Abstract:IntroductionTo date there has been no acceptable and accurate diagnostic criteria or standard of care for the management of sacroiliac joint (SIJ) pain. Several studies have yielded different contribution of clinical presentation, history and physical examination in the diagnosis of SIJ pain. Our goal in this study is to assess the sensitivity and specificity of the diagnostic clinical tests and their predictive value in accurately diagnosing SIJ pain. MethodologyUpon enrolling 200 eligible patients with SIJ pain as their primary diagnosis, they were re‐evaluated and their verbal rating scale (VRS) pain score and demographic data were obtained. Thereafter, three SIJ diagnostic tests were performed: "thigh thrust test", "Patrick test" and a modified version of Gaenslen test which is referred to as "Mekhail test". Subsequently, the patients were taken to the procedure room to have SIJ injection performed, for which a confirmative result was ≥50% pain relief. The physicians performing the procedure were blinded of the results of the 3 tests performed. Results from the 3 tests were incorporated with the procedure results from which we drew statistical and medical conclusions determining their predictive value and degree of aid to physicians in diagnosing SIJ Pain. ResultsWe found the cumulative effect of adding simultaneous tests increased sensitivity of the testing, but decreased specificity, which generates a powerful screening tool. The combination of Partick's and Mekhail's tests demonstrated best accuracy with 94% sensitivity, 17% specificity, 81 % PPV and 44% NPV. Patrick's test was better than other tests in discrimination SIJ from non‐SIJ patients. No combination yielded both significant sensitivity and specificity. Generally, the overall predictive value of any of the tests on their own or their combination did not vary significantly from the predictive value of baseline demographics including pre‐injection pain score and pain referral diagram ConclusionIn conclusion, our study results were similar to the publications of various authors, whom found that physical examination plays a limited role in diagnosing SIJ pain. Specifically, we found that the clinical tests and/or their combinations added no significant predictive capacity compared to patients baseline characteristics in predicting the response to diagnostic sacroiliac joint injection, albeit the combinations of Mekhail's and Patrick's test yielded high sensitivity (94%), making them viable for screening, consecutively possibly reducing unnecessary costs diagnostic SIJ injection procedures.

The value of a repeat MRI examination of the sacroiliac joints following an inconclusive initial examination

Common incidental findings on sacroiliac joint MRI: added value of MRI-based synthetic CT

Spondyloarthropathy - Is sacroiliac joint imaging sufficient? A study of 431 patients

The annual rate of sacroiliitis and disease detection using magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography, and X-ray: A single-center experience

Role of MRI in Diagnosis of Sacro-iliac Joint Lesions

Magnetic Resonance Imaging Compared to Conventional Radiographs for Detection of Chronic Structural Changes in Sacroiliac Joints in Axial Spondyloarthritis

The Diagnostic Value of Clinical Sacroiliac Joint Pain Provocation Tests for Detection of Sacroiliitis Identified by MRI in Sampled Iraqi Patients with Inflammatory Back Pain

Value of dedicated small-field-of-view sacroiliac versus large-field-of-view pelvic magnetic resonance imaging for evaluating pediatric sacroiliitis

Variability in Interpretation of Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Pediatric Sacroiliac Joint

Addition of CT to Improve the Diagnostic Confidence for the Detection of Sacroiliac Joint Erosions in Patients with Equivocal MRI Findings

Does evaluation of the ligamentous compartment enhance diagnostic utility of sacroiliac joint MRI in axial spondyloarthritis?

Diagnosis of Sacroiliac Joint Pain: Predictive Value of Three Diagnostic Clinical Tests

Role of advanced MRI techniques for sacroiliitis assessment and quantification

Comparison between STIR and T2-weighted SPAIR sequences in the evaluation of inflammatory sacroiliitis: diagnostic performance and signal-to-noise ratio

Development and Preliminary Validation of the Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada Magnetic Resonance Imaging Sacroiliac Joint Structural Score

Feasibility of T2 Mapping of the Sacroiliac Joints in Healthy Control Subjects and Children and Young Adults with Sacroiliitis

Comparison of MRI with radiography for detecting structural lesions of the sacroiliac joint using CT as standard of reference: results from the SIMACT study

Comparison of established and preliminarily proposed ASAS MRI working group cut-offs for inflammatory MRI lesions in the sacroiliac joints in radiographic and non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis

Are we overcalling sacroiliitis on MRI? Differential diagnosis that every rheumatologist should know - Part I

Presence of axial spondyloarthritis associated sacroiliitis and structural changes on MR enterography: A direct comparison with sacroiliac joint MRI

CT-like images of the sacroiliac joint generated from MRI using susceptibility-weighted imaging (SWI) in patients with axial spondyloarthritis