Abstract:BACKGROUND: Clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula (grades B and C of the ISGPS definition) remains the most troublesome complication after pancreatoduodenectomy. The approach to management of the pancreatic remnant via some form of pancreatico-enteric anastomosis determines the incidence and severity of clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula. Despite numerous trials comparing diverse pancreatico-enteric anastomosis techniques and other adjunctive strategies (pancreatic duct stenting, somatostatin analogues, etc), currently, there is no clear consensus regarding the ideal method of pancreatico-enteric anastomosis.METHODS: An international panel of pancreatic surgeons working in well-known, high-volume centers reviewed the best contemporary literature concerning pancreatico-enteric anastomosis and worked to develop a position statement on pancreatic anastomosis after pancreatoduodenectomy.RESULTS: There is inherent risk assumed by creating a pancreatico-enteric anastomosis based on factors related to the gland (eg, parenchymal texture, disease pathology). None of the technical variations of pancreaticojejunal or pancreaticogastric anastomosis, such as duct-mucosa, invagination method, and binding technique, have been found to be consistently superior to another. Randomized trials and meta-analyses comparing pancreaticogastrostomy versus pancreaticojejunostomy yield conflicting results and are inherently prone to bias due to marked heterogeneity in the studies. The benefit of stenting the pancreatico-enteric anastomosis to decrease clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula is not supported by high-level evidence. While controversial, somatostatin analogues appear to decrease perioperative complications but not mortality, although consistent data across the more than 20 studies addressing this topic are lacking. The Fistula Risk Score is useful for predicting postoperative pancreatic fistula as well as for comparing outcomes of pancreatico-enteric anastomosis across studies.CONCLUSION: Currently, no specific technique can eliminate development of clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula. While consistent practice of any standardized technique may decrease the rate of clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula, experienced surgeons can have lower postoperative pancreatic fistula rates performing a variety of techniques depending on the clinical situation. There is no clear evidence on the benefit of internal or external stenting after pancreatico-enteric anastomosis. The use of somatostatin analogues may be important in decreasing morbidity after pancreatoduodenectomy, but it remains controversial. Future studies should focus on novel approaches to decrease the rate of clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula with appropriate risk adjustment.

Retromesenteric omental flap as arterial coverage in pancreaticoduodenectomy: A novel technique to prevent postpancreatectomy hemorrhage

Minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy for periampullary disease: a comprehensive review of literature and meta-analysis of outcomes compared with open surgery

A New Feasible Technique of Mesh-Reinforced Pancreatojejunostomy and Pancreatogastrostomy: Retrospective Analysis of 61 Cases

“Total Arterial Devascularization First” Technique for Resection of Pancreatic Head Cancer During Pancreaticoduodenectomy

Wrapping Gastroduodenal Artery Stump with the Teres Hepatis Ligament to Prevent Postpancreatectomy Hemorrhage after Pancreaticoduodenectomy

The Short- and Long-Term Outcomes of Laparoscopic Pancreaticoduodenectomy Combining with Different Type of Mesentericoportal Vein Resection and Reconstruction for Pancreatic Head Adenocarcinoma: a Chinese Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study

Incidence of Postoperative Pancreatic Fistula after Using a Defined Pancreaticojejunostomy Technique for Laparoscopic Pancreaticoduodenectomy: A Prospective Multicenter Study on 1033 Patients.

Arterial Resection and Reconstruction in Pancreatectomy: Surgical Technique and Outcomes.

A ligamentum teres hepatis and falciform ligament 'belt and braces' approach in laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy using a modified Blumgart anastomosis to minimize severe pancreatic fistula and post-operative complications

Surgical Complications after Pancreatoduodenectomy: Risk Factors and Treatments

Surgical Outcome After Distal Pancreatectomy With and Without Portomesenteric Venous Resection in Patients with Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma: A Transatlantic Evaluation of Patients in North America, Germany, Sweden, and The Netherlands (GAPASURG)

Omental Flap Technique in Pancreaticojejunostomy: Does it Prevent Pancreatic Fistula Development after Pancreaticoduodenectomy?

Hepatic artery protection using a polyglycolic acid sheet during pancreaticoduodenectomy: A multicenter study

Surgical Methods Influence on the Risk of Anastomotic Fistula after Pancreaticoduodenectomy: a Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

Prevention and treatment of hemorrhage after pancreaticoduodenectomy

Pancreatic anastomosis after pancreatoduodenectomy: A position statement by the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS)

Feasibility of mesentericoportal vein reconstruction by autologous falciform ligament during pancreaticoduodenectomy-cohort study

Laparoscopic Pancreaticoduodenectomy with Portal or Superior Mesenteric Vein Resection and Reconstruction for Pancreatic Cancer: A Single-Center Experience.

Diagnosis and Treatment of Hemorrhage after Pancreatoduodenectomy Via Digital Subtraction Angiography and Transcatheter Arterial Embolization

Diagnosis and Treatment Efficacy of Digital Subtraction Angiography and Transcatheter Arterial Embolization in Post-Pancreatectomy Hemorrhage: A Single Center Retrospective Cohort Study.

Intra-abdominal Hemorrhage Following 739 Consecutive Pancreaticoduodenectomy: Risk Factors and Treatments