Abstract:Lacustrine shale in continental rift basins is complex and features a variety of mineralogical compositions and microstructures. The lithofacies type of shale, mainly determined by mineralogical composition and microstructure, is the most critical factor controlling the quality of shale oil reservoirs. Conventional geophysical methods cannot accurately forecast lacustrine shale lithofacies types, thus restricting the progress of shale oil exploration and development. Considering the lacustrine shale in the upper Es4 member of the Dongying Sag in the Jiyang Depression, Bohai Bay Basin, China, as the research object, the lithofacies type was forecast based on two machine learning methods: support vector machine (SVM) and extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost). To improve the forecast accuracy, we applied the following approaches: first, using core and thin section analyses of consecutively cored wells, the lithofacies were finely reclassified into 22 types according to mineralogical composition and microstructure, and the vertical change of lithofacies types was obtained. Second, in addition to commonly used well logging data, paleoenvironment parameter data (Rb/Sr ratio, paleoclimate parameter; Sr %, paleosalinity parameter; Ti %, paleoprovenance parameter; Fe/Mn ratio, paleo-water depth parameter; P/Ti ratio, paleoproductivity parameter) were applied to the forecast. Third, two sample extraction modes, namely, curve shape-to-points and point-to-point, were used in the machine learning process. Finally, the lithofacies type forecast was carried out under six different conditions. In the condition of selecting the curved shape-to-point sample extraction mode and inputting both well logging and paleoenvironment parameter data, the SVM method achieved the highest average forecast accuracy for all lithofacies types, reaching 68%, as well as the highest average forecast accuracy for favorable lithofacies types at 98%. The forecast accuracy for all lithofacies types improved by 7%–28% by using both well logging and paleoenvironment parameter data rather than using one or the other, and was 7%–8% higher by using the curve shape-to-point sample extraction mode compared to the point-to-point sample extraction mode. In addition, the learning sample quantity and data value overlap of different lithofacies types affected the forecast accuracy. The results of our study confirm that machine learning is an effective solution to forecast lacustrine shale lithofacies. When adopting machine learning methods, increasing the learning sample quantity (>45 groups), selecting the curve shape-to-point sample extraction mode, and using both well logging and paleoenvironment parameter data are effective ways to improve the forecast accuracy of lacustrine shale lithofacies types. The method and results of this study provide guidance to accurately forecast the lacustrine shale lithofacies types in new shale oil wells and will promote the harvest of lacustrine shale oil globally.

Prediction of igneous lithology and lithofacies based on ensemble learning with data optimization

Integrated Carbonate Lithofacies Modeling Based on the Deep Learning and Seismic Inversion and Its Application

Data-driven lithofacies prediction in complex tight sandstone reservoirs: a supervised workflow integrating clustering and classification models

Machine Learning Based Fluids and Lithofacies Prediction Based on the Integration of Well Logging Data and Seismic Inversion

Data-Driven Classification and Logging Prediction of Mudrock Lithofacies Using Machine Learning: Shale Oil Reservoirs in the Eocene Shahejie Formation, Bonan Sag, Bohai Bay Basin, Eastern China

Sequential data-driven cross-domain lithology identification under logging data distribution discrepancy

Unsupervised Domain Adaptation Using Maximum Mean Discrepancy Optimization for Lithology Identification

An automatic identification method of imbalanced lithology based on Deep Forest and K-means SMOTE

Machine Learning Algorithms for Lithofacies Classification of the Gulong Shale from the Songliao Basin, China

An ensemble-based machine learning solution for imbalanced multiclass dataset during lithology log generation

Forecast of Lacustrine Shale Lithofacies Types in Continental Rift Basins Based on Machine Learning: A Case Study from Dongying Sag, Jiyang Depression, Bohai Bay Basin, China

Lithofacies logging identification for strongly heterogeneous deep-buried reservoirs based on improved Bayesian inversion: The Lower Jurassic sandstone, Central Junggar Basin, China

A prediction method for favorable hydrocarbon accumulation areas in carbonate oil reservoirs based on machine learning and driven by formation water chemical characteristic data

An Improved Method for Lithology Identification Based on a Hidden Markov Model and Random Forests

A lithofacies prediction method based on stochastic simulation

Reservoir Lithology Identification Based on Improved Adversarial Learning.

Integrating deep learning and logging data analytics for lithofacies classification and 3D modeling of tight sandstone reservoirs

Lithology identification from well-log curves via neural networks with additional geologic constraint

Well-Logging-Based Lithology Classification Using Machine Learning Methods for High-Quality Reservoir Identification: A Case Study of Baikouquan Formation in Mahu Area of Junggar Basin, NW China

Sedimentary Facies Identification Technique Based on Multimodal Data Fusion

A Data-Driven Approach for Lithology Identification Based on Parameter-Optimized Ensemble Learning