Abstract:Background To measure the success of three different artificial intelligence chatbots, ChatGPT, Bard, and Bing, in correctly answering questions about glaucoma types and treatment modalities and to examine their superiority over each other. Materials and Methods Thirty-two questions about glaucoma types and treatment modalities were asked using the ChatGPT, Bard, and Bing chatbots. The correct and incorrect answers were also provided. Accuracy rates were compared. Outcomes Questions asked: ChatGPT answered 56.3%, Bard 78.1%, and Bing 59.4% correctly. There was no statistically significant difference between the three artificial intelligence chatbots in the rate of correct and incorrect answers to the questions asked (p = 0.195). Conclusion Artificial intelligence chatbots can be used as a tool to access accurate information regarding glaucoma types and treatment modalities. However, the information obtained is not always accurate, and care should be taken when using this information. Hintergrund Ziel ist es, den Erfolg von drei verschiedenen Chatbots mit künstlicher Intelligenz – ChatGPT, Bard und Bing – bei der richtigen Beantwortung von Fragen zu Glaukomarten und Behandlungsmethoden zu messen und ihre Überlegenheit gegenüber den anderen zu untersuchen. Methoden Mithilfe der Chatbots ChatGPT, Bard und Bing wurden 32 Fragen zu Glaukomarten und Behandlungsmethoden gestellt. Die richtigen und falschen Antworten wurden ebenfalls angegeben. Die Genauigkeitsraten wurden verglichen. Ergebnisse Gestellte Fragen: ChatGPT antwortete 56,3%, Bard 78,1% und Bing 59,4% richtig. Es gab keinen statistisch signifikanten Unterschied in der Rate der richtigen und falschen Antworten auf die gestellten Fragen zwischen den drei Chatbots mit künstlicher Intelligenz (p = 0,195). Schlussfolgerung Chatbots mit künstlicher Intelligenz können als Hilfsmittel eingesetzt werden, um genaue Informationen zu Glaukomarten und Behandlungsmethoden zu erhalten. Die erhaltenen Informationen sind jedoch nicht immer genau und bei der Verwendung dieser Informationen ist Vorsicht geboten. Already Known: Chatbots are new applications that have emerged with the development of artificial intelligence programs. Although the usability of artificial intelligence programs in ophthalmology fields has been tested, the existence and usability of three different artificial intelligence chatbots, which are available for free use, have not been investigated for their superiority over each other in accessing information about glaucoma diseases and treatment methods. Newly described: Although all three artificial intelligence programs were not statistically superior to each other in answering the questions correctly, the more up-to-date Bard and Bing artificial intelligence chatbots answered the questions with higher accuracy rates. Artificial intelligence programs, including current artificial intelligence programs such as Bard and Bing, may encounter various obstacles (paid access, etc.) in accessing current and accurate information. There seems to be a need for further development of artificial intelligence programs and the completion of these deficiencies. Received: 12 August 2023 Accepted: 12 May 2024 Article published online: 24 July 2024 © 2024. Thieme. All rights reserved. Georg Thieme Verlag KG Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

Assessing the proficiency of artificial intelligence programs in the diagnosis and treatment of cornea, conjunctiva, and eyelid diseases and exploring the advantages of each other benefits

Evaluation of Current Artificial Intelligence Programs on the Knowledge of Glaucoma

Performance of ChatGPT in Diagnosis of Corneal Eye Diseases

Evaluating the Accuracy of ChatGPT and Google BARD in Fielding Oculoplastic Patient Queries: A Comparative Study on Artificial versus Human Intelligence

Accuracy of an Artificial Intelligence Chatbot’s Interpretation of Clinical Ophthalmic Images

Reliability and accuracy of artificial intelligence ChatGPT in providing information on ophthalmic diseases and management to patients

The ability of artificial intelligence chatbots ChatGPT and Google Bard to accurately convey pre-operative information for patients undergoing ophthalmological surgeries

Performance Assessment of an Artificial Intelligence Chatbot in Clinical Vitreoretinal Scenarios

Evaluating the Artificial Intelligence Performance Growth in Ophthalmic Knowledge

Artificial Intelligence in Ophthalmology: A Comparative Analysis of GPT-3.5, GPT-4, and Human Expertise in Answering StatPearls Questions

ChatGPT and retinal disease: a cross-sectional study on AI comprehension of clinical guidelines

A Comparative Study of ChatGPT-3.5, ChatGPT-4.0, Gemini, Copilot, Chatsonic, and Perplexity

Comparative analysis of ChatGPT and Bard in answering pathology examination questions requiring image interpretation

Talking technology: exploring chatbots as a tool for cataract patient education

Frequently asked questions on erectile dysfunction: evaluating artificial intelligence answers with expert mentorship

Comparison of artificial intelligence large language model chatbots in answering frequently asked questions in anaesthesia

Are artificial intelligence chatbots a reliable source of information about contact lenses?

Artificial Intelligence Versus Medical Students in General Surgery Exam

Appropriateness and readability of Google Bard and ChatGPT-3.5 generated responses for surgical treatment of glaucoma

Does ChatGPT Answer Otolaryngology Questions Accurately?

Accuracy and usability of artificial intelligence chatbot generated chemotherapy protocols