Abstract:We read with great interest the article by Mangiavillano and colleagues [1] reporting a retrospective multicenter study on lumen-apposing metal stents (LAMSs) for endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided treatment of pancreatic fluid collections (PFCs). Using propensity score matching, the authors demonstrated that the Spaxus stent, with its smoothly shaped edges, may mitigate bleeding risk compared with the widely used Axios stent. Based on these promising results, we endoscopists will likely be prompted to conduct a prospective randomized trial. We should pay attention to the following factors to prevent severe bleeding [2] [3]: (i) EUS-guided puncture of a PFC and self-expansion of the LAMS (with supplementary balloon dilation); (ii) mechanical contact with the LAMS edge; and (iii) subsequent endoscopic necrosectomy for walled-off necrosis. Severe bleeding occurred in two patients with the Spaxus stent (one around the stent and one within a PFC cavity), whereas five and four patients in the Axios group experienced stent-related and intracavity bleeding, respectively. LAMSs were deployed using an electrocautery-enhanced delivery system or a cystotome with the same cutting current for all cases. Most of the bleeding events occurred more than 48 hours after the procedure. Therefore, the difference in bleeding risk appeared not to be attributable to the between-group heterogeneity in the puncture procedures. Herein, we commend the authors for providing information on whether intracavity bleeding was related to necrosectomy or other factors (e.g. pseudoaneurysm [4]) and whether the preventive effect of the Spaxus stent on bleeding differed with the placement of a coaxial plastic stent [5]. This information may serve as valuable data when considering preventive measures for LAMS-related bleeding events. In conclusion, this study suggests differential risk profiles for LAMSs, presumably owing to the stent designs. A better understanding of the mechanism through which the different designs affect bleeding risk would help us design new LAMSs and improve patient outcomes. Article published online: 29 August 2024 © 2024. Thieme. All rights reserved. Georg Thieme Verlag KG Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

Lumen-apposing metal stents for pancreatic fluid collections: what makes a difference?

Lumen-apposing metal stents for the treatment of pancreatic and peripancreatic fluid collections and bleeding risk: a propensity matched study

Safety and efficacy of lumen-apposing metal stents for endoscopic ultrasound-guided drainage of pancreatic fluid collections: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Lumen-apposing metal stents (LAMS) for pancreatic fluid collection (PFC) drainage: may not be business as usual

A novel lumen-apposing metal stent for endoscopic drainage of symptomatic pancreatic fluid collections: a retrospective study

Metal versus plastic stents for walled-off pancreatic necrosis: much alike, then which?

Protocol of early lumen apposing metal stent removal for pseudocysts and walled off necrosis avoids bleeding complications

Comparison of three different stents for endoscopic ultrasound-guided drainage of pancreatic fluid collection: A large retrospective study

EUS-guided drainage of peripancreatic fluid collections with lumen-apposing metal stents and plastic double-pigtail stents: comparison of efficacy and adverse event rates

Equivalent efficacy and safety of plastic stents and lumen-apposing metal stents in the treatment of peripancreatic fluid collections: a prospective cohort study

Comparative outcomes of endoscopic ultrasound-guided lumen-apposing mental stents drainage for pancreatic pseudocysts and walled-off necrosis: Case series and meta-analysis

Comparative Outcomes of EUS-Guided Lumen-Apposing Mental Stents Drainage for Pancreatic Pseudocysts and Walled-off Necrosis: Case Series and Meta-Analysis

Multicenter study of the efficacy and safety of electrocautery-enhanced lumen-apposing metal stents for the internal drainage of pancreatic fluid collections

Validation of the Orlando Protocol for endoscopic management of pancreatic fluid collections in the era of lumen‐apposing metal stents

Lumen-apposing metal stents (with videos)

Value of Lumen-Apposing Metal Stent in the Treatment of 27 Cases with Peripancreatic Fluid Accumulation in Acute Pancreatitis

Indirect comparison of various lumen apposing metal stents for EUS-guided biliary and gallbladder drainage: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Clinical application and follow-up of electrocautery-enhanced lumen-apposing metal stents for endoscopic ultrasonography-guided interventions

Lumen-apposing metal stents versus double-pigtail plastic stents for infected necrotising pancreatitis: more doubts than answers

S1577 Are Double-Pigtail Plastic Stents Beneficial for Endoscopic Ultrasound Guided Gallbladder Drainage with Lumen Apposing Metal Stents?

S3992 Stuck in the Middle: A Cautionary Tale of an Embedded Lumen-Apposing Metal Stent Used for Pyloric Stenosis