Challenges of Modern Public Administration and Ethical Decision-Making

Drahomíra Ondrová

DOI: https://doi.org/10.4467/24497800rap.17.015.7066

2017-01-01

Rocznik Administracji Publicznej

Abstract:Challenges of Modern Public Administration and Ethical Decision-Making

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Public Administration Ethics in the Czech Republic

Marie Bohata,Anna Putnova,Martina Rasticova,Pavel Seknicka,Monika Szurmanova,Andrea Cebakova

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5771/0949-6181-2022-2-210

2022-01-01

Journal of East European Management Studies

Abstract:This article introduces the results of the first survey of Czech civil servants specifically targeting the domain of public ethics. The survey serves a double purpose: to provide data relevant for the development of a tailor-made ethics training programme for public officials, and to answer two research questions: (1) What are the main factors influencing the core values in Czech public administration? (2) Does the existence of ethics resources contribute to an improved ethical climate in the Czech public administration as perceived by public officials? The findings show that an ethical code is the most widespread, but often the only, ethics instrument implemented in Czech public administration and that the code is not used effectively. The results also confirm a positive but weak influence of the number of ethics resources on the perception of the existence of ethical problems, and a slight direct correlation between a higher number of resources and the perception of positive ethics development in the workplace. No support is found for the assertion that the more ethics resources are used by the organisation, the greater is the importance of the organisational culture for decision-making. This empirical research illustrates that - unlike in other countries of the former Eastern Bloc - ethics has been a low-priority agenda in Czech public administration and that enhancing ethical standards, and thus increasing citizens’ trust in public services, will be a long-term process. Leadership and leading by example, alongside ethics education and training, are the avenues to pursue.

management
Leadership in public administration: today's challenges

I. Shorobura,O. Dolynska

DOI: https://doi.org/10.12775/jehs.2023.13.02.043

2023-02-24

Abstract:The participation of the public in the formation and implementation of the state policy of promoting the development of civil society by the executive authorities is ensured. The issue of leadership in public administration is extremely relevant today. Leadership is the object of research by many scientists, three main theoretical approaches to understanding leadership (charismatic action, situational theory, synthetic theory) have been formulated. Leadership is a type of activity that permeates the entire management system. It is impossible to effectively perform the functions of planning, organization, motivation and control if there is no effective management and leaders. The manager’s personality is formed gradually. In psychology, various approaches to the development of theoretical models of personality development and the effectiveness of managerial activities of managers have been developed (collective approach, competitive, partial, engineering-psychological approach, reflective value approach, social-psychological, situational-complex approach, factor approach, functional approach, image approach, integrative). Seven skills and character traits of a manager valuable to companies are highlighted: leadership skills, strategic thinking, technical and technological skills, the ability to build relationships and create a team, the ability to present oneself and communicate, change management, honesty. The practice of training and retraining of managers includes active learning methods. The problem of the manager's culture in management philosophy is gaining importance. The main scientific disciplines are highlighted. Today, there are a significant number of grand programs for leaders of public administration that contribute to the development of leadership qualities. Self-management is the ability to manage oneself, one's potential, abilities, and knowledge. The working hours of the majority are condensed. The only solution can be the use of special techniques and methods, which have the general name of time management. There are many methods for solving problems related to the rational use of working time. The main principles of time management are highlighted.

English Else
Citizen Participation in Public Administration

Veronika Linhartova

DOI: https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-4978-0.ch005

2021-01-01

Abstract:The aim of the chapter is to evaluate the citizens involvement in contemporary public administration, especially in the Czech Republic. New concepts of governance and management of public sector organizations enable providing new or improved public goods and services that better meet consumer ́s needs. These concepts also represent reformed or new approaches to governance with increased citizen participation. Public administration responds to dynamic changes in information and communication technologies and their maturity and uses them in the framework of e-government. Thanks to the implementation of e-government, citizens have become more knowledgeable, able to participate in decision-making processes, thus automatically becoming co-producers of public goods or services. This approach to public good and service delivery describes modern public sector management theories as co-creation. Although co-creation is an entirely new concept in some countries, various forms of public participation are becoming increasingly important worldwide and can be expected to continue in the future.
Ethics of Digital Innovation in Public Administration

Olena Pakhnenko,Zhang Kuan

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21272/bel.7(1).113-121.2023

2023-01-01

Business Ethics and Leadership

Abstract:In public administration, digital technologies are considered a necessary direction of technical modernisation, improving the work of government agencies and the quality of their interaction with stakeholders. However, along with the benefits, several ethical concerns exist about using digital technologies. The purpose of the article is to analyse the state of the implementation of digital innovations in the field of public administration, as well as to systemise and analyse the main groups of ethical concerns arising in connection with the use of digital technologies in public administration. The article uses methods of bibliometric, comparative, and statistical analysis. The Google trends toolkit was used to study global trends in interest in e-governance, e-government, digital government, and related terms. Digital government and e-government were identified as the most common terms to define the use of digital technologies in public administration. The bibliographic analysis was carried out using VOSviewer v.1.6.18 based on Scopus articles for 2001-2022 and made it possible to identify four clusters of scientific research on e-government / digital government and ethics. The analysis used the criterion of at least five times the co-occurrence of all keywords in publications. Based on data from the World Bank, an analysis of the level of maturity of government technologies in European countries, particularly Ukraine, was carried out. The analysis showed that most countries had reached a very high level of e-government development in the European region. In recent years, Ukraine has significantly increased the indicators of the level of e-government, especially regarding the provision of digital administrative services. The article systematises the main ethical issues of using digital technologies in public administration. Three ethical problems were formed, namely 1) privacy, security, and data protection; 2) transparency and accountability; 3) inclusion, accessibility, and non-discrimination. The third group is defined as the most relevant at the current moment. The growing digital divide in the world necessitates the search for effective mechanisms to increase digital inclusion and ensure equal access to e-government for all stakeholders. The results of the research can be useful for scientists, state, and local self-government bodies in managing their technological and digital modernisation.
Methods and models of administrative decision-making in the socio-cultural sphere: analysis and perspectives

Valentyn Nekhai

DOI: https://doi.org/10.37131/2524-0943-2024-52-13

2024-07-11

Bulletin of Lviv National Academy of Arts

Abstract:General problems of decision-making in various spheres of activity require a systematic approach and consideration of many factors. This process is multistep and complex, as each decision can have a significant impact on the internal and external environment. Analytical thinking is a key component of successful decision-making. It includes the ability to recognize the main aspects of a problem, systematically analyze available information, and consider different options for action and their potential consequences. The development of analytical thinking helps managers and specialists make informed decisions based on logical and critical data analysis. Modern methods and decision-making models, such as economic-mathematical models, game theory, system analysis and heuristic approaches, allow you to objectively evaluate possible solutions to the problem. These techniques can help identify optimal strategies given limited resources and existing risks. The use of these tools allows you to reduce subjective influences on the decision-making process and increase its efficiency. The integration of different approaches is important to achieve a comprehensive understanding of the problem and develop comprehensive solutions. Successful decision-making requires not only deep knowledge and skills, but also the ability to work in conditions of uncertainty and complexity. It is important to consider both internal and external factors that can affect the result. A comprehensive approach to decision-making allows you to effectively manage these challenges and ensure the sustainable development of organizations and society as a whole. The article is devoted to the analysis of methods and models of managerial decision-making in the socio-cultural sphere. The study focuses on the importance of considering cultural and social factors in the decision-making process. The work examines various approaches to management, in particular methods of involving the public, ethical aspects, as well as the use of heuristic models. The purpose of the study is to determine effective approaches to management decision-making that take into account the specifics of the socio-cultural environment. The methodology includes the dialectical method, generalization, synthesis, and logical and systemic analysis. In the course of the research, the challenges and possibilities of applying various methods in the practice of managing socio-cultural processes were revealed. Special attention is paid to the analysis of potential obstacles, such as cultural, ethnic, religious, and social differences, and the difficulty of measuring the impact of these factors. The results of the study indicate the importance of the integration of the latest technologies as well as the development of adaptive methodologies for effective management in various socio-cultural conditions. Recommendations include the need for a multidisciplinary approach and collaboration between academics and practitioners to achieve positive results. Thus, the article contributes to the understanding of decision-making processes in the sociocultural environment, emphasizing the importance of a comprehensive and adaptive approach.
Handbook of Public Administration

DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429270680

2021-04-02

Abstract:Public administration as a field of study finds itself in the middle of a fluid environment. The very reach and complexity of public administration has been easy to take for granted, easy to attack, and difficult to explain, particularly in the soundbite and Twitter-snipe media environment. Not only has the context for the discipline changed, but the institutions of public administration have adapted and innovated to deliver services to the public and serve those in power while becoming increasingly complex themselves. Has public administration evolved? And what new lines of research are critical for effective policy and delivery of programs and public services while preserving foundational principles such as the rule of law and expert institutions? This Handbook of Public Administration sheds light for new researchers, doctoral students, scholars, and practitioners interested in probing modern public administration’s role in solving major challenges facing nations and the world. This fourth edition recognizes that the scholarship of public administration must reflect the diverse influence of an international orientation, embracing public administration issues and practices in governance systems around the world, and illustrating just how practice can vary across jurisdictions. Every section identifies foundational principles and issues, shows variation in practice across selected jurisdictions, and identifies promising avenues for research. Each chapter revisits enduring themes and tensions, showing how they persist, along with new challenges and opportunities presented by digital technology and contemporary political realities. The Handbook of Public Administration, Fourth Edition provides a compelling introduction to and depiction of the contemporary realities of public administration, and it will inspire new avenues of inquiry for the next generation of public administration researchers.
A Conflict Resolution Approach to Public Administration

ZY Lan

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/976689

IF: 8.144

1997-01-01

Public Administration Review

Abstract:Public administrators often have to deal with conflicts. However, many public administrators have not been adequately exposed to the skills and rationales of conflict resolution. Ample literature about conflict exists in sister disciplines such as sociology, international relations, and labor relations. These studies focus on the impact of conflict, the nature of conflict, the players in the conflict, and possible strategies for conflict resolution. These studies can help public administrators better understand the nature of their work as well as their roles as conflict resolvers, conflict observers, or parties to conflict. The field of public administration could benefit greatly by incorporating the conflict resolution perspective into its teaching and research. Public administration literature has dealt extensively with how to execute the will of the people effectively and efficiently (Wilson, 1992; Gulick and Urwick, 1937; Brownlow, Merriam, and Gulick, 1937); how to deliver public services entrepreneurially and innovatively (Savas, 1987; Osborne and Gaebler, 1992); and how to be accountable and responsive to the public in general (Waldo, 1948; Ostrom, 1973; Goodsell, 1986; Rourke, 1992; Ingraham and Romzek, 1994). However, the field has had much less emphasis on conflict resolution, although sporadic studies have described the conflictual nature of public administrators' work or addressed microlevel (individual and organizational) conflict resolution in public organizations (Simon, 1957; Lipsky, 1980; Vizzard, 1995). The Civil Justice Reform Act of 1990 (28 U.S.C. sec. 471 et seq.), the Administrative Dispute Resolution Act of 1990 (Public Law 101-552), and the Negotiated Rulemaking Act of 1990 (Public Law 101-648) explicitly expressed support, outlined methods, or stated requirements for federal agencies and departments to implement alternative strategies to resolve their administrative disputes (Madigan, 1992; Susskind, Babbit, and Segal, 1993; Manring, 1994; Deavel, 1994).[1] These acts are Congressional responses to the incredible growth in costs of civil litigation and delays that contribute to those costs.[2] They send out a strong message that conflict resolution is an indispensable component of contemporary public administration and that it is time the field started paying serious attention to it. Indeed, moving into the 1990s, the conflicts public administrators confront are much more complex, multifaceted, and intense. Besides the typical interpersonal and interorganizational conflicts, such as personnel grievances, labor disputes, and organizational jurisdiction disputes, many institutional-level conflicts have also surfaced or intensified. Such conflicts include economic development versus environmental protection; rising public interest concerns versus the call for more dependence on private methods; decentralization of power versus the need for coordinating larger tasks of high technology development and global competition; increased social wealth versus the enduring problems of poverty and crime; shaken public confidence in government versus increased need for confidence in the nation's economy; uncompetitive compensation versus the requirement for high-quality public service personnel; organizational uncertainty versus increased reliance on employee loyalty to public service; high-level national debt versus increased pressure for public spending on social and environmental programs; postmodern democratic demands versus modern quests for efficiency and effectiveness; special interests versus the general public interest; national homogeneity versus cultural diversity claims; need for cooperation versus tensions among ethnic groups and between genders; nationalism versus internationalism; and promotion for free international markets versus new tariffs to protect domestic industries. The length of this list, which is by no means exhaustive, underscores the message that today's public administrators cannot manage well without adequate understanding of, and skills in, conflict resolution. …
Competing Values in Public Administration

Zeger van der Wal

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.013.1368

2020-01-01

Abstract:Public administration theory and practice are been rife with competing values, and 21st-century trends and challenges create new value dilemmas. Values—standards and qualities that guide behavior and decision making—can compete for attention because they may be of equal importance to the larger public interest that administrative actors are aiming to realize yet adhering to each of them at once is not feasible or possible. Examples are transparency, accountability, equity, effectiveness, efficiency, and legality. Hence, administrative actors have to find ways to manage competing values at an individual and institutional level.
Artificial Public Administration – Myth or Reality?

Richard Pomahač

DOI: https://doi.org/10.14712/23366478.2024.27

2024-05-23

AUC IURIDICA

Abstract:The computerization of public administration tasks is a reality. In contrast, the intelligence of public administration is shrouded in myths. For many decades, administrative science has contributed to the clarification of this distinction. Digital constitutionalism and technology-oriented administrative law doctrine have recently been added to this research. The basic regulations, proposed and adopted within individual states, in the European Union and in international organizations, whether it concerns the protection of personal data, cyber security, or artificial intelligence, do establish new tasks for public administration, but they affect methods rather than forms of administrative activity. Emerging technology raises concerns about the ability to understand artificial reasoning and its methods of classification, personalization, and prediction. It is questionable to assume that all actions can be quantified and thus everything becomes objective. Technology compounds the situation and has its own imperative.
Technology Ethics in Public Service: Envisioning the Role of the Techno-Ethicist

Daniel Baracskay

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10999922.2022.2031505

2022-03-11

Public Integrity

Abstract:In terms of technological progress, students of public administration confront a challenging dilemma where normative reflection in the realm of technology ethics has not kept pace with the rapidity and magnitude of technological advancement. Consequently, this necessitates further reflection on how to best apply aspects of ethical behavior to the development and usage of technology in the public sector. The significant role of the technology ethics in public service has received meager consideration in the literature, lacking a theoretical foundation that can help guide practitioners (as techno-ethicists) through rapid transitions in technological progress. Using the philosophy of technology literature, this article seeks to address this gap in public administration theory by considering first, how technological advancements affect the nature of didactic power relationships between the public and government; and second how the concept of technological nonneutrality is framed as a basis for structuring what obligations public administrators have when adopting and using technology in public service. This includes reflection upon the expanding role of newer technologies such as Artificial Intelligence in reshaping the nature of government-society relationships. Framing techno-ethical principles in theoretical dialogue prompts greater awareness for how practitioners may effectively respond as moral agents to rapidly changing technological advancements.
When Bureaucracy Meets the Crowd: Studying “Open Government” in the Vienna City Administration

Martin Kornberger,Renate E. Meyer,Christof Brandtner,Markus A. Höllerer

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840616655496

2017-01-12

Organization Studies

Abstract:Open Government is en vogue, yet vague: while practitioners, policy-makers, and others praise its virtues, little is known about how Open Government relates to bureaucratic organization. This paper presents insights from a qualitative investigation into the City of Vienna, Austria. It demonstrates how the encounter between the city administration and “the open” juxtaposes the decentralizing principles of the crowd, such as transparency, participation, and distributed cognition, with the centralizing principles of bureaucracy, such as secrecy, expert knowledge, written files, and rules. The paper explores how this theoretical conundrum is played out and how senior city managers perceive Open Government in relation to the bureaucratic nature of their administration. The purpose of this paper is twofold: first, to empirically trace the complexities of the encounter between bureaucracy and Open Government; and second, to critically theorize the ongoing rationalization of public administration in spite of constant challenges to its bureaucratic principles. In so doing, the paper advances our understanding of modern bureaucratic organizations under the condition of increased openness, transparency, and interaction with their environments.

management
Ethical codes for public administration – reflection of EU core values or part of national anti-corruption policy? Example of the Czech Republic and Ukraine

Olga Goncharuk,Maxim Tomoszek

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/eustu-2023-0016

2023-12-01

Abstract:Summary This article investigates, whether the adoption of ethical codes in the Czech Republic and in Ukraine mainly aim at implementation of EU ethical framework for public administration or should be viewed as a part of national anti-corruption policy. To that end, the article will analyse, whether the ethical codes for public administration in the Czech Republic and Ukraine reflect core principles of EU ethical framework for public administration, or rather contain specific provisions aimed at eliminating corruption. The practical effects of relevant provisions, their enforcement and contribution to elimination of corruption will also be analysed. Besides analysis and comparison of the situation in the Czech Republic and Ukraine, the article aims to identify common experiences and patterns to provide generalization useful for understanding the effect of ethical codes on elimination of corruption and national implementation of European core ethical principles for public administration in wider context of Central and Eastern European post-communist countries, which are still suffering from quite significant rates of corruption and examples of maladministration.
Ethics in Public Policy and Management

Alan Lawton,Zeger van der Wal,L.W.J.C. Huberts

DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315856865

2015-01-01

Abstract:Part I: Introduction 1. The Scope and Scale of Ethics in Public Policy and Management (Alan Lawton, Zeger van der Wal and Leo Huberts) Part II: Theorising the Practice(s) of Ethics 2. A Public Ethics of Care: Bringing ethics of care into public ethics research (Helena Olofsdotter Stensota) 3.Adding Colours to the Shades of Grey: Enriching the integrity discourse with virtue ethics concepts (Marcel Becker and Jitse Talsma) 4. Discourses of Deceit, Political Myth and Ideological Capital in Public Administration (Michael Macaulay) Part III: Understanding and Combating Corruption 5. History and Public Ethics (Toon Kerkhoff and Pieter Wagenaar) 6. Building Integrity in Public Sector Operations (Olivia Monaghan and Adam Graycar) 7. Theoretical (Mis)understanding? Applying Principal-Agent and Collective Action Theories to the Problem of Corruption in Systemically Corrupt Countries (Caryn Peiffer and Heather Marquette) 8. The Ethics of Public Officials in the United States: Strong, bent, broken? (Donald C. Menzel) Part IV: Managing Integrity 9. Institutionalizing Integrity Management: Challenges and solutions in times of financial crises and austerity measures (Alan Hoekstra) 10. Ethical Leadership Research: Looking beyond the leader (Leonie Heres) 11. The Limits of Rule Governance (Paul M Heywood and Jonathan Rose) 12. Researching and Improving the Effectiveness of Ethics Training (Jeroen Maesschalck and Annelies De Schrijver) Part V: Ethics Across Boundaries 13. Public Service Motivation in a Complex Public Sector (Alan Lawton and Julie Rayner) 14.What Does Working in the Public Services Mean? Describing the public service ethos in practice (Steven Parker) 15. Conflicts of Interest and Ethical Decision-Making: Mainland China and Hong Kong comparison (Ting Gong and Ian Scott) Part VI: Expanding Ethical Policy Domains 16. Ethical Decisions and the Great Moral Challenge of our Time (Ken Coghill) 17. The Undiscovered Country: Establishing an ethical paradigm for space activities in the 21st Century (Christopher J. Newman) Part VII: Conclusion 18. Towards a Global Ethics: Wishful thinking or a strategic necessity? (Alan Lawton, Zeger van der Wal and Leo Huberts)
Decision-Making Procedures and Their Relation to Knowledge Management and Quality Management

Ivan Litvaj,Olga Ponisciakova,Dana Stancekova,Jaroslava Svobodova,Jozef Mrazik

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su14010572

IF: 3.9

2022-01-05

Sustainability

Abstract:The environment in which managers currently operate is dynamic and turbulent. This fact affects the great complexity and dynamism of changes. Thus, decision-making becomes more complex in the context of sustainability. Decisive decision-making is becoming rare, and the challenge of globalization is increasing. Under its influence, decision-making is no longer deterministic. Decision-making processes prevail in conditions of uncertainty. In this context, there is a very intense need to be acquainted with progressive tools to support decision-making and management and to apply the acquired knowledge in practice. This paper focuses on three related areas. We are talking about knowledge management in connection with the most important contributing element—decision-making with quality management. We deal with the characteristics of the individual areas, defining their mutual relationship on a systemic basis. The paper also points to the necessary connection between theory and practice. More specifically, it points to the practical applications of management to decision-making as a managerial function and, at the same time, related to decision-making in quality management. Subsequently, we define the links to knowledge management with an emphasis on the use of procedures, methods, and knowledge in the decision-making process, which we use in theory and practice in quality management.

environmental sciences,environmental studies,green & sustainable science & technology
Classification of Determinants of Burnout Syndrome in Terms of Personality Traits of Public Administration Managers

Eva Brijová,Veronika Mlynárová,Peter Mlynár,Zuzana Birknerová,Ivan Uher

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci11090413

2022-09-09

Social Sciences

Abstract:Burnout syndrome is considered a disease of modern societies. Research has shown that burnout is related to reduced performance in the workplace. Many times, burnout syndrome occurs in helping professions, such as healthcare or social services. The aim of this explanatory research is to determine the relationship between the degree of burnout syndrome, personality traits, and determinants of burnout syndrome of managers in public administration. The Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI) has been used to measure burnout syndrome. Personality traits, i.e., neuroticism, extraversion, openness to experience, five-factor inverters (NEO FFI), and assessing the determinants of burnout syndrome (PDSV) have been considered. The research sample consisted of (n = 226) managers in public administration. Based on the determined three hypotheses, we brought together sufficient evidence to provide more than a tentative conclusion that there is a positive association between NEO FFI and PDSV, MBI and PDSV, as well as MBI and NEO FFI. It can be inferred that a high workload and a lack of resources are some of the most compelling aspects that can instigate burnout. In addition to what has been assumed, there is argumentation among professionals about what is burnout, its symptoms, diagnostic criteria, environment of its occurrence, which demands further investigation to waive the vagueness and ambiguity of the concept of burnout syndrome.
Managing Organizational Ethics in the Public Sector: A Pluralist Contingency Approach as an Alternative to the Integrity Management Framework

Maryse Tremblay,Joé T. Martineau,Thierry C. Pauchant

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10999922.2016.1230688

2016-10-27

Public Integrity

Abstract:Integrity management is the most widely advocated approach in the management of organizational ethics within the public sector. It calls for a balance between compliance and value approaches in order to implement appropriate controls, methods, instruments, and procedures that foster ethical behavior among organizational members. However, organizations do not yet have access to a tool or method that would allow them to measure this balance. By highlighting the main limitations of the integrity management framework, this article argues that such a tool has not yet been developed because it is extremely difficult to establish a balance between these two approaches. As its main contribution, the article proposes the adoption of a new pluralistic contingency approach in the management of organizational ethics, an approach that overcomes the limitations of the integrity management framework.
Methodological Problems of Assessing the Effectiveness of Public Administration of Socio-Economic Development

Tatyana Bukhovets

DOI: https://doi.org/10.36004/nier.es.2023.2-04

2024-02-01

Economy and sociology

Abstract:The need for theoretical, methodological and scientific substantiation of new ways to improve the effectiveness of public administration as well as for the development of a single comprehensive methodological approach to its assessment increases every year in the context of increasing demands of society to the quantity and quality of services provided by the state and the effectiveness of decisions taken by state bodies at the national and local levels. The purpose of the study is to identify the main problems and justify the methodological provisions for assessing the effectiveness of public administration. The study is based on the application of general scientific and special methods, as well as interdisciplinary approach, taking into account the provisions of the history and theory of public administration, economic science, political science, sociology, statistical theory, theory of regional studies, etc. The author develops the comprehensive methodological approach to assess the effectiveness of public administration, taking into account its multifaceted nature and complexity. The approach presents a toolkit and a step-by-step algorithm for assessing the effectiveness of public administration. It formulates the fundamental principles of assessment, substantiates the need to determine the object of assessment and type of effectiveness, which determine the specific purpose and objectives of assessment, as well as the relevant criteria, indicators and methods. At the last stages of the assessment, emphasis is placed on the importance of correct and accurate interpretation of the results obtained and the development of recommendations to eliminate identified bottlenecks and improve the effectiveness of public administration.
Investigating Innovative Models of Governance and Collaboration for Effective Public Administration in a Multi-Stakeholder Landscape

Teniayo Temitope

DOI: https://doi.org/10.47667/ijppr.v4i2.209

2023-05-26

International Journal Papier Public Review

Abstract:This thesis investigates innovative models of governance and collaboration in public administration to address the complexities of a multi-stakeholder landscape. The study explores the principles, characteristics, types, benefits, and challenges of collaborative governance, public-private partnerships, networked governance, and cross-sectoral collaboration. The research utilizes qualitative and quantitative methods, including interviews, surveys, and document analysis, to gather comprehensive insights. The findings showcase the importance of embracing new approaches that involve government agencies, private sector organizations, and civil society groups working together to tackle complex societal challenges. Tables present the key elements of each model, providing a visual comparison of their features and real-world applications. Additionally, the study highlights evaluation frameworks, such as the Logic Model, Results-Based Management (RBM), Theory of Change, Impact Evaluation, and Utilization-Focused Evaluation, to assess effectiveness and measure impact. The thesis contributes to the field of public administration by emphasizing the significance of collaborative governance and cross-sectoral collaboration. The research provides insights for policymakers, public administrators, and practitioners to adopt effective approaches in addressing challenges and achieving desired outcomes. By embracing innovative models of governance and collaboration, public administration can foster cooperation, inclusivity, and collective problem-solving among stakeholders. The study concludes with a call for further research and implementation of these approaches to create a resilient, responsive, and sustainable public administration system that delivers meaningful impact to society.
Ethical issues in public relations practice

Danijela Voza,Aleksandra Vuković,Milovan Vuković

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5937/imcsm24065v

Zbornik radova

Abstract:Public relations (PR), a significant part of the media industry, is a management function that helps establish and reflect beneficial relationships between the organization and its stakeholders. The development of public relations as a profession is usually seen as a departure from unethical practices, which dominated for decades after the 1920s, towards strategically and ethically driven campaigns in modern business. Nevertheless, when looking at the PR practice in the first decades of the 21st century, numerous doubts arise regarding ethical dilemmas, problems, and, consequently, the process of making ethically based decisions. The main goal of this paper is to consider the role of ethics in the development of PR. In this sense, the paper discusses basic ethical principles based on utilitarianism, deontology, situational, and virtue ethics. The authors also analyse the ethical problems that often arise in the modern practice of PR.

Business
Civil servant identity at the crossroads: new challenges for public administrations

Daniel J. Caron,David Giauque

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/09513550610685989

2006-10-01

International Journal of Public Sector Management

Abstract:Purpose To compare and contrast the changes introduced in Canada and Switzerland as a result of public management reforms and explore the ethical challenges they entail. Design/methodology/approach This is a case study of two countries based in part on secondary sources but also on observations made by the authors. Findings The strategies used in each country are different reflecting their distinct political institutions. But there is a commonality, namely the emergence of new ethical problems related to the changes under way. Each country has tackled these new ethical challenges in similar ways. Individual and group behaviour of both Canadian and Swiss civil servants is regulated through “external controls” (codes of ethics, rules of conduct), but also by means of the socialization of new professional values (quality of customer service, flexibility, innovation, creativity, efficiency and effectiveness). These external controls and new values are insufficient, however, to allow civil servants to develop their own capacity for ethical deliberation, an essential condition for enhancing ethical behaviour in modern public administrations. Research limitations/implications The findings are not based on a systematic comparative study and can only therefore be interpreted as indicative. Originality/value The writers offer an interesting model relating to methods of behaviour regulation in an ethical public service and the need to ensure that the public good and the public interest remain at the core of public servants identity.

Challenges of Modern Public Administration and Ethical Decision-Making

Public Administration Ethics in the Czech Republic

Leadership in public administration: today's challenges

Citizen Participation in Public Administration

Ethics of Digital Innovation in Public Administration

Methods and models of administrative decision-making in the socio-cultural sphere: analysis and perspectives

Handbook of Public Administration

A Conflict Resolution Approach to Public Administration

Competing Values in Public Administration

Artificial Public Administration – Myth or Reality?

Technology Ethics in Public Service: Envisioning the Role of the Techno-Ethicist

When Bureaucracy Meets the Crowd: Studying “Open Government” in the Vienna City Administration

Ethical codes for public administration – reflection of EU core values or part of national anti-corruption policy? Example of the Czech Republic and Ukraine

Ethics in Public Policy and Management

Decision-Making Procedures and Their Relation to Knowledge Management and Quality Management

Classification of Determinants of Burnout Syndrome in Terms of Personality Traits of Public Administration Managers

Managing Organizational Ethics in the Public Sector: A Pluralist Contingency Approach as an Alternative to the Integrity Management Framework

Methodological Problems of Assessing the Effectiveness of Public Administration of Socio-Economic Development

Investigating Innovative Models of Governance and Collaboration for Effective Public Administration in a Multi-Stakeholder Landscape

Ethical issues in public relations practice

Civil servant identity at the crossroads: new challenges for public administrations