Julie. A. Theurer,Rosemary Martino,Nedeljko Jovanovic,John R. de Almeida,David P. Goldstein,Kevin Fung,John Yoo,S. Danielle MacNeil,Eric Winquist,J. Alex Hammond,Varagur Venkatesan,Nancy Read,Sarah Kuruvilla,Andrew Warner,Philip C. Doyle,Ian Ross,Colleen Dreyer,Sarah Hawkins,Kendra Thouless,Courtney McCallum,David A. Palma,Anthony C. Nichols

Abstract:Background This ORATOR sub‐study evaluated swallowing physiology in patients treated with transoral robotic surgery (TORS) versus radiotherapy (RT) for early‐stage oropharynx cancer. Methods Swallowing physiology was evaluated using videofluoroscopy and outcomes were compared across treatment arms and correlated with MDADI scores. Results Of the 68 patients in the ORATOR trial, 21 participated in this sub‐study (30.8%), including 15 RT Arm and six TORS Arm patients. Swallowing profiles were not significantly different between the arms. MBSImP pharyngeal scores for RT Arm versus TORS Arm patients were 4.8 (±2.1) versus 4.3 (±1.5) at baseline, 6.2 (±1.2) versus 9.6 (±4.8) at 6 months and 5.9 (±1.8) versus 8.0 (±4.7) at 12 months. MBSImP pharyngeal scores demonstrated weak associations with several MDADI subscales and PAS scores. Conclusions To best describe swallowing outcomes in studies of RT and/or surgery, instrumental swallowing assessments should be strongly considered in addition to quality of life measures.

Impact of Transoral Robotic Surgery Versus Radiation on Swallowing Function in Oropharyngeal Cancer Patients: A Sub‐Study From a Randomized Trial