Abstract:Background: Upper limb impairments in a hemiparetic arm are clinically quantified by well-established clinical scales, known to suffer poor validity, reliability, and sensitivity. Alternatively, robotics can assess motor impairments by characterizing joint dynamics through system identification. In this study, we establish the merits of quantifying abnormal synergy, spasticity, and changes in joint viscoelasticity using system identification, evaluating (1) feasibility and quality of parametric estimates, (2) test-retest reliability, (3) differences between healthy controls and patients with upper limb impairments, and (4) construct validity. Methods: Forty-five healthy controls, twenty-nine stroke patients, and twenty cerebral palsy patients participated. Participants were seated with the affected arm immobilized in the Shoulder-Elbow-Perturbator (SEP). The SEP is a one-degree-of-freedom perturbator that enables applying torque perturbations to the elbow while providing varying amounts of weight support to the human arm. Participants performed either a 'do not intervene' or a resist task. Elbow joint admittance was quantified and used to extract elbow viscosity and stiffness. Fifty-four of the participants performed two sessions to establish the test-retest reliability of the parameters. Construct validity was assessed by correlating system identification parameters to parameters extracted using a SEP protocol that objectifies current clinical scales (Re-Arm protocol). Results: Feasibility was confirmed by all participants successfully completing the study protocol within ~ 25 min without reporting pain or burden. The parametric estimates were good with a variance-accounted-for of ~ 80%. A fair to excellent test-retest reliability was found ([Formula: see text]) for patients, except for elbow stiffness with full weight support ([Formula: see text]). Compared to healthy controls, patients had a higher elbow viscosity and stiffness during the 'do not intervene' task and lower viscosity and stiffness during the resist task. Construct validity was confirmed by a significant (all [Formula: see text]) but weak to moderate ([Formula: see text]) correlation with parameters from the Re-Arm protocol. Conclusions: This work demonstrates that system identification is feasible and reliable for quantifying upper limb motor impairments. Validity was confirmed by differences between patients and controls and correlations with other measurements, but further work is required to optimize the experimental protocol and establish clinical value.

An Initial Psychometric Evaluation of a Novel Upper Extremity Pediatric Stroke Hemiplegic Motor Impairment Scale (Pedi HEMIs - UE)

U-Rate-UE; Measuring perceived recovery of the affected upper extremity in adults post-stroke

Upper extremity kinematics: Development of a quantitative measure of impairment severity and dissimilarity after stroke

Upper limb motor assessment for stroke with force, muscle activation and interhemispheric balance indices based on sEMG and fNIRS

Laboratory-Based Examination of the Reliability and Validity of Kinematic Measures of Wrist and Finger Function Collected by a Telerehabilitation System in Persons with Chronic Stroke

Assessment of inter-rater and intra-rater reliability of the Luna EMG robot as a tool for assessing upper limb proprioception in patients with stroke-a prospective observational study

Motor Function Evaluation of Hemiplegic Upper-Extremities Using Data Fusion from Wearable Inertial and Surface EMG Sensors

Interrater reliability of the Fugl-Meyer Motor assessment in stroke patients: a quality management project within the ESTREL study

System identification: a feasible, reliable and valid way to quantify upper limb motor impairments

Inter- and intra-rater reliability and clinical utility of the Brachial Plexus Outcome Measure: A pilot study

Psychometric properties of the Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory – Patient Reported Outcome: A cognitively accessible measure of functional performance

A Systematic Review of Upper Extremity Outcome Measures Assessed in Randomized Controlled Trials of Post-Stroke Upper Extremity Rehabilitation in Low-to-Middle-Income and High-Income Countries.

Pediatric Performance-Based Outcome Measures for Upper Extremity Function: A Scoping Review and Linking to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health

Are the Hierarchical Properties of the Fugl-Meyer Assessment Scale the Same in Acute Stroke and Chronic Stroke?

Design and Interrater Reliability of the Pediatric Version of the Race Scale: PedRACE

Accumulative Assessment of Upper Extremity

Self-perceived upper extremity motor function predicts health-related quality of life in chronic stroke survivors

Validation of the Kinematic Assessment Protocol Used in the Technology-Supported Neurorehabilitation System, Rehabilitation Technologies for Hand and Arm (R3THA™), in Children and Teenagers with Cerebral Palsy

Association of Modified Rankin Scale With Recovery Phenotypes in Patients With Upper Extremity Weakness After Stroke

Hierarchical Properties of the Fugl-Meyer Assessment Upper Extremity Scale for People After Stroke

Identifying the most representative actigraphy variables reflecting standardized hand function assessments for remote monitoring in children with unilateral cerebral palsy