Abstract:While the impacts of shared micromobility (SMM) on the environment and transport systems are being extensively researched, its societal implications and the influence of the social environment on the use of SMM remain largely unexplored. In this research, we investigate the interrelationships between the use of SMM, perceived overall accessibility, and social capital. We focus on two types of SMM – shared bikes and shared e-scooters – in three European countries: the Netherlands, England, and Sweden. We measure perceived overall accessibility through a multicriteria subjective evaluation of individuals' ability to reach regular destinations, services, and activities. We consider multidimensional social capital measures: social trust, cooperativeness, reciprocity, network bonding, and network bridging. We use multivariate models to investigate the associations between perceived overall accessibility, SMM use, and social capital, and examine the dominant direction of these associations using the direct linear non-Gaussian acyclic model (DirectLiNGAM) and direction dependence analysis (DDA). We find that lower levels of perceived overall accessibility may contribute to lower levels of social trust, reciprocity, and cooperativeness. However, individuals with a lower level of perceived overall accessibility tend to use shared bikes more frequently, which in turn, may increase their social trust and cooperativeness. We also find that increased shared e-scooter use may contribute to increased network bonding, yet the frequency of use has no relation with perceived overall accessibility. Our research suggests that the introduction of shared bikes alone, independent of other measures aimed at encouraging their use, may help mitigate individual differences in social capital. We argue that the applied DirectLiNGAM and DDA help gain deeper insights into the likely causal relationship between transport and social capital in non-intervention studies.

Shared micromobility and equity: A comparison between station-based, hybrid, and dockless models

E-Sharing: Data-driven Online Optimization of Parking Location Placement for Dockless Electric Bike Sharing

How shared e-scooter programs affect docked bikeshare ridership in communities of concern: a tale of two cities

The long journey to equity: A comparative policy analysis of US electric micromobility programs

Enhancing Carbon Efficiency in Shared Micro-Mobility Systems: an Agent-Based Fleet Size and Layout Assessment Approach

Shared micromobility, perceived accessibility, and social capital

Is access to public bike-share networks equitable? A multiyear spatial analysis across 5 U.S. Cities

Taking a multimodal approach to equitable bike share station siting

Shared E-Scooter User Characteristics and Usage Patterns across Four U.S. Cities

Equity implications of electric bikesharing in Philadelphia

Connecting metros with shared electric scooters: Comparisons with shared bikes and taxis

Comparative Analysis of User Behavior of Dock-Based vs. Dockless Bikeshare and Scootershare in Washington, D.C

Micromobility in Smart Cities: A Closer Look at Shared Dockless E-Scooters via Big Social Data

Do e-scooters fill mobility gaps and promote equity before and during COVID-19? A spatiotemporal analysis using open big data

Shared e-scooter micromobility: review of use patterns, perceptions and environmental impacts

Analyzing the micro-mobility patterns of shared dockless bike and e-bike systems through multi-scale complex networks

Quantifying relation between mobility patterns and socioeconomic status of dockless sharing-bike users

Comprehensive comparison of e-scooter sharing mobility: Evidence from 30 European cities

Connecting the Last Mile: the Impact of Dockless Bike-sharing on Public Transportation

The travel pattern difference in dockless micro-mobility: Shared e-bikes versus shared bikes

What is shared in shared bicycles? Mobility, space, and capital