach that leverages information from both clinical text and patient metadata to predict the complexity of coding a case in the precoding phase. By integrating this model into the hospital coding system, distribution of cases among coders can be done automatically with performance comparable with that of human expert coders, thus improving coding efficiency and accuracy at scale.

Artificial Intelligence to Predict Billing Code Levels of Emergency Department Encounters

Can a Novel Natural Language Processing Model and Artificial Intelligence Automatically Generate Billing Codes From Spine Surgical Operative Notes?

How artificial intelligence could transform emergency care

Prediction of patient flow in the emergency department using explainable artificial intelligence

Assessing Retrieval-Augmented Large Language Model Performance in Emergency Department ICD-10-CM Coding Compared to Human Coders

Identifying low acuity Emergency Department visits with a machine learning approach: The low acuity visit algorithms (LAVA)

Evaluating the Reliability of a Remote Acuity Prediction Tool in a Canadian Academic Emergency Department

Automating the overburdened clinical coding system: challenges and next steps

Artificial intelligence algorithm to predict the need for critical care in prehospital emergency medical services

Artificial Intelligence Algorithm with ICD Coding Technology Guided by the Embedded Electronic Medical Record System in Medical Record Information Management

Current Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Billing Practices and Clinical Plastic Surgery

Natural language processing of MIMIC-III clinical notes for identifying diagnosis and procedures with neural networks

Early prediction of diagnostic-related groups and estimation of hospital cost by processing clinical notes

Can Publicly Available Artificial Intelligence Successfully Identify Current Procedural Terminology Codes for Common Procedures in Neurosurgery?

Exploring Artificial Intelligence (AI) Technologies in Predictive Medicine: A Systematic Review

Experimentation of AI Models Towards the Prediction of Medium-Risk Emergency Department Cases Disposition Outcome

An End-to-End Natural Language Processing Application for Prediction of Medical Case Coding Complexity: Algorithm Development and Validation

Multi-label natural language processing to identify diagnosis and procedure codes from MIMIC-III inpatient notes

AI in the ED: Assessing the efficacy of GPT models vs. physicians in medical score calculation

Intelligent EHRs: Predicting Procedure Codes From Diagnosis Codes

Abstract 350: Measuring the Return on Investment of an Artificial Intelligence (AI) Early Warning System