Cardiovascular outcomes with exenatide in type 2 diabetes according to ejection fraction: The EXSCEL trial

João Sérgio Neves,Ana Rita Leite,Robert J. Mentz,Rury R. Holman,Faiez Zannad,Javed Butler,Milton Packer,João Pedro Ferreira

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ejhf.3478

2024-10-10

European Journal of Heart Failure

Abstract:Cardiovascular outcomes with exenatide in type 2 diabetes (T2D) according to left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF): the EXSCEL trial. CI, confidence interval; CVD, cardiovascular disease; GLP‐1 RA, glucagon‐like peptide‐1 receptor agonist; HHF, hospitalization for heart failure; HR, hazard ratio; NYHA, New York Heart Association. Aims Glucagon‐like peptide‐1 receptor agonists reduce major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and cardiovascular mortality in people with type 2 diabetes (T2D). However, previous studies suggest the effects on heart failure outcomes vary according to left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). We aimed to evaluate the effects of exenatide on cardiovascular events according to LVEF in people with T2D. Methods and results Post‐hoc analysis of the Exenatide Study of Cardiovascular Event Lowering (EXSCEL) trial evaluating the effects of once‐weekly exenatide (EQW) versus placebo on cardiovascular outcomes according to baseline LVEF (<40% or ≥40%). Outcomes were also evaluated according to New York Heart Association (NYHA) class and obesity. The main outcome was hospitalization for heart failure (HHF). A treatment‐by‐LVEF interaction was used. In EXSCEL (n = 14 752), 4749 participants had LVEF available at baseline; 455 (10%) with LVEF <40%, 4294 (90%) with LVEF ≥40%. LVEF modified the EQW effect on hHF: hazard ratio (HR) = 1.52 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.95–2.43) in participants with LVEF 0.10) were observed for MACE, cardiovascular death or all‐cause mortality. The risk of HHF was also modified by baseline NYHA class (HR 0.91, 95% CI 0.65–1.27 for NYHA class I/II; HR 1.84, 95% CI 0.95–3.59 for NYHA class III/IV; p‐interaction = 0.062), mostly driven by the LVEF <40% subgroup. Obesity did not modify the effects of EQW on HHF. Conclusions The EQW effect on HHF was influenced by LVEF, with a potentially decreased risk in participants with LVEF ≥40% and increased risk in those with LVEF <40%. The risk of HHF was particularly high in participants with LVEF <40% and NYHA class III/IV. LVEF did not modify the effect of EQW on atherosclerotic outcomes.

cardiac & cardiovascular systems